Patterns of Cenozoic Extensional Tectonism in the South Balkan Extensional System

  • B. Clark Burchfiel
  • Robert W. King
  • Radoslav Nakov
  • Tzanko Tzankov
  • Nikola Dumurdzanov
  • Todor Serafi movski
  • Angel Todosov
  • Bilbil Nurce
Conference paper
Part of the NATO Science Series: IV: Earth and Environmental Sciences book series (NAIV, volume 81)

The present day tectonic pattern of the Balkan Peninsula has evolved from three major periods of mainly extensional tectonism: (i) Paleogene extension that is difficult to characterize because its relation to the closing of the Vardar Ocean remains uncertain; (ii) Early to Late Miocene extension related to rollback at the Hellenic subduction zone; and (iii) Late Miocene to Recent extension related to continued trench rollback, but modified by the development of the North Anatolian fault zone and the rapid movement of the Aegean crust to the SSW.

Paleogene extension occurred during and shortly after the time final closure of the Vardar Ocean. The timing of Vardar closing remains uncertain, but is between the early and late Eocene and may be diachronous. Extension occurs from eastern Macedonia through western Bulgaria and northern Greece to northwestern Turkey and lies within a region of thickened crust that may be at least partly undergoing shortening contemporaneous with the earliest stages of extension. However, the exact timing relations between extension and shortening remains unclear, and some evidence suggest they are locally contemporaneous. The tectonic setting appears to be one of transition from subduction related convergence and shortening to subduction rollback convergence with extension. The interpretations of the dynamics for the Paleogene extension are currently controversial.

By Early or Middle Miocene time, extension within the Balkans was characterized by WSW-ESE extension in western Bulgaria and eastern Macedonia. The NNW striking normal faults were part of an evolving extensional system that was part of the regional Aegean realm and can be related to trench rollback and rotation of large crustal fragments. Short periods of Early or Middle Miocene local compression occur in western Bulgaria and eastern Macedonia that may be related to the time when small, but thick crustal fragments entered the northern Hellenic subduction zone in Albania. Three belts of folds are present in the Thrace basin and are probably related to local transpression along right-lateral strike-slip faults that may be precursors to formation of the North Antatolian fault zone. The age of this folding is poorly constrained and is bracketed only between earliest Miocene and latest Miocene.

Beginning in Late Miocene time the pattern of extension within the Balkans progressively evolved related to complex events in the rollback of the Hellenic subducted slab both to the south and to the west and with the initiation of rightlateral strike slip along the southern branch of the North Anatolian fault zone. E- W extension migrated progressively from western Bulgaria into central Macedonia and Albania, followed to the east by N–S extension that migrated from east to west across central and western Bulgaria into eastern Macedonia. This pattern of faulting dominates the present tectonic pattern in the Balkan Peninsula. The rapid Pliocene development of the northern branch of the North Anatolian fault zone partially decoupled the rapid SSW movement of an Aegean plate from slow N–S extension that increased in magnitude from central Bulgaria and Macedonia into northern Greece.

The present active pattern of tectonism is characterized by a narrow zone of shortening east of the northwest part of the Hellenic trench, that rapidly changes to E–W extension in central Albania and western Macedonia. GPS data and only rare geological data suggest the transitional zone may be marked by distributed right-lateral strike-slip. Slow N–S extension dominates eastern Macedonia and Bulgaria with associated local strike-slip faulting. Although weakly developed, the seismicity generally supports this pattern of tectonism. Slip-rates on faults probably increases southward into northern Greece, a testable hypothesis, based on GPS data that show increasing southward velocity relative to Eurasia. GPS data shows the abrupt change to rapid strike-slip along the North Anatolian fault. The slow N–S extension in the southern Balkan Peninsula may be related to the southward pull of the Aegean plate, with possible slow counterclockwise rotation of the western part of the North Anatolian fault zone.

Keywords

cenozoic extension South Balkan 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bonev, N., Burg, J.-P., Ivanov, Z., 2006, Structural evolution of an extensional gneiss dome–the Kesibir-Kardomos dome, East Rhodope, Bulgaria: International Journal of Earth Sciences 95, 318–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, S. A. M., Robertson, A. H. F., 2004, Evidence for Neotethys rooted within the Vardar suture zone from the Voras massif, northernmost Greece: Tectonophysics 381, 143–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burchfiel, B. C., Nakov, R., Tzankov, T., Royden, L. H., 2000, Cenozoic extension in Bulgaria and northern Greece: The northern part of the Aegean extensional regime, in Bozkurt, E., Winchester, J. A., and Piper, J. D. A. (eds.), Tectonics and magmatism in Turkey and surrounding area: Geological Society [London] Special Publication 173, 325–352.Google Scholar
  4. Burchfiel, B. C., Nakov, R., Tzankov, T., 2003, Evidence from the Mesta half graben, SW Bulgaria, for the late Eocene beginning of Aegean extension in the Central Balkan Peninsula: Tectonophysics 375, 61–76, doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2003.09.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burchfiel, B. C., Todosov, A., King, R..W., Kotzev, V., Dumurdanov, N., Sereafimovski, T., Nurce, B., 2006, GPS results for Macedonia and its importance for the tectonics of the southern Balkan Extensional regime: Tectonophysics 413, 239–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Catlos, E. J., Cemen, I., 2005, Monazite ages and the evolution of the Menderes Massif, western Turkey: International Journal of Earth Sciences 94, 204–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dinter, D. A., Royden, L. H., 1993, Late Cenozoic extension in northeastern Greece: Strymon Valley detachment system and Rhodope metamorphic core complex: Geology 21, 45–48, doi: 10.1130/0091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dumurdzanov, N., Serafimovski, T., Burchfiel, B. C., 2004, Evolution of the Neogene-Pleistocene basins of Macedonia: Geological Society of America Digital Map and Chart Series 1 (accompanying notes), 20 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Dumurdzanov, N., Serafimovski, T., Burchfiel, B. C., 2005, Cenozoic tectonics of Macedonia and its relation to the South Balkan extensional regime: Geosphere 1, 1, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harkovska, A., 1983, Spatial and temporal elations between volcanic activity and sedimentation in the stratified Paleogene from the central parts of the Mesta Graben southwest Bulgaria: Geologica Balcanica 13, 2, 3–30.Google Scholar
  11. Harkovska, A., 1984, Tertiary magmotectonic zones in southwest Bulgaria, in Vozar, J. (ed.), Magmatism of the molasse-forming epoch and its relation to endogenous mineralizaton: Bratislava, Geologicky ustav Dioyza Stura 9–34.Google Scholar
  12. Ivanov, Z., l988, Apercu general sur l’evolution geologique et structurale du massif des Rhodopes dans la cadre des Balkindes: Bulletin De la Société Géologique De France, 8, IV, 2, 227–240.Google Scholar
  13. Kotzev, V., Nakov, R., Burchfiel, B. C., King. R., Reilinger, R., 2001, GPS study of active tectonics in Bulgaria: results from l996 to l998: Journal Geodynamics 31, 2, 189–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kotzev, V., Nakov., R., Georgiev, Tz., Burchfiel B. C., King, R. W., 2006, Crustal motion and strain accumulation in western Bulgaria, Tectonophysics 413, 127–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kounov, A., Seward. D., Bernouli, D., Burg, J.-P., Ivanov, Z., 2004 Thermotectonic evolution of an extensional dome: the Cenozoic Osogovo-Lisets core complex (Kriashte zone, western Bulgaria): International Journal of Earth Science, 93, 1008–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Krohe, A., Mposkos, E., 2002, Multiple generations of extensional detachments in the Rhodope Mountains (northern Greece): Evidence of episodic exhumation of high-pressure rocks: in Blondell, D. J., Neubauer, F., von Quadt, A. (eds.), The timing and location of major ore deposits in and evolving orogen: Geological Society London Special Publication 204, 151–178.Google Scholar
  17. Lister, G., Davis, G. A., l989, The origin of metamorphic core complexes and detachment faults formed during Tertiary continental extension in the northern Colorado River region, USA: Journal of Structural Geology, 11, 1/2, 65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nakov, R. Kotzev, V., Burchfiel. B. C., King, R. W., 2001a, GPS data on the active tectonics of the Bulgarian Rhodopes: Geologica Balkanica, 31, 1–2, 123–125.Google Scholar
  19. Nakov, R., Burchfiel, B. C., Tzankov, T., Royden, L. H., 2001b, Late Miocene to recent sedimentary basins of Bulgaria: Geological Society of America Map Chart Series MCH 088, scale 1/200.000, 28 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Perincek, D., l991, Possible strand of the North Anatolian Fault in the Thrace Basin, Turkey–an interpretation: Bulletin, American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 75, 241–257.Google Scholar
  21. Schermer, E. R., 1990, Mechanisms of blueschist creation and preservation in an A-type subduction zone, Mount Olympus region, Greece: Geology 18, 1130–1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schermer, E. R., l993, Geometry and kinematics of continental basement deformation during the Alpine orogeny, Mount Olympus region, Greece: Journal of Structural Geology, 15, 571–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sengor, A. M. C., Yilmaz, Y., 1981, Tethyan evolution of Turkey: A plate tectonic approach: Tectonophysics, 75, 181–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sengor , A. M. C., Tuysuz, O., Imren, C., Sakinc, M., Ekyidogan, H., Gorur, N., Le Pichon, X., Rangin, C., 2004, The North Anatolian Fault: A New Look: Annual Reviews of Earth and Planetary Sciences: 32, 1–75. C.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tzankov, T., Angelova, D., Nakov., R., Burchfiel, B. C., Royden, L. H., l996, The Sub-Balkan graben system of central Bulgaria: Basin Research, 8, 125–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zagorchev, I., 1992, Neotectonic development of the Struma (Kraistid) lineament, southwest Bulgaria and northern Greece: Geological Magazine, 129, 197–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zagorchev, I., 1998, Pre-Priabonian Paleogene formations in southwestern Bulgaria and northern Greece: Stratigraphy and tectonic implications: Geological Magazine, 135, 101–119, doi: 10.1017/S0016756897008285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Clark Burchfiel
    • 1
  • Robert W. King
    • 1
  • Radoslav Nakov
    • 2
  • Tzanko Tzankov
    • 3
  • Nikola Dumurdzanov
    • 3
  • Todor Serafi movski
    • 4
  • Angel Todosov
    • 5
  • Bilbil Nurce
    • 6
  1. 1.Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.Institute of GeologyBulgarian Academy of SciencesBulgaria
  3. 3.Southwest UniversityBulgaria
  4. 4.Faculty of Mining and Geology StipUniversity of “St. Cyril and Methodius” SkopjeMacedonia
  5. 5.State Authority for Geodetic WorksMacedonia
  6. 6.Polytechnic University of TiranaAlbania

Personalised recommendations