Skip to main content

The History and Distinctions of Conservation Biology

  • Chapter
Conservation Biology

In this chapter you will learn about:

  1. 1.

    The origins and history of conservation and conservation biology

  2. 2.

    The conceptual distinctions of conservation biology

Throughout most of human history, an interest in the conservation of plants and animals, much less a passionate dedication to it, has not been considered a “normal” way of thinking. This is not just the case in ordinary society, but even in the scientific community. Nevertheless, this “different” approach to the natural world, and to science, was given voice and direction at a remarkable meeting in 1978. In that year a group of academic scientists, zookeepers, and wildlife conservationists attended a banquet at the San Diego Wild Animal Park. There biologist Michael Soulé made an impassioned plea to his colleagues: with world extinction rates estimated to be at their highest levels in 65 million years, it was time for academics and conservationists to join forces to save threatened and endangered species (Gibbons 1992). Soulé’s words sparked both controversy and criticism, but few were left unmoved. That meeting, now ambitiously called the First International Conference on Conservation Biology, led to new beginnings. A landmark publication that would become a foundational statement of the new discipline’s identity, Conservation Biology: An Evolutionary-Ecological Perspective (Soulé and Wilcox 1980) resulted, a new scientific organization, the Society for Conservation Biology, was created, and a new discipline, conservation biology, was born.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alvard, M. S. 1993. Testing the “ecologically noble savage” hypothesis: interspecific prey choices by Piro hunters of Amazonian Peru. Human Ecology 21:355–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous, 1871. The Washburn Expedition. Parts 1 and 2. The Overland Monthly 6(5, 6), May, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apffel-Marglin, F., and P. Parajuli. 2000. “Sacred grove” and ecology: ritual and science. In: C. K. Chapple and M. E. Tucker (eds) Hinduism and ecology: the intersection of earth, sky and water. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 291–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R., J. S. Dixon, V. H. Calahane, W. W. Chase, and W. L. McAtee. 1937. Statement of policy. Journal of Wildlife Management 1:1–2

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunnell, F. L., and L. A. Dupuis. 1995. Conservation biology’s literature revisited: wine or vinaigrette? Wildlife Society Bulletin 23:56–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Callicott, J. B. 1990. Whither conservation ethics? Conservation Biology 4:15–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clepper, H. 1966. Origins of American conservation. Ronald, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Coggins, C. 2003. The tiger and the pangolin: nature, culture, and conservation in China. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu, HI

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, E. T., and A. Wedderburn (eds). 1908. The works of John Ruskin, Volume XXXIV. George Allen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, H. E. 1999. The lurking inconsistency. Conservation Biology 13:693–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickman, D., and L. A. Leefers. 2003. The forests of Michigan. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, B. 1997. Ornithological observations. Paragon Review 5. Available from http://www.hull.ac.uk/oldlib/archives/ paragon/1996/morris.html (accessed July 2007)

  • Errington, P. L., and F. N. Hamerstrom, Jr. 1937. The evaluation of nesting losses and juvenile mortality of the ring-necked pheasant. Journal of Wildlife Management 1:3–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frome, M. 1987. The national parks, 3rd edition. Rand McNally, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, A. 1992. Conservation biology in the fast lane. Science 255:20–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Groom, M. J., G. K. Meffe, and C. R. Carroll. 2006. Principles of conservation biology, 3rd edition. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Guha, R. 2000. Environmentalism: a global history. Longman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, E., and H. Cairns (eds). 1961. Plato: the collected dialogues. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Holdgate, M. 1999. The green web: a union for world conservation. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, M. L., Jr. 2002. Fundamentals of conservation biology, 2nd edition. Blackwell Science, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Leal, D. R. 1998. Cooperating on the commons: case studies in community fisheries. In: P. J. Hill and R. E. Meiners (eds) Who owns the environment? Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD, pp 283–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, Aldo. 1966. A sand county almanac with essays on conservation from Round River. Sierra Club/Ballantine, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • MacBean, A. 2007. China’s environment: problems and policies. World Economy 30:292–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, J. 1989. Reclaiming paradise: the global environmental movement. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN

    Google Scholar 

  • McEvoy, A. 1988. Toward an interactive theory of nature and culture: ecology, production, and cognition in the California fishing industry. In: D. Worster (ed) The ends of the Earth: perspectives on modern environmental history. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 211–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Mcfarlane, A. 1987. The culture of capitalism. Basil Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, J. R. 2003. Observations on the nature and culture of environmental history. History and Theory, Theme Issue 42:5–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meffe, G. K., and C. Ronald Carroll. 1997. Principles of conservation biology. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, W. 1905. Defense of Guenevere and other poems. Longmans, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Muir, J. 1896. Address on the Sierra Forest Reservation. Sierra Club Bulletin 1(7):275–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Naess, A. 1986. Intrinsic value: will the defenders of nature please rise? In: M. E. Soulé (ed) Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, pp 504–515

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, R. F. 1989. The rights of nature. The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI

    Google Scholar 

  • National Park Service Organic Act. 1916. 39 Stat. 535, 16 U.S.C. 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Petulla, J. M. 1977. American environmental history. Boyd and Fraser, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Primack, R. B. 2004. A primer of conservation biology, 3rd edition. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Primack, R. B. 2006. Essentials of conservation biology, 4th edition. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullin, A. S. 2002. Conservation biology. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyne, S. J. 2001. Fire: a brief history. University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf, D. J. 1995. Six biological reasons why the Endangered Species Act doesn’t work and what to do about it. In: D. Ehrenfeld (ed) Readings from conservation biology: the social dimension–ethics, policy, management, development, economics, education. Blackwell Science, Cambridge, MA, pp 86–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Roosevelt, T. 1926. State papers as governor and president 1899–1909. Scribner, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, S. 1999. Wilderness preservation and biodiversity conservation–keeping Divergent goals distinct. BioScience 49:405–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff, D. 1988. The contribution of population and community biology to conservation science. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 19:473–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soulé, M. E. 1985. What is conservation biology? BioScience 35:727–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soulé, M. E. (ed). 1986. Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Soulé, M. E. 1987. History of the Society for Conservation Biology: how and why we got here. Conservation Biology 1:4–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soulé, M. E., and B. A. Wilcox (eds). 1980. Conservation biology: an evolutionary-ecology approach. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegner, W. E. 1998. Marking the sparrow’s fall: the making of the American West. Henry Holt, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wordsworth, W. 1975. In: W. Davies William Wordsworth: selected poems. Dent and Sons, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2008). The History and Distinctions of Conservation Biology. In: Conservation Biology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6891-1_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics