Testing indicators of epiphytic lichen diversity: a case study in N Italy

  • Juri Nascimbene
  • Pier Luigi Nimis
  • Lorenzo Marini
Original Paper
Part of the Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation book series (TOBC, volume 7)


The predictability of a standardized and widely used biomonitoring method for estimating total lichen diversity on trunks (LDV-index) was tested. The study was carried out in Veneto (NE Italy), on 34 randomly selected trees in five sites in different landscape contexts. Two sets of biodiversity data were obtained from each tree: (1) the LDV index based on species frequency within a standard sampling grid positioned on a limited part of the trunks only (2) the total number of species found on the trunks. Total species richness on trunks is significantly related with the LDV index, which suggests that the LDV standard methodology can be used also for estimates of lichen diversity. Even a LDV index based on macrolichens, or on large-lobed foliose lichens only, still permits reliable estimates of total diversity on the trunks.


Biodiversity Lichen Diversity Value Macrolichens Simple linear regression Species richness 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Amman K, Herzig R, Liebendörfer L, Urech M (1987) Multivariate correlation of deposition data of 8 different air pollutants to lichen data in a small town in Switzerland. Adv Aerobiol 51:401–406Google Scholar
  2. AA.VV. (2001) I.B.L. Indice di Biodiversità Lichenica. Serie Manuali e Linee Guida 2. ANPA, RomeGoogle Scholar
  3. Asta J, Erhardt W, Ferretti M, Fornasier F, Kirschbaum U, Nimis PL, Purvis OW, Pirintsos S, Scheidegger C, van Haluwyn C, Wirth V (2002) Mapping lichen diversity as an indicator of environmental quality. In: Nimis PL, Scheidegger C, Wolseley PA (eds), Monitoring with lichens—Monitoring lichens, vol. 7(4). NATO Science Series, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 273–279Google Scholar
  4. Bergamini A, Scheidegger C, Stofer S, Carvalho P, Davey S, Dietrich M, Dubs F, Farkas E, Groner U, Kärkkäinen K, Keller C, Lökös L, Lommi S, Máguas C, Mitchell R, Pinho P, Rico VJ, Aragón G, Truscott AM, Wolseley P, Watt A (2005) Performance of macrolichens and lichen genera as indicators of lichen species richness and composition. Conserv Biol 19:1051–1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brunialti G, Giordani P, Isocrono D, Loppi S (2002) Evaluation of data quality in lichen biomonitoring studies: the Italian experience. Environ Monit Assess 75:271–280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Castello M, Skert N (2005) Evaluation of lichen diversity as an indicator of environmental quality in the North Adriatic submediterranean region. Sci Total Environ 336:201–214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cislaghi C, Nimis PL (1997) Lichens, air pollution and lung cancer. Nature 387:463–464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Culberson W, Culberson C (1994) Secondary metabolites as a tool in Ascomycete systematics: lichenized fungy. In: Hawksworth DL, (ed), Ascomycetes systematics. Problems and perspectives in the nineties. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, Boston, London, pp 155–163Google Scholar
  9. Kerr JT, Sugar A, Packer L (2000) Indicator taxa, rapid biodiversity assessment, and nestedness in an endangered ecosystem. Conserv Biol 14:1726–1734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Landers PB, Verner J, Thomas JW (1988) Ecological uses of vertebrate indicator species: a critique. Conserv Biol 2:316–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lawton JH, Bignell BL, Bolton B, Bloemers GF, Eggleton P, Hammond PM, Hodda M, Holt RD, Larsen TB, Mawdsley NA, Stork NE, Srivastava DS, Watt AD (1998) Biodiversity inventories, indicator taxa and effects of habitat modification in tropical forest. Nature 391:72–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lindenmayer DB, Margules CR, Botkin DB (2000) Indicators of biodiversity for ecologically sustainable forest management. Conserv Biol 14:941–950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McCune B, Dey JP, Peck JE, Cassel D, Heiman K, Will-Wolf S, Neitlich N (1997) Repeatability of community data: species richness versus gradient scores in large-scale lichen studies. Bryologist 100:40–46Google Scholar
  14. Nimis PL, Lazzarin A, Gasparo D (1991) Lichens as bioindicators of air pollution by SO2 in the Veneto Region (NE Italy). Stud Geobotan 11:3–76Google Scholar
  15. Noss RF (1990) Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Conserv Biol 4:355–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. SAS Institute Inc. (1989). SAS/STAT® User’s Guide, Version 6, 4th. Ed., Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  17. Scheidegger C, Groner U, Keller C, Stofer S (2002) Biodiversity assessment tools—Lichens. In: Nimis PL, Scheidegger C, Wolseley PA (eds), Monitoring with lichens—Monitoring lichens, vol. 7(4). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 359–365Google Scholar
  18. VDI (Verein Deutscher Ingenieure) (2006). Biological measurement procedures for determining and evaluating the effects of ambient air pollution by means of lichens (bioindication). Mapping the diversity of epiphytic lichens as an indicator of air quality. Richtlinie 3799, Blatt 1. Beuth-Verlag GmbH, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  19. Will-Wolf S, Esseen PA, Neitlich P (2002) Monitoring biodiversity and ecosystem function: forests. In: Nimis PL, Scheidegger C, Wolseley PA (eds), Monitoring with lichens—Monitoring lichens, vol. 7(4). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Th Netherlands, pp 203–222Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juri Nascimbene
    • 1
  • Pier Luigi Nimis
    • 1
  • Lorenzo Marini
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of TriesteTriesteItaly
  2. 2.Department of Environmental Agronomy and Crop ProductionUniversity of PadovaLegnaro, PadovaItaly

Personalised recommendations