New ICTs support new ways of tailoring services to the individual needs and desires of customers. Increasingly, what is called personalisation of services is implemented particularly in Internet-based e-commerce applications but other kinds of technologies and services, such as location-based services, RFID, smartcards and biometrics are expected to follow closely and offer even better opportunities for personalised services. The growing popularity of personalisation requires an exploration of the broader and fundamental implications of this phenomenon. Issues related to the categorisation of people, the creation of identities, the (re)structuring of behaviour and the shaping of the overall movement of information and expression within society need consideration when implementing such techniques in organisational (e.g., e-Government) and business processes. More specifically, this chapter deals with privacy, transparency and the quality of personalisation processes, as well as inclusion, exclusion and control. It is argued that the phenomenon of personalisation must be deliberated in light of the broader developments in the area of ubiquitous computing.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
van Barneveld, J., ‘User Interfaces for Personalized Systems. State of the Art’, Enschede: Telematica Instituut, 2003. Available at: https://doc.telin.nl/dscgi/ds.py/Get/File-28132
Bauer, M., and Meints, M. (eds.), Structured Overview on Prototypes and Concepts of Identity Management Systems, FIDIS, Deliverable 3.1, European Union IST FIDIS Project, August 2006. Available at: www.fidis.net.
Bonnet, M., ‘Personalization of Web Services: Opportunities and Challenges’, Ariadne, Issue 28, 2001. Available at: www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue28/personalization/intro.html
Crossly, M., Kings, N.J., Scott, J.R., ‘Profiles–Analysis and Behaviour’, BT Technology Journal, Vol. 21, No. 1, January 2003.
Camp, L.J., ‘Identity in Digital Government’, A Report of the 2003 Civic Scenario Workshop, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA., 2003.
Dworkin, G., The Theory and Practice of Autonomy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988.
Feinberg, J., Harm to Self, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1986.
Friedewald, M., Lindner, R., Wright, D., (eds.), ‘Safeguards in a World of Ambient Intelligence (SWAMI), Threats, Vulnerabilities and Safeguards in Ambient Intelligence’, Deliverable D3, July 2006. Available at: swami.jrc.es
Hildebrandt, M., Gutwirth, S. (eds.), Profiling: Implications for Democracy and Rule of Law, FIDIS Deliverable 7.4, European Union IST FIDIS Project, Brussels 2005. Available at: www.fidis.net
Lips, A.M.B., van der Hof, S. Prins, J.E.J, Schudelaro, A.A.P., Issues of Online Personalisation in Commercial and Public Service Delivery, Wolf Legal Publishers, Tilburg, 2005.
Lyon, D., (ed.), Surveillance as Social Sorting. Privacy, Risk and Digital Discrimination, Routledge, London/New York, 2003.
Mably, K., ‘Privacy vs. Personalization’, 2000, Cyber Dialogue Inc. Available at: www.cyberdialogue.com.
Mobasher, B. Cooley, R., Srivastava, J., ‘Automatic Personalization Based on Web Usage Mining. Web usage mining can help improve the scalability, accuracy, and flexibility of recommender systems’, Communications of the ACM, Association for Computing Machinery, August 2000, pp. 142 ff.
Nissenbaum, H., ‘Privacy as Contextual Integrity’, Washington Law Review, No. 79, 2004, pp. 101–139.
Nguyen, D.H., Mynatt, E.D., ‘Privacy Mirrors: Understanding and Shaping Socio-technical Ubiquitous Computing Systems’, Georgia Institute of Technology Technical Report, 2002. Available at: www.erstwhile.org/writings/PrivacyMirrors.pdf
O’Looney, J., ‘Personalization of Government Internet Services’, 2002. Available at: www.digitalgovernment.org/library/library/dgo2001/DGOMAC/MEDIA/OLOO.pdf
Prins, J.E.J., ‘The Propertization of Personal Data and Identities’, Electronic Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2004.
Prins, J.E.J., ‘Property and Privacy: European Perspectives and the Commodification of our Identity’, in: Guibault, Hugenholtz (eds), The Future of the Public Domain, Kluwer Law International, Alphen a.d. Rijn, The Hague, 2006, pp. 233–257.
Paternoster, C., Searby, S., ‘Personalise or Perish?’, White Paper BT Exact Technologies, 2002.
Phillips, David J., ‘From Privacy to Visibility: Context, Identity, and Power in Ubiquitous Computing Environments’, Social Text, Vol. 23, No. 2, Duke University Press, Durham, 2005.
Shahabi, S., Chen, Y. ‘Web Information Personalization: Challenges and Approaches’, 2003. Available at: infolab.usc.edu/DocsDemos/DNIS2003.pdf
Smyth, B., Cotter, P., ‘A Personalized Television Listings Service. Mixing the Collaborative Recommendation Approach with Content-Based Filtering Seems to Bring Out the Best in Both Methods’, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 43, No. 8, Association for Computing Machinery, Wash., August 2000, pp. 107–111.
Vedder, A., ‘Medical Data, New Information Technologies and the Need for Normative Principles Other Than Privacy Rules’, in Freeman, M., Lewis, A. (eds.), Law and Medicine, Current Legal Issues, Vol. 3, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000, pp. 441–459.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van der Hof, S., Prins, C. (2008). Personalisation and its Influence on Identities, Behaviour and Social Values. In: Hildebrandt, M., Gutwirth, S. (eds) Profiling the European Citizen. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6914-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6914-7_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6913-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6914-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)