In this chapter, we assign to every properly paraconsistent extension L of minimal logic an intermediate logic L int and negative logic Lneg called intuitionistic and negative counterparts of L, respectively. It will be proved that the negative counterpart Lneg explicates the structure of contradictions of paraconsistent logic L. We show that both counterparts Lint and Lneg are faithfully embedded into the original logic L. Finally, we investigate a question: to what extent is a logic L ∈ Par determined by its counterparts? As a first step, we study paraconsistent extensions of the logic\({\rm Le' : = Li } \cap {\rm Ln = Lj + }\left\{ { \bot \vee \left( { \bot \to p} \right)} \right\}.\)
The class of extensions of this logic has a nice property that every logic L ∈ εLe′ ∩ Par is uniquely determined by its intuitionistic and negative counterparts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2008). The Class of Extensions of Minimal Logic. In: Constructive Negations and Paraconsistency. Trends in Logic, vol 26. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6867-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6867-6_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6866-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6867-6
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)