Skip to main content

Stem Cells, Pluralism and Moral Empathy

  • Chapter
Stem Cells, Human Embryos and Ethics
  • 1008 Accesses

In discussions about the morality of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research, the focus is often on the differences. In this essay, two points are made. First, it is argued that different standpoints do not necessarily imply that altogether different values are held. Rather, shared values, including the intrinsic value of embryos (persons or not) and the value of developing medical therapies, may conflict and are weighed differently. Secondly, since we tend to forget or downplay values which we override, it is argued that we need the moral virtue of empathy. Empathy enables us to see overridden values in our own position, it fosters understanding of the weighing made by our opponents, and it stimulates the search for alternatives to Human ES-cell research which respect all values involved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others


  • Damschen, Gregor and Schönecker, Dieter (eds.) (2003). Der moralische Status menschlicher Embryonen, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gert, Bernard (1988). Morality: A New Justification of the Moral Rules, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R.M. (1984). Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method, and Point, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebblethwaite, Brian (1997). Ethics and Religion in a Pluralistic Age, Edinburgh: T&T Clark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kekes, John (1993). The Morality of Pluralism, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Lange, Frits (1995). “Pluralisme en christelijke traditie”, Gereformeerd Theologisch Tijdschrift, 95.3: 100–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Lange, Frits (2003). “Pal staan voor het pluralisme: pleidooi voor een casco-moraal”, Gereformeerd Theologisch Tijdschrift 103.1: 40–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oostveen, Margriet (2001). “Minister Els Borst over het tekort van de nieuwe euthanasiewet: ‘Ik kan me goed voorstellen dat artsen stervenshulp niet melden’.” NRC Handelsblad, Dutch National Evening Paper. April 14, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroten, Egbert (1988). “In Statu Nascendi. De beschermwaardigheid van het menselijk embryo vanuit het gezichtspunt van de christelijke ethiek” (Inaugural address), Utrecht: Utrechtse theologische Reeks 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroten, Egbert (2000). “Waar is dat goed voor? Een theologisch essay over wegen en grenzen in de (bio) technologie.” In: Dick G.A. Koelega and Willem B. Drees (eds.). God & co? Geloven in een technologische cultuur, Kampen: Kok Publishers, pp. 93–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Susan (1992). “Two levels of Pluralism”, Ethics 102: 785–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boer, T.A. (2008). Stem Cells, Pluralism and Moral Empathy. In: Østnor, L. (eds) Stem Cells, Human Embryos and Ethics. Springer, Dordrecht.

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics