Market Structure, Competition, and Innovation in the European and US Chemical Industries

  • Pedro L. Marín
  • Georges Siotis

Abstract

This chapter applies the “bounds approach” to industry structure proposed by Sutton ((1991), (1998)). Part of the novelty in this exercise is that we work on the finest possible level of disaggregation. Also, we identify demand substitutability from direct industry sources. This allows us to carefully define markets, and identify R&D intensity for each of them. We then compare the relationship between market structure and innovation in Europe and the US. It emerges that both industries share many common features. In particular, it appears that the intensity of competition is similar across both side of the Atlantic. However, the European chemical industry is characterised by a lower degree of product homogeneity when compared to its US counterpart.

Key words

Bounds Approach Market Structure Innovation Chemical Industry 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cohen, W. and R. Levin, (1989), “Empirical Studies of Innovation and Market Structure”, in Schmalensee, R, Willig, R., (eds.) Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. II, pp. 1060–1098.Google Scholar
  2. Davies, S., (1980), “Minimum Efficient Size and Seller Concentration: An Empirical Problem”, The Journal of Industrial Economics, 29, pp.287–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Lyons, B. and C. Matraves, (1996), “Industrial Concentration” in Davies, S, and Lyons, B, et al, Industrial Organization in the European Union: Structure, Strategy and the Competitive Mechanism, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Marin, P., and Siotis, G., (2002) “Innovation and Market Structure: An Empirical Evaluation of the “Bounds Approach” in the Chemical Industry”, CEPR DP #3162, January.Google Scholar
  5. Matraves, C, (1999), “Market Structure, R&D and Advertising in the Pharmaceutical Industry”, The Journal of Industrial Economics, 47 (2), pp. 169–194.Google Scholar
  6. Robinson, W. and J. Chiang, (1996), “Are Sutton’s Predictions Robust? Empirical Insights into Advertising, R&D, and Concentration”, The Journal of Industrial Economics, 44 (4), pp.389–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Scherer, F. M. and D. Ross, (1990), Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, Third Edition, pp. 644–660, Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.Google Scholar
  8. Schmalensee, R. T., (1989) “Inter-industry Studies of Structure and Performance” Schmalensee, R, Willig, R, (eds.) Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. II, pp. 951–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Sutton, J., (1991), Sunk Cost and Market Structure, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Sutton, J., (1998) Technology and Market Structure, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Shreve and Brink (1977), Chemical Process Industries, McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pedro L. Marín
    • 1
    • 2
  • Georges Siotis
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Universidad Carlos III de Madrid-CEPRSpain
  2. 2.Universidad Carlos III de MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations