Citizenship Education in Hong Kong: Development and Challenges
Until July 1997, when it was returned to Chinese sovereignty, Hong Kong was a British colony for about one and a half centuries. Its long colonial history was characterised by a strategy of depoliticisation on the part of the government and by apoliticised attitudes among its people. There are two major reasons for such a characterisation of Hong Kong. First, situated on the border of China, Hong Kong was geographically more subject to Chinese than British influences, especially in terms of food and water supply and control of refugee and immigrant inflows. Governance of Hong Kong was viable only if there was a consensus among the British, Chinese and Hong Kong governments. This necessitated a scenario in which politics was downplayed. Second, Hong Kong itself was a territory of immigrants, largely composed of refugees from China. Its early immigrants treated Hong Kong as a haven from the Communist regime. At the same time, it was close enough to maintain connections with relatives and friends in the Mainland. A later batch of refugees came during the period of the Cultural Revolution in the 1970s, again to escape from politics. Because of the political-phobia among the refugees, coupled with a Chinese tradition that the common people should keep their distance from governmental and judicial agencies, Hong Kong’s inhabitants tended to avoid politics as far as possible. Instead, they focused their attention on economic activities.
KeywordsNational Identity Civic Participation Civic Education Legislative Council Student Respondent
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bray, M. & Lee, W.O. (2001). Education and political transition in East Asia: Diversity and commonality, In M. Bray & W.O. Lee (Eds.), Education and political transition: Themes and experiences in East Asia (pp. 1–18). Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
- Cheung, F. (1995). The politicization of Hong Kong secondary school curriculum. Unpublished P.C.Ed. assignment essay, The University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
- Curriculum Development Committee. (1985). Guidelines on civic education in schools. Hong Kong: Education Department.Google Scholar
- Curriculum Development Council. (1996). Guidelines on civic education in schools. Hong Kong: Education Department.Google Scholar
- Education Department. (1995). Information concerning the situation of the implementation of civic education in schools. Hong Kong: Education Department.Google Scholar
- Hong Kong Examinations Authority. (1997). Hong Kong advanced level examination: regulations and syllabuses. Hong Kong: Government Printer.Google Scholar
- Lau, S.K. & Louie, K.S. (1993). Hong Kong tried democracy: The 1991 elections in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
- Lee, M.K. (1990). Politicians. In R.Y.C. Wong & J.Y.S. Cheng (Eds.), The other Hong Kong report 1990 (pp. 113–132). Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
- Lee, W.O. & Sweeting, A. (2001). Controversies in Hong Kong’s political transition: Nationalism versus liberalism. In M. Bray & W.O. Lee (Eds.), Education and politicaltransition: Themes and experiences in East Asia (pp. 101–121). Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
- Tan, J. (1993). History of the history curriculum under colonialism and decolonization: A comparison of Hong Kong and Macau. Unpublished master’s dissertation, Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
- Tan, J.K. (1999). Secondary school history curricula. In M. Bray & R. Koo (Eds.), Education and society in Hong Kong and Macau: comparative perspectives on continuity and change (pp. 171–194). Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre: The University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
- Portion of the Phase One report has appeared in W.O. Lee. (1999). Controversies of Civic Education in Political Transition: Hong Kong. In J. Torney-Purta, J. Schwüle, and J.-A. Amadeo (Eds.), Civic Education Across Countries: Twenty-four National Case Studies from the IEA Civic Education Project. Amsterdam: The International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. The author would like to acknowledge Sara Wong and Andromeda Wong for their research assistance.Google Scholar