Guidelines to Prevent the Malevolent Use of Physicians in War

  • Michael E. Frisina
Part of the International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New book series (LIME, volume 41)

The question of how to prevent the malevolent use of physicians in war is not new. Historically the lines were far more distinct than they are today. When physicians were clearly noncombatants in a civilian culture tending to the sick and wounded of belligerent, armed combatants, regardless of country of origin, protecting and preserving the integrity of the healing arts was less complicated. Today physicians wear the uniform of their countries, travel imbedded with the fighting forces to intervene and to provide care and treatment to the sick or wounded soldier as quickly as possible with the best expectation of survival. Military physicians participate in medical research and development with suspicion regarding the benevolent nature of the research as to the outcomes and use for improving the means of healing as opposed to improving the means of killing and inflicting harm. The use of medical knowledge and those who apply this knowledge in a war scenario continually face the ethical burden to preserve the caring and compassionate nature of the healing arts.


Medical Ethic Medical Professional Geneva Convention World Medical Association Declaration Military Medicine 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. American Medical Association. 2004. Code of Medical Ethics: Current Opinions with Annotations, 2004–2005 ed. Chicago, IL: AMA.Google Scholar
  2. Beam, Thomas E. and Linette R. Sparacino, eds. 2003. Military Medical Ethics, vols. 1–2 (Textbooks of Military Medicine series). Washington, DC: Office of the Surgeon General, Department of the Army, and Borden Institute.Google Scholar
  3. Bloche, M. Gregg and Jonathan H. Marks. 2005. When doctors go to war. N Engl J Med 352.1: 3–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clark, Peter A. 2006. Medical ethics at Guantanamo Bay and Abu Ghraib: the problem of dual loyalty. J Law Med Ethics 34.3: 570–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen, Steven P., M. Gregg Bloche, and Jonathan H. Marks. 2005. Doctors and interrogation. N Engl J Med 353: 1633–1634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Collins, Susan D. 2006. Aristotle and the Rediscovery of Citizenship. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Dienstag, Abbe L. 1982. Fedorenko v. United States: war crimes, the defense of duress, and American Nationality Law. Columbia Law Rev 82.1: 120–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Entralgo, P. Lain. 1969. Doctor and Patient. Partridge, F., trans. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  9. Geneva Convention (III) relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War. 1949. Geneva (12 August).Google Scholar
  10. Harbage, Alfred, ed. 1969. The life of Henry the Fifth. In William Shakespeare: The Complete Works. New York: Viking Penguin. Page 767, lines 20–69.Google Scholar
  11. Holmes, D. and A. Perron. 2007. Violating ethics: unlawful combatants, national security and health professionals. J Med Ethics 33: 143–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hood, Catherine A. et al. 1998. Videos, photographs, and patient consent. BMJ 316: 1009–1011.Google Scholar
  13. Hornaday, Ann. 2006. The war tapes: three soldiers on shifting sands. Washington Post, 30 June.Google Scholar
  14. Howe, Edmund G. 1986. Ethical issues regarding mixed agency of military physicians. Soc Sci Med 23.8: 803–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Koch, Tom. 2006. Weaponising medicine: ‘Tutti fratelli’, no more. J Med Ethics 32: 249–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lifton, Robert Jay. 1986. The Nazi Doctors. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  17. Priest, Dana and Barton Gellman. 2002. US decries abuse but defends interrogations: ‘stress and duress’ tactics used on terrorism suspects held in secret overseas facilities. Washington Post, 26 December.Google Scholar
  18. Pruitt, Jr., Basil A. 1993. Trauma care in war and peace: the Army/ASST synergism: 1992 Fitts Lecture. J Trauma 35.1: 78–87s.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ryle, John A. 1938. Foreword. In The Doctor’s View of War, ed. Horace Joules, 7–10. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  20. Sidel, Victor W. and Barry Levy, eds. 1997. War and Public Health. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Singh, Jerome A. and T.L. DePellegrin. 2003. Images of war and medical ethics. BMJ 326 (12 April): 774–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stephens, Joe. 2005. Army doctors implicated in abuse: medical workers helped tailor interrogations of detainees, article says. Washington Post, 6 January 2005: A8.Google Scholar
  23. The Congressional Medal of Honor Society. Cited 4 June 2007.
  24. The United States Military Academy Honor Code. Cited 4 June 2007.
  25. Walzer, Michael. 2000. Just and Unjust Wars, 3rd ed. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  26. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. 2004. WMA General Assembly, Tokyo 2004. Cited 4 June 2007.

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael E. Frisina
    • 1
  1. 1.Tuomey Healthcare System in SumterUSA

Personalised recommendations