Unraveling Leadership: ‘Relational Humility’ and the Search for Ignorance

  • Vrinda Dalmiya
Part of the CERC Studies in Comparative Education book series (CERC, volume 20)

This chapter is concerned with a paradox, a promise and their contentious inter-relationship. The paradox is generated by the functioning of global capitalism. Even as fast flows of information, capital, goods, and people across national boundaries usher in an ‘epoch of borderlessness,’ various systems of exclusion that regulate differential access to wellbeing get solidified. Thus, the compression of geographical space is accompanied by a concurrent widening of economic distances between the rich and poor. The promise is that education can be a corrective to such imbalance. This anthology’s project is based in part on the belief that educational institutions can contribute to sustainable and equitable change and interdependence. The general hope is that self-critical education makes self-critical citizens capable of thinking creatively about democratic practices and social justice.

Keywords

Income Resis Ethical Ideal Harness Ethos 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alcoff, L. & Dalmiya, V. (1993): ‘Are ‘Old Wives’ Tales’ Justified?’, in: Alcoff, L. & Potter, E. (eds.), Feminist Epistemologies, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, M.J. & Mohanty, C.T. (1997): Feminist Genealogies, Colonial Legacies, Democratic Futures, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Ben-Ze’ev, A. (1993): ‘The Virtue of Modesty’. American Philosophical Quarterly, Vol.30, No. 3, pp.235-246.Google Scholar
  4. Blackmore, J. (1999): Troubling Women, Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cambron-McCabe, N. & McCarthy, M. (2005): ‘Educating School Leaders for Social Justice’. Educational Policy, Vol.19, No. 1, pp.201-222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Driver, Julia L. ‘The Virtues of Ignorance’. Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 86, No. 7, pp. 373-384.Google Scholar
  7. James, S. (2003): ‘Passion and Politics’, in: Hatzimoysis, A.(ed.), Philosophy and the Emotions., London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Koggel, C. (2002): ‘Equality Analysis in a Global Context: A Relational Approach’, in: Brennan S. (ed.), Feminist Moral Philosophy, Calgary: Canadian Journal of Philosophy.Google Scholar
  9. Mohanty, C.T. (2003): Feminism Without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity, Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Noddings, N. (1984): Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  11. Noddings, N. (1999): ‘Care, Justice and Equity’, in: Katz, M.S., Noddings, N. & Strike, K.A. (eds.), Justice and Caring: The Search for Common Ground in Education. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  12. Noddings, N. (2002): Starting at Home: Caring and Social Policy. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  13. Nuyen, A.T. (1998): ‘Just Modesty’, American Philosophical Quarterly, Vol.35, No. 1, pp.101-109.Google Scholar
  14. Rawls, J. (1971): A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University.Google Scholar
  15. Richards, N. (1988): ‘Is Humility a Virtue?’, American Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp.253-259.Google Scholar
  16. Statman, D. (1992): ‘Modesty, Pride and Realistic Self-Assessment’, The Philosophical Quarterly, Vol.42, No. 169, pp.420-438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. van Buitenen, J.A.B. (1975), The Mahābhārata (trans & ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Comparative Education Research Centre 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vrinda Dalmiya
    • 1
  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentUniversity of HawaiiHawaii

Personalised recommendations