Degradation of the Physical and Mechanical Properties of Pipeline Material Depending on Exploitation Term

  • Stefan Vodenicharov
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series book series (NAPSC)

Failures and breakdowns of transport pipelines are especially dangerous because they are connected with enormous material losses, environment damages and very often with serious human casualties and injuries. The worldwide experience in the exploitation of hundreds of thousands kilometers of gas and oil pipelines shows that the number of failures and the probability of catastrophes in the pipelines grows with the increasing operation time due to pipeline material ageing. The object of this investigation is the behavior of C55E (09Г2C) pipeline steel subject to long-term model static loading. The structure and mechanical properties in initial state are compared to the steel characteristics after 15 years stay under static loading by internal pressure. Particular attention is paid to the changes of strength and toughness which are of special importance for the reliable pipeline operation in oil and gas transportation.


degradation of the physical and mechanical properties of pipeline material depending on exploitation term 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Pashkobv, Y. and Georgiev, M., Effect of exploitation term on the change of the pipeline metal mechanical properties BЛИHИe, Proceedings of Technical University Plovdiv, vol. 7, Engineering Sciences, 2001 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Myasnikov, V., Assessment of the design reliability parameters of long term exploited pipelines in West Siberia, TGNGU, 2004 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pipeline failure causes, 2005.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pipeline Failures,
  5. 5.
    Failures of pipelines,
  6. 6.
    Causes of Pipeline Failures,
  7. 7.
    Dahlberg, E. and Bruno, T., Analysis of gas pipeline failure, NG-20, Report 125, December, 1990.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bonasso, S., Pipeline Safety, October 9, 2003.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Giedon, R. and Smith, D., An analyses of reportable incidence for natural gas transmission and gathering lines 1970 through 1978, NG-18, Report 121, September 1980.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goncharov, V., Analysis of North-European gas pipeline effects on the environment in the process of exploitation, J. Economics and Investment, VIIth International Ecological Forum Baltic Sea Day (in Russian)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Prusenko, B., Analysis of failures and accidents in Russia pipeline transport, 2005 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    Zvyagin, Y., How to avoid technogenetic catastrophes, International Conference “Current problems of industrial safety”, Sanct-Petersburg, 2005 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kelley, C., Pipeline safety, United state Senate, May, 2000.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Arulanandam, S. J., Wilson, D. J., and Hrudey, S. E., Accounting for Uncertainty in Predicting the Risk of Pipeline Failure, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G8, 2004.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
    Mochernyuk, N. et al., Effects of operation time and gas pressure on physical-mechanical characteristics of pipeline steel 19Γ, Gas Industry, No. 3, 1991 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yamaliev, K., Aging of pipe metal in the process of oil pipeline exploitation, VNIIOENG, series Oil transport and storage, 1990 (in Russian).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefan Vodenicharov
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Metal scienceSofiaBulgaria

Personalised recommendations