Evolution of the Proximal Third Phalanx in Oligocene-Miocene Equids, and the Utility of Phalangeal Indices in Phylogeny Reconstruction

  • Jay A. O’Sullivan
Part of the Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology Series book series (VERT)

The late Oligocene – early Miocene of Florida contain Miohippus, Archaeohippus, Anchitherium, and Parahippus, equid genera that possess and define many of the character state transitions that occurred between advanced anchitheriine and primitive equine horses. Although much previous research regarding Archaeohippus has emphasized its uniqueness, the genus is equally interesting for those characters that suggest its affinities to other taxa.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albright, L. B., III, 1998. The Arikareean Land Mammal Age in Texas and Florida: southern extension of Great Plains faunas and Gulf Coastal Plain endemism. In: Terry, D. O., Jr., LaGarry, H. E., Hunt, R. M., Jr. (Eds.), Depositional Environments, Lithostratigraphy, and Biostratigraphy of the White River and Arikaree Groups (Late Eocene to Early Miocene, North America). Geological Society of America Special Paper 325, Boulder, Colorado, pp. 167–183.Google Scholar
  2. Albright, L. B., III, 1999. Ungulates of the Toledo Bend Local Fauna (late Arikareean, early Miocene), Texas coastal plain. Bulletin of the Florida Museum of Natural History 42, 1–80.Google Scholar
  3. Behrensmeyer, A. K., Damuth, J. D., DiMichele, W. A., Potts, R., Wing, S. L., 1992. Terrestrial Ecosystems Through Time: Evolutionary Paleoecology of Terrestrial Plants and Animals. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  4. Bode, F. D., 1933. Anchitheriine horses from the Merychippus zone of the North Coalinga district, California. Carnegie Institution of Washington 440, 43–58.Google Scholar
  5. Camp, C. L., Smith, N., 1942. Phylogeny and functions of the digital ligaments of the horse. University of California Memoirs 13, 69–124.Google Scholar
  6. Cope, E. D., 1886. On two new species of three-toed horses from the upper Miocene, with notes on the fauna of the Ticholeptus beds. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 23, 357–361.Google Scholar
  7. Downs, T., 1956. The Mascall fauna from the Miocene of Oregon. University of California Publications in Geological Science 31, 199–354.Google Scholar
  8. Evander, R. L., 1989. Phylogeny of the Equidae. In: Prothero, D. R., Schoch, R. M. (Eds.), The Evolution of Perissodactyls. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 109–127.Google Scholar
  9. Forsten, A., 1975. The fossil horses of the Texas Gulf Coastal Plain: A revision. Texas Memorial Museum, Pearce-Sellards-Series 22, 1–87.Google Scholar
  10. Frailey, D., 1979. The large mammals of the Buda Local Fauna (Arikareean: Alachua County, Florida). Bulletin of the Florida State Museum, Biological Sciences 24, 123–173.Google Scholar
  11. Frailey, D., 1980. The beginning of the age of mammals in Florida. The Plaster Jacket 33, 4–13.Google Scholar
  12. Froehlich, D. J., 1999. Phylogenetic systematics of basal perissodactyls. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 19, 140–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gidley, J. W., 1906. A new genus of horse from the Mascall beds, with notes on the small collections of equine teeth in the University of California. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 22, 385–388.Google Scholar
  14. Hay, O. P., 1924. Description of some fossil vertebrates from the upper Miocene of Texas. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 37, 1–20.Google Scholar
  15. Hayes, F. G., 2000. The Brooksville 2 Local Fauna (Arikareean, latest Oligocene): Hernando County, Florida. Bulletin of the Florida Museum of Natural History 43, 1–47.Google Scholar
  16. Huddleston, P. F., 1993. Revision of the lithostratigraphic units of the coastal plain of Georgia – the Oligocene. Georgia Geologic Survey Bulletin 105, 1–152.Google Scholar
  17. Hulbert, R. C., Jr., 1989. Phylogenetic interrelationships and evolution of North American late Neogene Equidae. In: Prothero, D. R., Schoch, R. M. (Eds.), The Evolution of Perissodactyls. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 176–196.Google Scholar
  18. Hulbert, R. C., Jr., 1993. Taxonomic evolution in North American Neogene horses (subfamily Equinae): the rise and fall of an adaptive radiation. Paleobiology 19, 216–234.Google Scholar
  19. Hulbert, R. C., Jr., MacFadden, B. J., 1991. Morphological transformation and cladogenesis at the base of the adaptive radiation of Miocene hypsodont horses. American Museum Novitates 3000, 1–61.Google Scholar
  20. Hussain, S. T., 1975. Evolutionary and functional anatomy of the pelvic limb in fossil and recent Equidae (Perissodactyla, Mammalia). Anatomy, Histology, Embryology 4, 179–222.Google Scholar
  21. Janis, C. M., 1976. The evolutionary strategy of the Equidae and the origins of rumen and caecal digestion. Evolution 30, 757–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Janis, C. M., Gordon, I. J., Illius, A. W., 1994. Modelling equid/ruminant competition in the fossil record. Historical Biology 8, 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lambe, L. M., 1905. Fossil horses from the Oligocene of the Cypress Hills, Assiniboia. Transactions, Royal Society of Canada, Series 2, 11, 43–52.Google Scholar
  24. MacFadden, B. J., 1987. Fossil horses from “Eohippus” (Hyracotherium) to Equus: scaling, Cope’s Law, and the evolution of body size. Paleobiology 12, 355–369.Google Scholar
  25. MacFadden, B. J., 1992. Fossil Horses: Systematics, Paleobiology, and Evolution of the Family Equidae. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  26. MacFadden, B. J., 1997. Origin and evolution of the grazing guild in New World terrestrial mammals. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12, 182–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. MacFadden, B. J., 1998. Equidae. In: Janis, C. M., Scott, K. M., Jacobs, L. L. (Eds.), Evolution of Tertiary Mammals of North America, Volume One: Terrestrial Carnivores, Ungulates, and Ungulatelike Mammals. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 537–559.Google Scholar
  28. MacFadden, B. J., 2004. Fossil horses – evidence for evolution. Science 307, 1728–1730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. MacFadden, B. J., Hulbert, R. C., Jr., 1988. Explosive speciation at the base of the adaptive radiation of Miocene grazing horses. Nature 336, 466–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marsh, O. C., 1879. Polydactyle horses, recent and extinct. American Journal of Science 17, 499–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Matthew, W. D., 1924. Third contribution to the Snake Creek fauna. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 50, 59–210.Google Scholar
  32. Matthew, W. D., 1932. New fossil mammals from the Snake Creek quarries. American Museum Novitates 540, 1–8.Google Scholar
  33. Merriam, J. C., 1913. New anchitheriine horses from the Great Basin area. University of California Publications, Bulletin of the Department of Geology 7, 419–434.Google Scholar
  34. Osborn, H. F., 1910. The Age of Mammals in Europe, Asia, and North America. Macmillan, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Osborn, H. F., 1918. Equidae of the Oligocene, Miocene, and Pliocene of North America. Iconographic type revision. Memoirs of the American Museum of Natural History, New Series 2, 1–326.Google Scholar
  36. O’Sullivan, J. A., 1995. Skeletal indicators of arboreal and terrestrial positional behavior in didelphid marsupials. M.A. thesis, Hunter College, City University of New York, New York.Google Scholar
  37. O’Sullivan, J. A., 2002. Paleobiology of Archaeohippus (Mammalia; Equidae), a three-toed horse from the Oligocene-Miocene of North America. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.Google Scholar
  38. O’Sullivan, J. A., 2003. A new species of Archaeohippus (Mammalia, Equidae) from the Arikareean of central Florida. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 23, 877–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Patton, T. H., 1969. An Oligocene land vertebrate fauna from Florida. Journal of Paleontology 43, 543–546.Google Scholar
  40. Schlaikjer, E. M., 1935. Contributions to the stratigraphy and paleontology of the Goshen Hole area, Wyoming IV: new vertebrates and the stratigraphy of the Oligocene and early Miocene. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 76, 97–189.Google Scholar
  41. Schlaikjer, E. M., 1937. A study of Parahippus wyomingensis and a discussion of the phylogeny of the genus. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 80, 255–280.Google Scholar
  42. Simpson, G. G., 1930. Tertiary land mammals of Florida. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 59, 149–211.Google Scholar
  43. Simpson, G. G., 1932. Miocene land mammals from Florida. Florida Geological Survey Bulletin 10, 7–41.Google Scholar
  44. Simpson, G. G., 1951. Horses. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  45. Sondaar, P. Y., 1968. The osteology of the manus of fossil and recent Equidae, with special reference to phylogeny and function. Verhandelingen der Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Afd. Natuurkunde eerste reeks 25, 1–76.Google Scholar
  46. Stirton, R. A., 1940. Phylogeny of North American Equidae. University of California Publication, Bulletin of the Department of Geological Science 25, 165–198.Google Scholar
  47. Storer, J. E., Bryant, H. N., 1993. Biostratigraphy of the Cypress Hills Formation (Eocene to Miocene), Saskatchewan: equid types (Mammalia; Perissodactyla) and associated faunal assemblages. Journal of Paleontology 67, 660–669.Google Scholar
  48. Thomason, J. J., 1986. The functional morphology of the manus in the tridactyl equids Merychippus and Mesohippus: paleontological inferences from neontological models. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 6, 143–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Webb, S. D., Hulbert, R. C., Jr., 1986. Systematics and evolution of Pseudhipparion (Mammalia, Equidae) from the Late Neogene of the Gulf Coastal Plain and Great Plains. In: Flanagan, K. M., Lillegraven, J. A. (Eds.), Vertebrates, Phylogeny, and Philosophy. Contributions in Geology, University of Wyoming, Special Paper 3, Laramie, pp. 237–285.Google Scholar
  50. Webb, S. D., Hulbert, R. C., Jr., Lambert, W. D., 1995. Climatic implications of large-herbivore distributions in the Miocene of North America. In: Vrba, E. S., Denton, G. H., Partridge, T. C., Burckle, L. H. (Eds.), Paleoclimate and Evolution with Emphasis on Human Origins. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, pp. 91–108.Google Scholar
  51. White, T. E., 1942. The lower Miocene mammal fauna of Florida. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 92, 1–49.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jay A. O’Sullivan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Exercise Science and Sport StudiesUniversity of TampaTampaUSA

Personalised recommendations