Skip to main content

Is a Digital Model Worth a Thousand Pictures?

  • Conference paper

This communication addresses the use of a new type of referents database in the context of an architectural design studio. It discusses the results of design experiences held with the objective to study the cognitive effects of a teaching approach based on precedents and metaphors available as interactive and reusable digital models to students. The introduction of this referent-based approach is inspired by three major principles: the largely accepted fact that the creative work of architects is highly supported by referring to precedents and metaphors; the use of algorithmic digital methods to encapsulate architectural knowledge; and the constructivist approach to architectural design education. The study finds that the role of the modeled referents is helpful for the design studio learning, and that they are most creatively used when internalized by the student.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abel, C: 2004, Architecture, Technology and Process, Boston, Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akin, O: 2002, Case Based Instruction Strategies in Architecture, Design Studies 23(4): 407-431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J: 1998, Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, P: 2002, Approches méthodologiques et modes opératoires dans le processus de conception architecturale, in: M Borillo & J-P Goulette (eds), Cognition et création: Explorations cognitives des processus de conception, Mardaga, pp. 97-118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iordanova, I and Tidafi, T: 2005, Using historical know-how to model design references: digital method for enhancing digital design teaching, in: B Martens and A Brown (eds), CAAD Futures 2005, Springer, Vienna, pp. 197-206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalay, Y: 2004, Architecture’s New Media, The MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kocaturk, T and Veltkamp, M: 2005, Interdisciplinary Knowledge Modelling for Free-Form Design. Paper presented at the CAAD Futures 2005, Vienna, pp. 465-473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, B: 1979, Cognitive Strategies in Architectural Design, Ergonomics 22(1):59-68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leclercq, P and Heylighen, A: 2002, 5.8 Analogies per Hour, in: J Gero (ed), Artificial Intelligence in Design ’02, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 285-303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Léglise, M: 2000, Conception assistée: modélisation et interprétation, in: G De Paoli and T Tidafi (eds), Modélisation architecturale et outils informatiques entre cultures, Acfas, Les cahiers scientifiques, pp. 51-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minski, M: 1985, The Society of Mind, Simon and Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxman, R: 1994, Precedents in design: a computational model for the organisation of precedent knowledge, Design studies 15(2): 141-157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxman, R: 2004, Think-maps: teaching design thinking in design education, Design studies 25(1): 63-91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxman, R: 2006, Educating the Digital Design Thinker, Communicating Spaces 24th eCAADe Conference Proceedings, Volos, Greece, pp. 198-205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J: 1970, Le structuralisme, Presses Universitaires de France - PUF, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D: 1988, Designing: Rules, types and worlds, Design studies 9(3): 181-190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terzidis, K: 2006, Algorithmic Architecture: Architectural, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tidafi, T: 1996, Moyens pour la communication en architecture- Proposition de la modélisation d’actions pour la figuration architecturale. Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Montréal, Montréal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tidafi, T and Iordanova, I: 2006, Experimental Approach in an Architectural Design Studio, Communicating Spaces 24th eCAADe Conference Proceedings, Volos, Greece, pp. 852-858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinand, Y: 2004, New Modeling: Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yakeley, M: 2000, Digitally Mediated Design: Using Computer Programming to Develop a Personal Design Process, Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, MIT, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Iordanova, I., Tidafi, T., De Paoli, G. (2007). Is a Digital Model Worth a Thousand Pictures?. In: Dong, A., Moere, A.V., Gero, J.S. (eds) Computer-Aided Architectural Design Futures (CAADFutures) 2007. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6528-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6528-6_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6527-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6528-6

  • eBook Packages: Architecture and DesignEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics