Disability: Suffering, Social Oppression, or Complex Predicament?

  • Tom Shakespeare
Part of the International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine book series (LIME, volume 39)


Social Exclusion Disable People Social Model Disability Policy Disability Study 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abberley, P. “Work, disability and European social theory”. In Disability Studies Today. C. Barnes, M. Oliver and L. Barton (eds.). Cambridge: Polity,2001.Google Scholar
  2. Albrecht, G.L. and Devlieger P.J. “The disability paradox: high quality of life against all odds”. Social Science and Medicine, 48, 977–988,1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnes, C. “The social model of disability: a sociological phenomenon ignored by sociologists”. In The Disability Reader. T. Shakespeare (ed.). London: Cassell,1998.Google Scholar
  4. Bauman, Z. Postmodern Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell, 1993.Google Scholar
  5. Beresford, P. and Wallcraft, J. “Psychiatric system survivors and emancipatory research: issues, overlaps and differences”. In Doing Disability Research. C. Barnes and G. Mercer (eds.). Leeds: The Disability Press,1997.Google Scholar
  6. Bickenbach, J.E., Chatterji, S., Badley, E.M. and Ustun, T.B. “Models of disablement, universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps”. Social Science and Medicine, 48, 1173–1187,1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. British Council of Disabled People (n.d.). “The social model of disability and emancipatory disability research”– briefing document, downloaded from Last visit: 23 March2004.Google Scholar
  8. Campbell, J. and Oliver, M. Disability Politics: Understanding Our Past, Changing Our Future. London: Routledge,1996.Google Scholar
  9. Charlton, J. Nothing About Us Without Us: Disability, Oppression and Empowerment. Berkeley: University of California Press,1998.Google Scholar
  10. Crow, L. “Including all our lives”. In Encounters with Strangers: Feminism and Disability. J.Morris (ed.). London: Women’s Press,1996.Google Scholar
  11. Danermark, B. and Gellerstedt, L.C. “Social justice: redistribution and recognition– a non-reductionist perspective on disability”. Disability and Society, 19, 4, 339–353,2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dreidger, D. The Last Civil Rights Movement. London: Hurst, 1989.Google Scholar
  13. French, S. “Disability, impairment or something in between”. In Disabling Barriers, Enabling Environments. J. Swain etal. (eds.). London: Sage, 17–25,1993.Google Scholar
  14. Gabel, S. and Peters, S. “Presage of a paradigm shift? Beyond the social model of disability toward resistance theories of disability”. Disability and Society, 19, 6, 585–600,2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goodley, D. “‘Learning difficulties’, the social model of disability and impairment: challenging epistemologies”. Disability and Society, 16, 2, 207–231,2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gordon, B.O. and Rosenblum, K.E. “Bringing disability into the sociological frame: a comparison of disability with race, sex and sexual orientation statuses”. Disability and Society, 16, 1,5–19,2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gustavsson, A. “The role of theory in disability research: springboard or strait-jacket”. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 6, 1, 55–70,2004.Google Scholar
  18. Hahn, H. “Towards a politics of disability: definitions, disciplines and policies”. Social Science Journal, 22, 4, 87–105,1985.Google Scholar
  19. Harris, J. “Is gene therapy a form of eugenics?” Bioethics, 7, 178–87,1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harris, J. “One principle and three fallacies of disability studies”. Journal of Medical Ethics, 27, 6, 383–388,2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hunt, P. (ed.). Stigma. London: Geoffrey Chapman Publishing, 1966.Google Scholar
  22. Hurst, R. “To revise or not to revise”. Disability and Society, 15, 7, 1083–1087,2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leroi, A.M. Mutants: On the Form, Varieties and Errors of the Human Body. London: Harper Perennial,2005.Google Scholar
  24. Macintyre, A. Dependent Rational Animals: Why Human Beings Need the Virtues. London: Duckworth,1999.Google Scholar
  25. Morris, J. Pride Against Prejudice. London: Women’s Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  26. Oakley, A. Sex, Gender and Society. London: Gower, 1972.Google Scholar
  27. Oliver, M. Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1996.Google Scholar
  28. Oliver, M. “The social model in action: if I had a hammer”. In Implementing the Social Model of Disability: Theory and Research. C. Barnes and G. Mercer (eds.). Leeds: The Disability Press, 18–47,2004.Google Scholar
  29. Oliver, M. and Sapey, B. Social Work with Disabled People. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan,1998.Google Scholar
  30. Shakespeare, T. Disability Rights and Wrongs. London: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar
  31. Stiker, H.-J. A History of Disability. University of Michigan Press,2000.Google Scholar
  32. Sutherland, A. Disabled We Stand. London: Souvenir Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  33. Thomas, C. Female Forms: Experiencing and Understanding Disability. Buckingham: Open University Press,1999.Google Scholar
  34. Timpanaro, S. On Materialism. London: New Left Books, 1975.Google Scholar
  35. Tøssebro, J. “Understanding disability”. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 6, 1,3–7,2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. UPIAS. Fundamental Principles of Disability. London: UPIAS, 1976.Google Scholar
  37. Van den Ven, L., Post, M., de Witte, L. and Van den Heuvel, W. “It takes two to tango: the integration of people with disabilities into society”. Disability and Society, 20, 3,311–329,2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Williams, S.J. “Is anybody there? Critical realism, chronic illness and the disability debate”. Sociology of Health and Illness, 21, 6, 797–819,1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zola, I.K. “Towards the necessary universalizing of a disability policy”. The Milbank Quarterly, 67, Suppl. 2, Pt. 2, 401–428,1989CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tom Shakespeare

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations