Abstract
This chapter compares the philosophical methods used respectively by John Rawls and Iris Marion Young. Rawls’s theory is ideal in several interrelated methodological respects: he emphasizes principle over practice; he relies on a fictional reasoning process; and his theory is designed for an imagined world that lacks many problematic aspects of the real world. Young’s method, which she characterizes as critical theory, is non-ideal in all the respects that Rawls’s method is ideal. Young emphasizes practice; she respects the reasoning of actual people; and she directly addresses existing injustices. If Young has been able to develop philosophical ideals of justice that are more comprehensive, relevant, and substantively acceptable than Rawls’s, I suggest that one reason may be the non-ideal aspects of her methodology. In the end, however, Young’s philosophical contributions cannot be attributed only to her method; they are also the product of her unique political passion and creative imagination.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Benhabib, S. 1992. Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics (New York: Routledge).
Jaggar, A.M. 1993. ‘Taking Consent Seriously: Feminist Practical Ethics and Actual Moral Dialogue,’ The Applied Ethics Reader, Eds. E. Winkler and J. Coombs (Oxford: Blackwell).
Kittay, E. 1999. Love’s Labor: Essays on Women, Equality, and Dependency (New York: Routledge).
Mills, C. 2004. ‘“Ideal Theory” as Ideology,’ in Moral Psychology: Feminist Ethics and Social Theory, Eds. P. DesAutels and M. Urban Walker (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers).
Okin, S.M. 1989. Justice, Gender and the Family (New York: Basic Books).
Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Walker, M. 1998. Moral Understandings: A Feminist Study in Ethics (New York: Routledge).
Young, I.M. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
Young, I.M. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jaggar, A.M. (2009). L’Imagination au Pouvoir: Comparing John Rawls’s Method of Ideal Theory with Iris Marion Young’s Method of Critical Theory. In: Tessman, L. (eds) Feminist Ethics and Social and Political Philosophy: Theorizing the Non-Ideal. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6841-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6841-6_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6840-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6841-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)