Advertisement

Methods of Chronobiometric Analysis of Mitochondrial Function

  • Miroslav Mikulecký

The methodical hints are given on the basis of the inferential Halberg’s cosinor regression for obtaining the optimal information from experimental data organized in the frame of the Halberg’s circa(semi)dian design. First, the population of experimental animals has to be defined exactly to secure its homogeneity. Second, a random choice of separate animals must be kept. Third, optimal sampling times have to be settled and realized. Fourth, it is recommended to transform the measured data into the Mesor RelatedValues (MRV), to be able to compare mutually the results from various variables. Fifth, the best way of expressing the results for consecutive medical considerations and decisions is a graph of the approximating function, including confidence and tolerance corridors. Critically is mentioned the common practice to use standard errors or deviations (representing only 50–68% confidence or tolerance) and p-value, falsely overestimating the impression of an effect. Sixth, the same principles should be applied to differences between measurements – a relatively new idea. The evaluation of global effect can be misleading. These modes of presentation are illustrated on coenzymes Q9 and Q10, as well as on the oxidative phosphorylation cascade for Complex I using data from control and diabetic rats.

Keywords

Coenzyme Q Halberg’s circadians Halberg’s cosinor mitochondria myocardium phosphorylation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    D’Agostino RB (1971) An omnibus test of normality for moderate and large size samples. Biometrika 58:341–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bingham Ch, Arbogast B, Cornélissen GG, Lee JK, Halberg F (1982) Inferential statistical methods for estimating and comparing cosinor parameters. Chronobiologia 9:397–439PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Diem K, Seldrup J (1982) Geigy scientific tables, Vol. 2. In: Lentner C (ed.) Introduction to Statistics. Statistical Tables. Mathematical Formulae, 8th edn. Ciba Geigy, Basle, 240 ppGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Evans SJW, Mills P, Dawson J (1988) The end of the P value? Br Heart J 60:177–180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fedor-Freybergh PG, Mikulecký M (2005) From the descriptive towards inferential statistics. Hundred years since conception of the Student’s t-distribution. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 26:167–171PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gardner MJ, Altman DG (1986) Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing. Br Med J 292:746–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goodman SN (1992) A comment on replication, P-values and evidence. Stat Med 11:875–879PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    de Groot MH (1987) A conversion with CR Rao. Stat Sci 1:53–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gvozdjáková A, Kucharská J, Cornélissen G, Mikulecký M, Singh RB, Halberg F (2004) Variation in cardiac mitochondrial coenzyme Q10 and oxidative phosphorylation. Int J Cardiol 97(2):S15. Third International Congress on Cardiovascular Disease, Taipei, Taiwan, 26–28 November 2004Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gvozdjáková A, Kucharská J, Cornélissen G, Mikulecký M, Singh RB, Halberg F (2005a) Circadian and semicircadian variations of heart mitochondrial coenzyme Q in relationship to oxidative phosphorylation. Fourth Conference of the International Coenzyme Q 10 Association, Los Angeles, USA, 14–17 April 2005, Abstract Book, pp 113–115Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gvozdjáková A, Kucharská J, Cornélissen G, Mikulecký M, Singh RB, Halberg F (2005b) Heart mitochondrial coenzyme “Q10-chronome” and variations of oxidative phosphorylation in diabetic rats. Mitochondrion 5:15–16. Mitochondrial Medicine 2005 Meeting, St. Louis, USA, 15–18 June 2005Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kubáček L, Valach A, Mikulecký M (1989) Time series analysis with periodic components. Software manual.Bratislava: ComTel Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mikulecký M (2004) Confidence and tolerance intervals–a tool for biomedical data analysis aimed at clear evidence. Cardiology 13:211–215Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rothman KJ, Greenland S (1998) Modern Epidemiology, 2nd edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp737Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miroslav Mikulecký
    • 1
  1. 1.First Medical ClinicComenius UniversitySlovakia

Personalised recommendations