Skip to main content

Aquaculture in the Coastal Zone: Pressures, Interactions and Externalities

  • Chapter
Aquaculture in the Ecosystem

This chapter focusses on the way aquaculture interacts with other users of the coastal zone, and specifically the side effects (externalities) of these interactions. The DPSIR (Driving forces — Pressure — State — Impact — Response) paradigm is used here to explore the externalities problem and to suggest policy solutions. Two aspects of the problem are considered, on the one hand those externalities generated by coastal zone activities that affect aquaculture, and on the other those originating from aquaculture itself. Monetary valuation is one way to assess externalities, and an example is provided for shrimp farming in mangroves (see appendix). The benefits and risks of different strategies for policy solutions based on assessments of externalities are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson JL (1985) Market interactions between aquaculture and the common-property commercial fishery. Marine Resource Economics 2:1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson DM, Hoagland P, Kaoru Y, White AW (2000) Estimated annual economic impacts from harmful algal blooms (HABs) in the United States. Woods Hole Technical Report WHOI-2000–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon (2003) Conserving Florida’s seagrass resources: developing a coordinated statewide program. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Florida Marine Research Institute, St Petersburg FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon (2004) Lønsedsundersøkjing for Matfiskanlegg (Survey of Profitabililty of Fish Farms). Norwegian Directorate of Fisheries.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asche F, Tveteras S (2004) On the relationship between aquaculture and reduction fisheries. J Agricultural Economics 55:245–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asche F, Guttormsen AG, Tveteras R (1999) Environmental problems, productivity and innovations in Norwegian salmon aquaculture. Aquaculture Economics and Management 3:19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailly D, Paquotte P (1996) Aquaculture and environment interactions in the perspective of renewable resource management theory. Coastal Management 24:251–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbier EB, Strand I (1998) Valuing mangrove-fishery linkages. A case study of Campeche, Mexico. Environmental and Resource Economics 12:151–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbier EB, Cox M (2004) An economic analysis of shrimp farm expansion and mangrove conversion in Thailand. Land Economics 80:389–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjorndal T (2002) The competitiveness of the Chilean salmon aquaculture industry. Aquaculture Economics and Management 6(1/2):97–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black E, Gowen R, Rosenthal H, Roth E, Stechy D, Taylor F (1997) The costs of eutrophication from salmon farming: implications for policy – a comment. Journal of Environmental Management 50:105–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen RE, Riley C (2003) Socio-economic indicators and integrated coastal management. Ocean and Coastal Management 46:299–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burbridge P, Hendrick V, Roth E, Rosenthal H (2001) Social and economic policy issues relevant to marine aquaculture. Journal of Applied Icthyology 17:194–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caffey RH, Kaxmierczak RF, Avault JW (2001) Developing consensus indicators of sustainability for southeastern United States aquaculture. LSU AgCenter No. 879, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, D’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naem S, O’Neill V, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, Van Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes TF, Miller KL, Read PA (2000) Monitoring and regulation of marine aquaculture in Europe. Journal of Applied Icthyology 16:138–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Kautsky N, Troell M (1994) The costs of eutrophication from salmon farming: implications for policy. Journal of Environmental Management 40:173–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia SM, Staples DJ, Chesson J (2000) The FAO guidelines and use of indicators for sustainable development of marine capture fisheries and an Australian example of their application. Ocean and Coastal Management 43:537–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garza-Gil MD, Suris-Regueiro JC, Varela-Lafuente MM (2006) Assessment of economic damages from the Prestige oil spill. Marine Policy 30:544–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gren I-M (2000) Winners and losers from Baltic Sea nitrogen reductions. In: Gren I-G, Turner K, Wulff F (eds) Managing a sea: the ecological economics of the Baltic. Earthscan Publications, London, UK, pp 95–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grieve C, Sporrong N, Coffey C, Moretti S, Martini N (2003) Review and gap analysis of environmental indicators for fisheries and aquaculture. Institute for European Environmental Policy, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigalunas TA, Anderson RC, Brown GM Jr, Congar R, Meade NF, Sorensen PE (1986) Estimating the cost of oil spills: lessons from the Amoco Cadiz incident. Marine Resource Economics 2:239–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannesson R (2003) Aquaculture and fisheries. Marine Policy 27:169–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmer M, Perez M, Duarte CM (2003) Benthic primary producers – a neglected environmental problem in Mediterranean maricultures? Marine Pollution Bulletin 46:1372–1376.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huang C-H (1990) Economic valuation of underground water and man-induced land subsidence in aquaculture. Applied Economics 22:31–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katranidis S, Nitsi E, Vakrou A (2003) Social acceptability of aquaculture development in coastal areas: the case of two Greek Islands. Coastal Management 31:37–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledoux L, Turner RK (2002) Valuing ocean and coastal resources: a review of practical examples and issues for further action. Ocean and Coastal Management 45:583–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu WH, Ou CH, Ting KH (2005) Sustainable coastal fishery development indicator system: a case of Gungliau, Taiwan. Marine Policy 29:199–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machias A, Karakassis I, Labropoulou M, Somarakis S, Papadopoulou KN, Papaconstantinou C (2004) Change in wild fish assemblages after the establishment of a fish farming zone in an oligotrophic marine ecosystem. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 60:771–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muir J (2005) Managing to harvest? Perspectives on the potential of aquaculture. Phil. Trans. Royal Society B. 360:191–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muir J, Bruger C, Young J, Stewart J (1999) The solution to pollution? The value and limitations of environmental economics in guiding aquaculture development. Aquaculture Economics and Management 3:43–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • PACEC and Stirling Aquaculture (1999) The Economic Impact of Scottish Salmon Farming. Report for HIE and SOAEFD. Economic Research Paper No. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce DW, Secombe-Hett T (2000) Economic valuation and environmental decision-making in Europe. Environmental Science and Technology 34:1419–1425.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perman R, Ma Y, McGilvray J, Common M (2003) Natural Resource and Environmental Economics. Longman, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pongthanapanich T, Roth E (2006) Toward Environmental Responsibility of Thai Shrimp Farming through a Voluntary Management Scheme. IME Working Paper 70/06, Department of Environmental and Business Economics, University of Southern Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read P, Fernandes T (2003) Management of environmental impacts of marine aquaculture in Europe. Aquaculture 226:139–163.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Santillo D, Johnston P, Langston WJ (2001) Tributyltin (TBT) antifoulants: a tale of ships, snails and imposex. In: Harremoës P, Gee D, MacGarvin M, Stirling A, Keys J, Wynne B, Vaz SG (eds) Late Lessons from Early Warnings: The Precautionary Principle 1896–2000, European Environment Agency Environmental Issue Report No 22, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, ISBN 92–9167-323–4, 2001, pp 135–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sathirathai S (1998) Economic valuation of mangroves and the roles of local communities in the conservation of resources: case study of Surat Thani, South of Thailand. Final Report Submitted to the Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia (EEP-SEA), Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sathirathai S, Barbier EB (2001) Valuing mangrove conservation in Southern Thailand. Contemporary Economic Policy 19:109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scottish Parliament Information Centre (1999) Salmon farming and the impact of the ISA virus. Research Note 99/20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secretan PAD, Nash T (1989) Aquaculture and Risk Management. ADCP/REP/89/41. FAO, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley D (2000) The economics of the adoption of BMPs: the case of mariculture water management. Ecological Economics 35:145–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tran Thanh Be, Le Canh Dung, Brenan D (1999) Environmental costs of shrimp farming in the rice-growing regions of the Mekong Delta. Aquaculture Economics and Management 3:31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tveteras S (2002) Norwegian salmon aquaculture and sustainability: the relationship between environmental quality and industry growth. Marine Resource Economics 17:121–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Anrooy R, Secretan PAD, Lou Y, Roberts R, Upare M (2006) Review of the current state of world aquaculture insurance. FAO Technical paper 493. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitmarsh D, Wattage P (2006) Public attitudes towards the environmental impact of salmon aquaculture in Scotland. European Environment 16(2):108–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye Y, Beddington JR (1996) Bioeconomic interactions between the capture fishery and aquaculture. Marine Resource Economics 11:105–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Younger A, Kershaw S (2004) Sewage discharge improvements in the Solent and their effect on the shellfishery. CEFAS Shellfish News No. 17 (May).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Whitmarsh, D., Palmieri, M.G. (2008). Aquaculture in the Coastal Zone: Pressures, Interactions and Externalities. In: Holmer, M., Black, K., Duarte, C.M., Marbà, N., Karakassis, I. (eds) Aquaculture in the Ecosystem. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6810-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics