Abstract
The ideal of distributive justice as a means of ensuring fair distribution of social opportunities is a cornerstone of contemporary feminist theory. Feminists from various disciplines have developed arguments to support the redistribution of the work of care through institutional mechanisms. I discuss the limits of such distribution under the conditions of theories that do not idealize human agents as independent beings. People’s reliance on care, understood as a response to needs, is pervasive and infuses almost all human interaction. I argue that the effect of care on shaping the social opportunities of all individuals is huge, although often invisible. Much of the optimism of theories of distributive justice comes from ignoring or downplaying the way in which care influences most factors of social success. Jonathan Wolff distinguished between three types of resources whose fair distribution is important: internal, external and structural. Care, I argue, does not fit well in any of these types. Inseparably interwoven with relational realities, care cuts across these categories and thus poses a challenge to the feasibility of equal chances. I focus on the under-analyzed issue of bad care and show how difficult it is to dismantle legacies of bad care. Their effect on even close-to-ideal social arrangements is too significant to be disregarded, yet very difficult to tackle through institutional mechanisms. A commitment to certain elements of individual ethics – as opposed to merely political institutions – is required in order to bridge the gap between ideal theories of justice and feasible practical aims.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, E. 1999. ‘What is the Point of Equality?’ Ethics 109(2): 287–337.
Baier, A.C. 1994. Moral Prejudices: Essays on Ethics (Harvard: Harvard University Press).
Benjamin, J. 1988. The Bonds of Love: Psychoanalysis, Feminism and the Problem of Domination (New York: Pantheon Books).
Bubeck, D.E. 1999. ‘A Feminist Approach to Citizenship’. In O. Hufton and Y. Kravaritou (eds.) Gender and the Use of Time (The Hague: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 401–428.
Card, C. 1996. The Unnatural Lottery: Character and Moral Luck (Philadelphia: Temple University Press).
Cassidy, L. 2006. ‘That Many of Us Should Not Parent. In Hypatia 21(4): 40–57.
Dillon, A. 1999. The Ethical Education of Self-Talk. In M.S. Katz, N. Noddings and K.A. Strike (eds.) Justice and Caring. The Search for Common Ground in Education (New York and London: Teachers College Press).
Dworkin, R. 2000. Sovereign Virtue. The Theory and Practice of Equality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Fabre, C. 2006. Whose Body Is It Anyway? Justice and the Integrity of the Person (New York: Oxford University Press).
Fraser, N. 1994. ‘After the Family Wage: Gender Equity and the Welfare State’. In Political Theory 22(4): 591–618.
Gheaus, A. 2006. ‘Gender Dimensions of the Romanian Tutoring System’. In J. Sempruch, K. Willems and C. Casarella (eds.) Multiple Marginalities. An Intercultural Perspective on Gender in Education (Kongstein: Helmer Verlag), 264–278.
Gheaus, A. 2007. ‘Irreversible Moral Damage’. In B. Schreier (ed.) Culture and Irreversibility (Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press), 169–186.
Gornick, J.C. and M.K. Meyers. 2003. Families That Work: Policies for Reconciling Parenthood and Employment (New York: Russell Sage Foundation).
Held, V. 1993. Feminist Morality: Transforming Culture, Society and Politics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Held, V. 1997. ‘Feminism and Moral Theory’. In D.T. Meyers (ed.) Feminist Social Thought: A Reader (New York: Routledge).
Kittay, E.F. 1999. Love’s Labor: Essays on Women, Equality, and Dependency (New York: Routledge).
LaFollette, H. 1980. ‘Licensing Parents’. In Philosophy and Public Affaires 9(2): 182–197.
Noddings, N. 2002. Starting at Home. Caring and Social Policy (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press).
Rawls, J. 1972. A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Ruddick, S. 1989. Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace (Boston: Beacon Press).
Ruddick, S. 1998. ‘Care as Labor and Relationship’. In J.G. Haber and M.S. Halfon (eds.) Norms and Values: Essays on the Work of Virginia Held (Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers), 3–25.
Tronto, J. 1993. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care (New York: Routledge).
Williams, B. 1981. Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Wolff, J. 2003. The Message of Redistribution. Disadvantage, Public Policy and the Human Good: a Catalyst Working Paper (London: Catalyst).
Young, I.M. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gheaus, A. (2009). The Challenge of Care to Idealizing Theories of Distributive Justice. In: Tessman, L. (eds) Feminist Ethics and Social and Political Philosophy: Theorizing the Non-Ideal. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6841-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6841-6_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6840-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6841-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)