Constructing Climate Quality Atmospheric Temperatures from Satellite Microwave Measurements

  • C. A. Mears
Part of the Advances in Global Change Research book series (AGLO, volume 33)


Satellite-borne microwave sounding instruments have been making measurements of the temperature of the Earth’s atmosphere for several decades. In order to construct a single atmospheric temperature data set from these measurements, data from a number of satellites must be combined, since each satellite operated only during a small part of the longer time period. If the combined data set is to be of sufficient quality to evaluate changes on the decadal or longer time scales, a number of calibration issues and time-varying biases must be addressed, and their effects removed from the data to the extent possible. Other sources of atmospheric temperature data, such as in situ measurements made by radiosondes and the output of the various reanalysis efforts, have not been demonstrated to be of high-enough quality to validate the satellite data. Because of this, satellite data is typically intercalibrated using a detailed analysis of data from periods of simultaneous operation by two or more satellites. When this type of calibration is used, long periods of simultaneous observation are needed to reduce uncertainties in the calibration procedure.


Tropospheric Temperature Microwave Sounding Unit Remote Sensing System Internal Uncertainty Climate Change Science Program 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Christy, J. R., R. W. Spencer, and W. D. Braswell, 2000: MSU tropospheric temperatures: dataset construction and radiosonde comparisons. J. Atmos. Ocean Tech., 17, 1153–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Christy, J. R., R. W. Spencer, W. B. Norris, W. D. Braswell, and D. E. Parker, 2003: Error estimates of version 5.0 of MSU-AMSU bulk atmospheric temperatures. J. Atmos. Ocean Tech., 20, 613–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fu, Q. and C. M. Johanson 2005: Satellite-derived vertical dependence of tropospheric temperature trends. Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L10703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fu, Q., C. M. Johanson, S. G. Warren, and D. J. Seidel, 2004: Contribution of stratospheric cooling to satellite-inferred tropospheric temperature trends. Nature, 429, 55–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Grody, N. C., K. Y. Vinnikov, M. D. Goldberg, J. T. Sullivan, and J. D. Tarpley, 2004: Calibration of multi-satellite observations for climatic studies: Microwave Sounding Unit (MSU). J. Geophys. Res., 109, D24104, doi:10.1029/2004JD005079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lanzante, J., S. Klein, and D. Seidel2003: Temporal homogenization of monthly radiosonde temperature data. Part I: methodology. J. Climate, 16, 224–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lanzante, J. R., T. C. Peterson, F. J. Wentz, and K. Y. Vinnikov, 2006: What do observations indicate about the change in temperatures in the atmosphere and at the surface since the advent of measuring temperatures vertically. In: Temperature Trends in the Lower Atmosphere: Steps for Understanding and Reconciling Differences, T. R. Karl, S. J. Hassol, C. D. Miller, and W. L. Murray, eds., A Report by the Climate Change Science Program and the Subcommittee on Global Change Research, Washington, DC, 47–70.Google Scholar
  8. Mears, C. A., M. Schabel, F. J. Wentz, B. D. Santer, and B. Govindasamy, 2002: Correcting the MSU middle tropospheric temperature for diurnal drifts. Proceedings of the International Geophysics and Remote Sensing Symposium III, 1839–1841.Google Scholar
  9. Mears, C. A., M. C. Schabel, and F. J. Wentz, 2003: A reanalysis of the MSU channel 2 tropospheric temperature record. J. Climate, 16, 3650–3664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mears, C. A., C. E. Forest, R. W. Spencer, R. S. Vose, and R. W. Reynolds, 2006: What is our understanding of the contribution made by observational or methodological uncertainties to the previously reported vertical differences in temperature trends. In: Temperature Trends in the Lower Atmosphere: Steps for Understanding and Reconciling Differences. T. R. Karl, S. J. Hassol, C. D. Miller, and W. L. Murray, eds., A Report by the Climate Change Science Program and the Subcommittee on Global Change Research, Washington, DC, 71–88.Google Scholar
  11. Spencer, R. W. and J. R. Christy, 1992: Precision and radiosonde validation of satellite gridpoint temperature anomalies. Part II: a tropospheric retrieval and trends during 1979–1990. J. Climate, 5, 858–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Thorne, P. W., D. E. Parker, J. R. Christy, and C. A. Mears, 2005: Causes of differences in observed climate trends. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 86, 1437–1442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Thorne, P. W., D. E. Parker, S. F. B. Tett, P. D. Jones, M. McCarthy, H. Coleman, and P. Brohan, 2005: Revisiting radiosonde upper-air temperatures from 1958 to 2002. J. Geophys. Res., 110, D18105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Vinnikov, K. Y., N. C. Grody, A. Robock, R. J. Stouffer, P. D. Jones, and M. D. Goldberg, 2005: Temperature trends at the surface and in the troposphere. J. Geophys. Res., 111, D03106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wentz, F. J. and M. Schabel, 1998: Effects of satellite orbital decay on MSU lower tropospheric temperature trends. Nature, 394, 661–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. A. Mears
    • 1
  1. 1.Remote Sensing SystemsSanta RosaUSA

Personalised recommendations