The fatigue loads on a structure in service are generally referred to as the load spectrum. The description of load spectra and methods to obtain load spectra are discussed in the present chapter. A survey of various aspects of fatigue of structures was presented as a flow diagram in introductory chapter (Chapter 1, Figure 1.2). A reduced diagram is presented here in Figure 9.1 to illustrate the significance of load spectra for fatigue design analysis of a structure. Without information on the anticipated load spectrum, the analysis of the fatigue performance of a structure is impossible. Furthermore, verification tests to support the analysis are often necessary for economic or safety reasons. The load spectrum must be consulted for planning such validation tests.

Sometimes the load spectrum is changed after a number of years by a modified use of the structure, which is different from the initial expectations. The load spectrum must then be considered again. Fatigue load spectra should also be reviewed if fatigue failures occur in service.

Keywords

Fatigue Transportation Drilling Eisen Aircrafts 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Private information Mr. van Maarschalkerwaart, Dutch Railways.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schijve, J. The analysis of random load-time histories with relation to fatigue tests and life calculations. Fatigue of Aircraft Structures, 2nd ICAF Symposium, W. Barrois and E.L. Ripley (Eds.). Pergamon Press (1963) pp. 115–149.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Haibach, E., Fischer, R., Schütz, W. and Hück, M., A standard random load sequence of Gaussian type recommended for general application in fatigue testing; its mathematical background and digital generation. In: Fatigue Testing and Design. Vol. 2, Soc., Environmental Engineers, London (1976), pp. 29.1–29.21.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schütz, W., Standardized stress-time histories: An overview. Development of Fatigue Load Spectra, STP 1006, ASTM (1989), pp. 3–16.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Matsuishi, M. and Endo, T., Fatigue of metals subjected to varying stress — Fatigue lives under random loading. Preliminary Proc. of the Kyushu District Meeting, The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers (1968), pp. 37–40 [in Japanese].Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burns, A., Fatigue loadings in flight: Loads in the tailplane and fin of a Varsity. A.R.C. Technical Report C.P.256. London (1956).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dowling, N.E., Mechanical Behavior of Materials. Engineering Methods for Deformation, Fracture, and Fatigue, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall (2006).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hillbery, B.M., Fatigue life of 2024-T3 aluminum alloy under narrow- and broad-band random loading. ASTM STP 462 (1970), pp. 167–183.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rice, S.O., Mathematical analysis of random noise. Bell System Tech. Journal, Vols. 23 and 24, (1944 and 1945).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Buxbaum, O., Random load analysis as a link between operational stress measurement and fatigue life assessment. ASTM STP 671 (1979), pp. 5–20.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Griese, F.W., Schöne, G., Schütz, W. and Hück, M., Crack growth in torsion loaded axles of rolling machines during production. Stahl und Eisen, Vol. 99 (1979), pp. 193–198 [in German].Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Weiss, M.P., Simulation and monitoring of loads in crane beams. ASTM STP 671 (1979), pp. 208–221.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yamada, K. and Miki, C., Recent research on fatigue of bridge structures in Japan. J. Construst. Steel Res., Vol. 13 (1989), pp. 211–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schijve, J., Jacobs, F.A. and Tromp, P.J., Fatigue crack growth in aluminium alloy sheet material under flight-simulation loading. Effect of design stress level and loading frequency. Nat. Aerospace Lab. NLR, TR 72018, Amsterdam (1972).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    de Jonge, J.B., Schütz, D., Lowak, H. and Schijve, J., A standardized load sequence for flight simulation tests on transport aircraft wing structures. Nat. Aerospace Lab. NLR, TR 72018, Amsterdam (1973). Also: Laboratorium für Betriebsfestigkeit LBF, Bericht FB-106 (1973).Google Scholar

Some general references

  1. 16.
    Murakami, Y., Mineki. K., Wakamatsu, T. and Morita, T., Data acquisition by a small portable strain histogram recorder (Mini-Rainflow Corder) and application to fatigue design of car wheels. Fatigue Design 1998, ESIS Publication 23, Elsevier (1999), pp. 373–383.Google Scholar
  2. 17.
    Heuler, P. and Schütz, W., Standardized load-time histories — Status and trends. In: Low Cycle Fatigue and Elasto-Plastic Behaviour of Materials. Elsevier (1998), pp. 729–734.Google Scholar
  3. 18.
    Rice, C.R. (Ed.), SAE Fatigue Design Handbook, 3rd edn. AE-22, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale (1997).Google Scholar
  4. 19.
    Murakami, Y. (Ed.), The Rainflow Method in Fatigue. The Tatsuo Endo Memorial Volume. Butterworth Heinemann (1992).Google Scholar
  5. 20.
    Potter, J.M. and Watanabe, R.T. (Eds.), Development of Fatigue Loading Spectra. ASTM STP 1006 (1989).Google Scholar
  6. 21.
    Buxbaum, O., Fatigue Strength in Service. Verlag Stahleisen mbH, Düsseldorf (1986) [in German].Google Scholar
  7. 22.
    Standard Practices for Cycle Counting in Fatigue Analysis. ASTM Standard E 1049-85 (1985).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Personalised recommendations