A New Understanding of Globalization: The Case of the Romà

  • Victòria Miquel-Martí
  • Tere Sordé-Martí
Part of the Globalisation, Comparative Education and Policy Research book series (GCEP, volume 1)

Globalization has been portrayed very often as a one-faced phenomenon that should be fought against. If globalization initially was exclusively characterized as the exportation of Western imperialism to the rest of the world, more recently, it has been interpreted through different lenses. While it is true that globalization has represented the spreading of neo-liberal policies around the world, it bears many other faces that often go ignored. From this perspective, we suggest not to oppose or to defend globalization but to face the inequalities that it generates and to find advantages in the possibilities it generates. The idea is to reorient globalization through this phenomenon, trying to extend social and democratic advancements instead of abandoning them. The debate now centres on shifting this phenomenon towards a more social direction.

Globalization not only serves to enlarge markets and impose neo-liberal policies, but it has also served to extend human rights and other democratic achievements. As Sen (2002) highlights:

Globalisation has contributed to the progress of the world, through travel, trade, migration, spread of cultural influences, and dissemination of knowledge, and understanding (including of science and technology). To have stopped globalisation would have done irreparable harm to the progress of humanity (p. 11).

Analyses that exclusively focus on the negative aspects of globalization have denied the dialogical opportunities opened up by this process that are already creating avenues of participation to globally socially excluded groups like the Romà. As a result of global mobilizations depicted by World Social Forum (WSF), the debate around globalization has moved beyond its exclusively oppositional nature. Instead of opposing it, the challenge now is to ensure that everybody, without exception, can fully participate in this process. Thus, it is necessary to develop a new understanding of globalization.

Keywords

Migration Europe Sine Argentina Defend 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alfageme Chao, A. (2001, September). Dónde y cómo están los escolares gitanos? [Where and how are Romà students]. Diálogo Gitano, 7–8.Google Scholar
  2. Aubert, A., Duque, E., Fisas, M., & Valls, R. (2004). Dialogar y transformar. Pedagogía Crítica del siglo XXI. Barcelona: Editorial Graó.Google Scholar
  3. Aubert, A., & Garcia, C. (2001). Interactividad en el aula. [Interactivity in the classroom].Cuadernos de Pedagogia, 301, 20–24.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Beck, U. (2000). Un nuevo mundo feliz. La precariedad del trabajo en la era de la globalización. [A new happy world. The precariety of work in the globalisation era]. Barcelona: Paidós.Google Scholar
  6. Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1995). The Normal chaos of love. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bernal, J. F. (2002). ¿Y los gitanos de Argentina? [What about the Romà from Argentina?] I Tchatchipen, 37, 15–17.Google Scholar
  8. Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales (BOCC). Diciembre 17, 1999. Informe de la subcomisión para el estudio de la problemática del pueblo gitano. VI legislatura. Número 520. Disponible en: http://www.fsgg.org/Informe%20subcomision.htm.
  9. Cahn, C., & Chirico, D. (1999). A special remedy: Roma and schools for the mentally handicapped in the Czech republic country reports series. Budapest: European Roma Rights Centre.Google Scholar
  10. Chomsky, N. (1994). Keeping the rabble in line:interviews with David Barsamian. Edinburgh, Scotland: AK Press.Google Scholar
  11. Centre of Research in Theories and Practices that Overcome Inequalities [CREA]. (2001). Brudilla Calli: Las Mujeres Gitanas contra la exclusión. Análisis Ex-Post-Facto. [Brudila Callí: Romaní women against exclusion. Analysis Ex-Post-Facto]. Barcelona: Instituto de la Mujer & CREA (Centre de Recerca Social i Educativa).Google Scholar
  12. Centre of Research in Theories and Practices that Overcome Inequalities [CREA]. (2002). Informe final etapa 3: La voz de la mujer gitana. [Final report stage 3: The voice of the Romí]. Barcelona: Instituto de la Mujer, Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología. Ministerio de Trabajo y Asuntos Sociales. Plan Nacional de I+D+I. 2000–2003.Google Scholar
  13. Centro de Investigacion y Desarrollo de la Educación [CIDE]. (2002). Las Desigualdades de la Educación en España, II. [The inequalities in education in Spain]. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación y Cultura, Centro de Investigación y Documentación Educativa.Google Scholar
  14. Cortiade, M., & Duka, J. (1994). International Romani Union in action. Roma, 41, 28–41.Google Scholar
  15. Da Costa, C. (1996). Los gitanos en Brasil. [Romà in Brazil]. I Tchatchipen, 13, 47–50.Google Scholar
  16. De Botton, L., Puigvert, L., & Sánchez, M. (2005). The inclusion of other women: Breaking the silence through dialogic learning. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Elboj, C. P., I., Soler, M., & Valls, R. (2002). Comunidades de aprendizaje. Transformar la educación. [Learning Communities. Transforming education].Barcelona: Editorial Graó.Google Scholar
  18. European Roma Rights Centre [ERRC]. (2002). Barriers to the education of Romà in Europe: A position paper by the European Romà Rights Center. Romà Rights Quarterly.Google Scholar
  19. Flecha, R., Gómez, J., & Puigvert, L. (2003). Contemporary sociological theory. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  20. Flecha, A.; Oliver, E. (2004). Romaní women and Popular Education. Convergence, 37(2), 7–26.Google Scholar
  21. Fundacion Fomento de Estudios Sociales de Sociologia Aplicada [FOESSA]. (1998). Las condiciones de vida de la poblacion pobre en Espana. [The living conditions of the poor population in Spain]. Madrid: Fundación FOESSA.Google Scholar
  22. Fox, J. (2001). Patterns of discrimination, grievances and political activity among Europe’s Roma: A cross-sectional analysis, Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority issues in Europe, 2, 2–24.Google Scholar
  23. Freire, P. (1997). Pedagogy of the heart. New York: The Continuum Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  24. George, S. (2003). The Lugano Report. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  25. Gheorghe, N., & Liegeois, J.-P. (1995). Roma/Gypsies: A European minority. London: Minority Rights Group.Google Scholar
  26. Giddens, A. (1992). The Transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love, and eroticism in modern societies. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  27. Gomez Alonso, J. (2002). Learning communities: When learning in common means school success for all. Multicultural Teaching, 20(2), 13–17.Google Scholar
  28. Gómez Alonso, J., & Vargas, J. 2003. Why Romà do not like mainstream school: A voice of a people without a territory. Harvard Educational Review, 73(4), 559–590.Google Scholar
  29. Grupo Promotor. (1994). Manifiesto de las Mujeres Gitanas Europeas. [Manifest of European Romaní Women]. Acobá Caló, 2(15), 6.Google Scholar
  30. Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Vol. 1. Reasons and the rationalization of society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  31. Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action: Vol. 2. Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  32. Held, D. (1995). Democracy and the global order: from the modern state to cosmopolitan governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  33. Held, D., & McGrew, A. (Eds.). (2000). The global transformations reader. An introduction to the globalisation debate. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  34. IRU. (2001). About denomination of Gypsy people in official documentation of World Conference Against Racism. Paper presented at the World Conference against the Racism, Durban, South Africa. (accessible at: http://www.unionromani.org/new2001–09-03.htm).
  35. Machiels, T. (2002). Keeping the distance or taking the chances. Romà and travellers in Western Europe. Brussels: European Network Against Racism (ENAR).Google Scholar
  36. Meyer, L. H. (2001). Transnational autonomy: Responding to historical injustice in the case of the Saami and Roma peoples. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 8, 263–301.Google Scholar
  37. Morrow, M. (2000). Report from Australia. Paper presented at the V International Romani Union Congress.Google Scholar
  38. Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe [OSCE]. (2000). Report on the situation of the Romà and Sinti in the OSCE area. The Hague: Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. High Commissioner on National Minorities.Google Scholar
  39. Revenga, A., Ringold, D., & Martin Tracy, W. (2002). Poverty and ethnicity. A cross- country study of Romà poverty in Central Europe. (World Bank Technical Paper no.531). Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  40. Ringold, D., Orenstein, M. A., & Wilkens, E. (2003). Romà in an expanding Europe: Breaking the poverty cycle. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  41. Sassen, S. (2003). Contrageografías de la globalización. Género y ciudadanía en los círculos transfronterizos. [Counter geographies of globalisation. Gender and citizenship in the cross-border circles]. Madrid: Traficantes de Sueños.Google Scholar
  42. Scicluna, H. (2003). Roma participation in Europe – The way forward. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
  43. Soler Gallart, M., & Teberosky, A. (Eds.). (2003). Contextos de alfabetización inicial ( Vol. 39). [Contexts of initial literacy]. Barcelona: Editorial Horsori.Google Scholar
  44. Soler-Gallart, M. (2001). Lectura dialògica en la primera infància. [Dialogic literacy in early childhood]. Guix d’Infantil, 3, 12–14.Google Scholar
  45. Sen, A. K. (1999). Democracy as a universal value. Journal of Democracy, 10(3), 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sen, A. (2002). Does globalisation equal Westernization? The Globalist. (accessible at: http://www.theglobalist.com/DBWeb/StoryId.aspx?StoryId=2353).
  47. Stromquist, N. (2002). Education in a globalized world. The connectivity of economic power, technology, and knowledge. Lanham, MA: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  48. Touraine, A. (2000). Can we live together? Equality and Difference. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  49. Vargas, J., & Flecha, R. (2000). El aprendizaje Dialógico como “experto”en resolución de conflictos. Contextos Educativos. [Dialogic learning as expert in conflict resolution]. Revista de Educación., 3, 81–88.Google Scholar
  50. Voulasranta, M. (2003). European Forum For Romà and travellers: From Finish initiative to the Franco-Finnish proposal. Romà Rights, 4.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Victòria Miquel-Martí
    • 1
  • Tere Sordé-Martí
    • 1
  1. 1.Universitat de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations