Resource Pricing and Poverty Alleviation: The Case of Block Tariffs for Water in Beijing

  • Ben Groom
  • Xiaoying Liu
  • Tim Swanson
  • Shiqiu Zhang
Part of the Environment & Policy book series (ENPO, volume 48)

In recent years the arid North East of China, and in particular Beijing, has suffered sporadic shortages of water. The causes of these events are manifold and like most manifestations of scarcity, water scarcity has important demand and supply side elements. Although on the supply side drought events have contributed to water shortages in the past few years, it is the nature of water demand that presents perhaps the most important determinant of water scarcity in Beijing. On the one hand, as a downstream user, surface water supplies to Beijing have been reduced by increased demands, largely from agriculture, in upstream areas of the Chao River (Hou, 2001). On the other hand, unprecedented economic growth and rural-to-urban migration in China as a whole means that urban water demand has increased both as the populous increases and as households become wealthier.


Water Demand Poverty Alleviation Demand Response Water Price Income Quintile 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Banks, J., Blundell, R., and Weber. (1997). A quadratic almost ideal demand system. Econometrica.Google Scholar
  2. Billings, R. B., and Agthe, D. E. (1980). Price elasticities for water: a case of increasing block rates. Land Economics, 56(1): 73–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Billings, R. (1982). Specification of block rate price variable in demand models. Land Economics, 58(3): 386–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cavanagh, S.M., Hanemann, W.M., and Stavins, R.N. (2001). Muffled price signals: household water demand under increasing-block prices. FEEM Working Paper No. 40.2002.Google Scholar
  5. CIDA Funded Project Team (1999). Report on urban household water use pilot survey in Beijing and Tianjin, Sustainable Water Resources Management in Beijing and Tianjin Region Water Demand Estimation. The centre for human settlements, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
  6. CCICED (2002). Implementing the Natural Forest Protection Programme and the Sloping Land Conversion Program: Lessons and Policy Recommendations. CCICED taskforce on forests and grasslands. China Forestry Publishing House.Google Scholar
  7. Dalhuisen, J.M., Florax, R.J.G.M., Groot, H.L.F., and Nijkamp, P. (2001). Price and income elasticities of residential water demand. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper. TI 2001–057/3.Google Scholar
  8. Deaton, A. and Muellbauer. (1980). An almost ideal demand system. Econometrica.Google Scholar
  9. Economy, E. (1997). Environmental Scarcities, State Capacity, and Civil Violence: The Case of China. (Part of the State Capacity project of the Toronto group, Homer-Dixon et al.).Google Scholar
  10. Espey, M., Espey, J., and Shaw, W.D. (1997). Price elasticity of residential demand for water: a meta-analysis. Water Resources Research 33(6): 1369–1374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gibson, J., Huang, J., and Rozelle S. (2003). Improving estimates of Inequality and poverty from urban China’s household income and expenditure survey. Review of Income and Wealth. 49(1): 53–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Herrington, P. (1995). Pricing water properly, en O’Riordan, T. Ecotaxation, 263: 286. Earthscan, London.Google Scholar
  13. Höglund, L. (1999). Household demand for water in Sweden with implications of a potential tax on water use. Water Resources Research, 35(12): 3853–3863, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hou, E. (2001). Nine Dragons, One River: The Role of Institutions in Developing Water Pricing Policy in Beijing, PRC. Full text documents. 3x3 Beijing Tianjin Water Resources Management Project, The centre for human settlements, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
  15. Hou, E., and Hunter, G. (1998). Beijing Water: Causes, Effects, Solutions. Full text documents. 3x3 Beijing Tianjin Water Resources Management Project. The centre for human settlements, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
  16. Hsiao, C. (2003). Analysis of Panel Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Koundouri, P., Pashardes, P., and Hadjispirou, S. (2002). Equity and efficiency in water pricing: the case of Cyprus. Environment and Development Economics.Google Scholar
  18. Lu Xiao-yan, Xu Fu-Liu, Shu Tao, Dawson, R. W., Gang Li Ben, Cao Jun, Leaf, M., and Hou Eve (2000). Current situation, defects and future suggestions of institutional framework for water resources management in China. Peking University Working paper.Google Scholar
  19. Martínez-Espiñeira, R. (2002). Estimating Water Demand under Increasing Block tariffs Using Aggregate Data and Proportions of Users per Block. Environmental and Resource Economics, 26: 5–23, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Moffitt, R. (1986). The econometrics of piecewise-linear budget constraints: A survey and exposition of the Maximum Likelihood Method. Journal of Business & Economics Statistics, July 1986, 4(3): 317–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nieswiadomy, M.L. and Molina, D.J. (1991). A note on price perception in water demand models. Land Economics 67(3): 352–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nordin, J. (1976). A proposed modification on Taylor’s demand supply analysis: comment. Bell Journal of Economic Management and Science, 7(2): 719–721.Google Scholar
  23. OECD, (1999b). Household water pricing in OECD countries. OECD, Paris, unclassified document ENV/EPOC/GEEI(98) 12/FINAL.Google Scholar
  24. Planning Report (2001). Sustainable Utilization Planning of Capital Water Resource in the Early Stage of the 21st Century (2001–2005). Government of China.Google Scholar
  25. Seery, M. (1996). Distributional impact of water pricing. Equity and the Environment.Google Scholar
  26. Smith, S. and Rajah, N. (1993). Distributional aspects of household water charges. Fiscal Studies, 14(3): 86–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sterner, T. (2003). Policy Instruments for Environmental and Natural Resource Management. Resources for the Future. Washington DC.Google Scholar
  28. US Water News (2004). Water Hikes Expected in Beijing. US water News online, June. Article can be found at:.Google Scholar
  29. Whittington, D. and Boland, B. (2000). The political economy of Increasing block tariffs. Ch 10 in Dinar (2000) the political economy of water pricing.Google Scholar
  30. Whittington, D. (2002). Municipal Water Pricing and Tariff Design: A Reform Agenda for cities in Developing countries. Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
  31. World Bank (1997). Water pricing experiences: An international perspective.Google Scholar
  32. Xinhuanet (2004)., 2004–06–16.
  33. Yan P., and Stover, J. (1999). Water pricing issues and potential legal reforms in China. Sinosphere 2(4).Google Scholar
  34. Yatchew. (1998). Non and semi-parametric estimation techniques: A review. Journal of Economic Surveys.Google Scholar
  35. Yepes, G. (1999). Do Cross-subsidies help the poor to benefit from water and wastewater services Lessons from Guayaquil. World Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ben Groom
    • 1
  • Xiaoying Liu
    • 2
  • Tim Swanson
    • 3
  • Shiqiu Zhang
  1. 1.SOASyUniversity of LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsNormal UniversityBeijingChina
  3. 3.Department of Economics and School of Public PolicyUniversity of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations