Advertisement

Forestry and Rural Development: Global Trends and Applications to the Sino-Italian Context

  • Giuseppe Scarascia Mugnozza
  • Maria Emilia Malvolti

Abstract

International Agreements, as those on biodiversity, sustainable development and climate change, have recognized the role of forests at the global scale identifying also the risk of the impact of environmental changes on forests’ stability and functions. A sound management of natural and man-made forests and their extension can help counteracting the risks of global change. Humankind is increasingly challenging environmental degradation: deforestation, land degradation and erosion of biological diversity. Foresters are urgently required to improve productivity and sustainability of planted forests in an effort to preserve natural forests. In Europe as well as in other Countries, a large development of tree plantations is expected to occur mainly in the agricultural areas since planting trees will ensure a sustained, high productivity of woody biomass and interesting revenues to farmers. The role of forestry and agro-forestry is then discussed also in relation to the Sino-Italian scientific cooperation in this field.

Keywords

Soil Erosion Natural Forest Rural Development Tarim Basin Clean Development Mechanism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Del Galdo I., Six J., Peressotti A. and Cotrufo M.F., 2003. Assessing the impact of land-use change on soil C sequestration in agricultural soils by means of organic matter fractionation and stable C isotopes. Global Change Biology 9, pp. 1204-1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Del Lungo A., 2003. Planted forests in the world: an analysis of available data for silvicultural parameters and regional trend. Doctorate dissertation, University of Tuscia, Viterbo.Google Scholar
  3. FAO, 2001. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2000. Main Report. FAO, Forestry Paper 140.Google Scholar
  4. Guo L.B. and Gifford R.M., 2002. Soil carbon stocks and land use change: a meta analysis. Global Change Biology 8, pp. 345-360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. IGBP Terrestrial carbon working group, 1998. The terrestrial carbon cycle: implications for the Kyoto protocol. Science 280, pp. 1393-1394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. IPCC 2000, Watson R.T., Noble L.R., Bolin B., Ravindranath N.H., Verardo D.J. & Dokken D.J. (eds.), 2000. Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry. Report for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  7. Jarvis P.G., 1989. Atmospheric carbon dioxide and forest. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B324, pp. 369-392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Norby R.J., Wullschleger S.D., Gunderson C.A., Johnson D.W. and Ceulemans R., 1999. Tree responses to rising CO2 in field experiments: implications for the future forest. Plant Cell Environ 22, pp. 683-714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Post W.M. and Kwon K.C., 2000. Soil carbon sequestration and land-use change: processes and potential. Global Change Biology 6, pp. 317-327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Schlesinger W.H. and Lichter J., 2001. Limited carbon storage in soil and litter of experimental forest plots under increased atmospheric CO2. Nature 411, pp. 466-469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Smith P., Smith J.U., Powlson D., McGill W.B., Arah J.R.M., Chertov O.G., Coleman K., Franko R.G., Kilei-Gunnewiek H., Komarov A.S., Li C., Molina J.A.E., Mueller T., Parton W.J., Thornley J.H.M. and Whitmore A.P.P., 1997. A comparison of the performance of nine soil organic matter models using datasets from seven long-term experiments. Geoderma 81, pp. 153-225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Smith P., Powlson D.S., Smith J.U., Falloon P. and Coleman K., 2000. Meeting Europe’s climate change commitments: quantitative estimates of the potential for carbon mitigation by agriculture. Global Change Biology 6, pp. 525-539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Tabbush P.M. and Parfitt R., 1996. Poplar and willow clones for short rotation coppice. Research Information Note 278, Forestry Commission, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  14. Thornley J.H.M. and Cannell M.G.R., 2000. Managing forests for wood yield and carbon storage: a theoretical study. Tree Physiology 20, pp. 474-484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Vesterdal L., Ritter E. and Gundersen P., 2002. Change in soil organic carbon following afforestation of former arable land. For Ecol Manag 169, pp. 137-147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Zhaohua Z., Maoyi F. and Sastry C.B., 1997. Agroforestry in China - An overview. In: Overall study in agroforestry systems in China, International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giuseppe Scarascia Mugnozza
    • 1
  • Maria Emilia Malvolti
    • 2
  1. 1.University of TusciaTusciaItaly
  2. 2.IBAF-CNRTusciaItaly

Personalised recommendations