Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Modelling of Fatigue Behaviour of Hard Multilayer Nanocoating System in Nanoimpact Test

  • Chapter
Composites with Micro- and Nano-Structure

Part of the book series: Computational Methods in Applied Sciences ((COMPUTMETHODS,volume 9))

Abstract

The chapter presents the basis of the nanoimpact test and the idea of prediction of fracture occurrence, especially fatigue behaviour of nanoimpacted materials. The example of typical nanoimpact test is illustrated. The first part of the investigation is focused on the development of the finite element (FE) model, which is applied to identification of the material model of hard nanocoating in the multilayer system. Beyond this, the model is used to describe the friction contact between die and specimen, the shape of the die, the critical and required number of layers and dimension of investigated domain. Searching for the answers on formulated topics is realized using the inverse and the sensitivity analysis. Selected results indicating the problems with computing time in simulation of nanotests for the multilayer systems are presented in the chapter, as well. The FE model of the test with optimized parameters was developed and the results of chosen macrocrack criterion are shown. In the second part of the work the new approach to analysis of fracture phenomena is introduced as the fatigue criteria, which are used in simulation of nanoimpact test. The review of known fatigue criteria and analysis of fatigue behaviour are presented next and the selection of four of the criteria is justified. Finally, the results of simulations with the fatigue criteria implemented into the FE code for the analysed problem are shown and commented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bao Y (2005) Dependence of ductile crack formation in tensile tests on stress triaxiality, stress and strain ratios. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 72:505–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beake BD (2005) Evaluation of the fracture resistance of DLC coatings on tool steel under dynamic loading. Surface and Coatings Technology 198:90–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Beake BD, Ranganathan N (2006) An investigation of the nanoindentation and nano/micro-tribological behaviour of monolayer, bilayer and trilayer coatings on cemented carbide. Materials Science and Engineering A 23:46–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Beake BD, Smith JF (2004) Nano-impact testing – an effective tool for assessing the resistance of advanced wear-resistant coatings to fatigue failure and delamination. Surface and Coatings Technology 188–189:594–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Beake BD, Lau SP, Smith JF (2004) Evaluating the fracture properties and fatigue wear of tetrahedral amorphous carbon films on silicon by nano-impact testing. Surface and Coatings Technology 177–178:611–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Beake BD, Smith JF, Gray A, Fox-Rabinovich GS, Veldhuis SC, Endrino JL (2007) Investigating the correlation between nano-impact fracture resistance and hardness/modulus ratio from nanoindentation at 25–500 ∘C and the fracture resistance and lifetime of cutting tools with Ti1−xAlxN (x = 0.5 and 0.67) PVD coatings in milling operations. Surface and Coatings Technology 201:4585–4593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bernasconi A, Papadopoulos IV (2005) Efficiency of algorithms for shear stress amplitude calculation in critical plane class fatigue criteria. Computational Materials Science 34:355–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bolotin VV (1999) Mechanics of fatigue. CRC, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bouzakis KD, Vidakis N, Leyendecker T, Lemmer O, Fuss HG, Erkens G (1996) Determination of the fatigue behaviour of thin hard coatings using the impact test and a FEM simulation. Surface and Coatings Technology 86–87:549–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bouzakis KD, Vidakis N, David K (1999) The concept of an advanced impact tester supported by evaluation software for the fatigue strength characterization of hard layered media. Thin Solid Films 355–356:322–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chakraborti PC (2005) Room temperature low cycle fatigue behaviour of two high strength lamellar duplex ferrite–martensite (DFM) steels. International Journal of Fatigue 27:511–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen X, Song J, Kim KS (2006) Low cycle fatigue life prediction of 63Sn–37Pb solder under proportional and non-proportional loading. International Journal of Fatigue 28:757–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Constantinescu A, Charkaluk E, Lederer G, Verge L (2004) A computational approach to thermomechanical fatigue. International Journal of Fatigue 26:805–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Doerner MF, Nix WD (1986) A method for interpreting the data from depth–sensing indentation instruments. Journal of Material Research 1:601–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fisher-Cripps A (2002) Nanoindentation. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jiang Y, Hertel O, Vormwald M (2007) An experimental evaluation of three critical plane multiaxial fatigue criteria. International Journal of Fatigue 29:1490–1502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jindal PC, Santhanam AT, Schleinkofer U, Shuster AF (1999) Performance of PVD TiN, TiCN, and TiAlN coated, cemented carbide tools in turning, International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials 17:163–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Karolczuk A, Macha E (2005) A review of critical plane orientations in multiaxial fatigue failure criteria of metallic materials. International Journal of Fracture 134:267–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kopernik M, Pietrzyk M (2007) Rheological model and mechanical properties of hard nanocoatings in numerical simulation of nanoindentation test. In: Cueto E, Chinesta F (eds) 10th ESAFORM Conference on Material Forming. AIP Conference Proceedings, Melville, New York, 907:659–664

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kopernik M, Pietrzyk M (2007) 2D numerical simulation of elasto-plastic deformation of thin hard coating systems in deep nanoindentation test with sharp indenter. Archives of Metallurgy and Materials 52:299–310

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kopernik M, Szeliga D (2007) Modelling of nanomaterials-sensitivity analysis to determine the nanoindentation test parameters. Computer Methods in Materials Science 7:255–261

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kopernik M, Pietrzyk M, Żmudzki A (2006) Numerical simulation of elasto-plastic deformation of thin hard coating systems in nano-impact test. Computer Methods in Materials Science 6:150–160

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kopernik M, Stanisławczyk A, Kusiak J, Pietrzyk M (2007) Identification of material models in hard system of nanocoatings using metamodel. In: Proceedings of 23rd IFIP TC 7 Conference on System Modelling and Optimization, Krakow (CD-ROM)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kopernik M, Stanisławczyk A, Szeliga D (2007) Problems of material models of hard nanocoatings. In: Proceedings of the 17th International CMM Conference, Lodz, Spala (CD ROM)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kopernik M, Szeliga D, Pietrzyk M (2007) Review of application of numerical methods to identification material model of hard nanocoating. In: Onate E, Owen DRJ, Suarez B (eds) 9th COMPLAS Conf. on Computational Plasticity Fundamentals and Applications, International Center for Numerical Methods in Engineering (CIMNE) Conference Proceedings, Barcelona, Spain, 667–670

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kopernik M, Trebacz L, Pietrzyk M (2007) Simulation of fracture for hard multilayer nanocoating system in impact test. In: Proceedings of the 1st Conference Composites with Micro- and Nano-Structure (CMNS) – Computational Modeling and Experiments, Liptovsky Mikulas, 72–86 (CD-ROM)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kuroda M (2001) Extremely low cycle fatigue life prediction based on a new cumulative fatigue damage model. International Journal of Fatigue 24:699–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lee Y-L, Pan J, Hathaway RB, Barkey ME (2005) Fatigue testing and analysis. Elsevier, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  29. Li X, Bhushan B (2002) Development of a nanoscale fatigue measurement technique and its application to ultrathin amorphous carbon coatings, Scripta Materialia 47:473–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. McClintock FA (1968) A criterion of ductile fracture by growth of holes. Journal of Applied Mechanics 35:363–371

    Google Scholar 

  31. Norberg S, Olson M (2005) A fast, versatile fatigue post-processor and criteria evaluation. International Journal of Fatigue 27:1335–1341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ohata M, Toyoda M (2004) Damage concept for evaluating ductile cracking of steel structure subjected to large-scale cyclic straining. Scientific Technology of Advanced Materials 5:241–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Oliver C, Pharr GM (1992) An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiment. Journal of Material Research 7:1564–1583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Qian J, Fatemi A (1996) Mixed mode fatigue crack growth: a literature survey. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 55:969–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Suresh S (1991) Fatigue of Materials. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wang P, Xu LR (2006) Dynamic interfacial debonding initiation induced by an incident crack. International Journal of Solids and Structures 43:6535–6550

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang YY, Yao WX (2004) Evaluation and comparison of several multiaxial fatigue criteria. International Journal of Fatigue 26:17–25

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Yang X (2005) Low cycle fatigue and cyclic stress ratcheting failure behavior of carbon steel 45 under uniaxial cyclic loading. International Journal of Fatigue 27:1124–1132

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Applied Computer Science and Modelling, AGH University of Science and Technology, Mickiewicza 30, 30-059, Kraków, Poland

    Magdalena Kopernik, Lechosław Trebacz & Maciej Pietrzyk

Authors
  1. Magdalena Kopernik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lechosław Trebacz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maciej Pietrzyk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kopernik, M., Trebacz, L., Pietrzyk, M. (2008). Modelling of Fatigue Behaviour of Hard Multilayer Nanocoating System in Nanoimpact Test. In: Composites with Micro- and Nano-Structure. Computational Methods in Applied Sciences, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6975-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6975-8_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6974-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6975-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation