Skip to main content

L’Imagination au Pouvoir: Comparing John Rawls’s Method of Ideal Theory with Iris Marion Young’s Method of Critical Theory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter compares the philosophical methods used respectively by John Rawls and Iris Marion Young. Rawls’s theory is ideal in several interrelated methodological respects: he emphasizes principle over practice; he relies on a fictional reasoning process; and his theory is designed for an imagined world that lacks many problematic aspects of the real world. Young’s method, which she characterizes as critical theory, is non-ideal in all the respects that Rawls’s method is ideal. Young emphasizes practice; she respects the reasoning of actual people; and she directly addresses existing injustices. If Young has been able to develop philosophical ideals of justice that are more comprehensive, relevant, and substantively acceptable than Rawls’s, I suggest that one reason may be the non-ideal aspects of her methodology. In the end, however, Young’s philosophical contributions cannot be attributed only to her method; they are also the product of her unique political passion and creative imagination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Benhabib, S. 1992. Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaggar, A.M. 1993. ‘Taking Consent Seriously: Feminist Practical Ethics and Actual Moral Dialogue,’ The Applied Ethics Reader, Eds. E. Winkler and J. Coombs (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kittay, E. 1999. Love’s Labor: Essays on Women, Equality, and Dependency (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. 2004. ‘“Ideal Theory” as Ideology,’ in Moral Psychology: Feminist Ethics and Social Theory, Eds. P. DesAutels and M. Urban Walker (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Okin, S.M. 1989. Justice, Gender and the Family (New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, M. 1998. Moral Understandings: A Feminist Study in Ethics (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I.M. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I.M. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alison M. Jaggar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jaggar, A.M. (2009). L’Imagination au Pouvoir: Comparing John Rawls’s Method of Ideal Theory with Iris Marion Young’s Method of Critical Theory. In: Tessman, L. (eds) Feminist Ethics and Social and Political Philosophy: Theorizing the Non-Ideal. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6841-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics