What Can Argumentation Tell Us About Epistemology?
Who, besides scientists, engages in what we would call scientific argumentation? When? for what purpose? As calls for argumentation to take a central place in science instruction increase (Driver et al., 2000; Duschl & Osborne, 2002; Kuhn, 1993b), answers to these questions become more important. There are two key claims for engaging students in scientific argumentation. One is that argumentation is a central practice of science, and thus should be at the core of science education. The other is that understanding the norms of scientific argumentation can lead students to understand the epistemological bases of scientific practice. We are more interested in this second claim. We think it unlikely that people who do not practice science are likely to engage in truly scientific argumentation. At the same time, we see everyday contexts all around us where people might apply scientific arguments to further other kinds of arguments. For example, using arguments about global climate change to argue for or against particular energy policies or even personal consumer decisions.
KeywordsScience Class Scientific Argumentation Epistemological Belief Scientific Claim Personal Epistemology
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). The development of conceptions of the nature of scientific knowledge and knowing in the middle and high school years: A cross-sectional study, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
- Bell, P., & Linn, M. C. (2002). Beliefs about science: How does science instruction contribute? In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 321–346). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Griffis, K., & Wise, J. (2005). Sensing the environment. Los Angeles, CA: Center for Embedded Networked Sensing, University of California.Google Scholar
- Hammer, D., & Elby, A. (2002). On the form of a personal epistemology. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 169–190). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Kelly, G. J., & Duschl, R. A. (2002). Toward a research agenda for epistemological studies in science education, Paper presented at the annual meeting of NARST 2002. New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
- Kitcher, P. (1991). Persuasion. In M. Pera & W. R. Shea (Eds.), Persuading science: The art of scientific rhetoric (pp. 3–27). Canton, MA: Science History Publications.Google Scholar
- Kuhn, D. (1993a). Connecting scientific and informal reasoning. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 39(1), 74–103.Google Scholar
- Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2006). Scientific thinking and science literacy. In W. Damon, R. Lerner, K. A. Renninger, & I. E. Sigel (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, 6th ed., Vol. 4: Child psychology in practice. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar