Predictions of Protein-Protein Interactions at the Atomic Scale

  • Shoshana J. Wodak
  • Raúl Mendez
  • Marc Lensink

The use of computational procedures to predict protein-protein interactions from sequence and structure information has attracted renewed interest in recent years with the realization that such procedures can fruitfully complement and guide experimental characterizations of these interactions. CAPRI (Critical Assessment of Predicted Interactions) the community-wide experiment for assessing blind predictions of protein complexes is playing an important role in fostering progress in protein docking algorithms – the computational procedures for predicting the 3D structure of a protein complex from those of the individual components. In this paper we provide our view of the major challenges that docking algorithms must meet. We then describe how current docking methods address these challenges by presenting a summary of results obtained in rounds 1-5 of the CAPRI experiment, and discuss the lessons learned from these results.

Keywords: protein interactions, protein complexes, docking, structure, predictions, homology modeling, side chain optimization, energy, calculations, conformational sampling


Protein Data Bank Interface Residue Docking Method Docking Procedure Docking Algorithm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bahadur, R.P., Chakrabarti, P., Rodier, F., Janin, J. (2004) A dissection of specific and nonspecific protein-protein interfaces. J. Mol. Biol. 336(4): 943-55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berman, H.M., Westbrook, J., Feng, Z., Gilliland, G., Bhat, T.N., Weissig, H., Shindyalov, I.N., Bourne, P.E. (2000) The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28(1): 235-42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Canutescu, A.A., Shelenkov, A.A., Dunbrack, R.L., Jr. (2003) A graph-theory algorithm for rapid protein side-chain prediction. Protein Sci. 12(9): 2001-2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen, R., Weng, Z. (2003) A novel shape complementarity scoring function for proteinprotein docking. Proteins 51(3): 397-408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Claverie, J.M. (2001) Gene number. What if there are only 30,000 human genes? Science 291(5507): 1255-1257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Edwards, A.M., Kus, B., Jansen, R., Greenbaum, D., Greenblatt, J., Gerstein, M. (2002) Bridging structural biology and genomics: assessing protein interaction data with known complexes. Trends Genet. 18(10): 529-536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fernandez-Recio, J., Totrov, M., Abagyan, R. (2003) ICM-DISCO docking by global energy optimization with fully flexible side-chains. Proteins 52(1): 113-117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fernandez-Recio, J., Totrov, M., Abagyan, R. (2004) Identification of protein-protein interaction sites from docking energy landscapes. J. Mol. Biol. 335(3): 843-865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fieulaine, S., Morera, S., Poncet, S., Mijakovic, I., Galinier, A., Janin, J., Deutscher, J., Nessler, S. (2002) X-ray structure of a bifunctional protein kinase in complex with its protein substrate HPr. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 13437-41.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. Fitzjohn, P.W., Bates, P.A. (2003) Guided docking: first step to locate potential binding sites. Proteins 52(1): 28-32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gavin, A.C., Aloy, P., Grandi, P., Krause, R., Boesche, M., Marzioch, M., Rau, C., Jensen, L.J., Bastuck, S., Dumpelfeld, B., Edelmann, A., Heurtier, M.A., Hoffman, V., Hoefert, C., Klein, K., Hudak, M., Michon, A.M., Schelder, M., Schirle, M., Remor, M., Rudi, T., Hooper, S., Bauer, A., Bouwmeester, T., Casari, G., Drewes, G., Neubauer, G., Rick, J.M., Kuster, B., Bork, P., Russell, R.B., Superti-Furga, G. (2006) Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery. Nature 440(7084): 631-6.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. Graille, M., Zhou, C.-Z., Receveur-Brechot, V., Collinet, B., Declerck, N., van Tilbeurgh, H. (2005) Activation of the LicT Transcriptional Antiterminator Involves a Domain Swing/Lock Mechanism Provoking Massive Structural Changes. J. Biol. Chem. 280: 14780-14789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gray, J.J., Moughon, S., Wang, C., Schueler-Furman, O., Kuhlman, B., Rohl, C.A., Baker, D. (2003) Protein-protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid-body displacement and side-chain conformations. J. Mol. Biol. 331(1): 281-299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Janin, J., Henrick, K., Moult, J., Eyck, L.T., Sternberg, M.J., Vajda, S., Vakser, I., Wodak, S.J. (2003) CAPRI: a Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions. Proteins 52(1): 2-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Janin, J., Rodier, F. (1995) Protein-protein interaction at crystal contacts. Proteins 23(4): 580-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Janin, J. (1997) Specific versus non-specific contacts in protein crystals. Nat. Struct. Biol. 4 (12): 973-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Janin, J. (1995). ‘Elusive affinities’ Proteins 21(1): 30-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jaramillo, A., Wodak, S.J. (2005) Computational protein design is a challenge for implicit solvation models. Biophys. J. 88(1): 156-171.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. Krogan, N.J., Cagney, G., Yu, H., Zhong, G., Guo, X., Ignatchenko, A., Li, J., Pu, S., Datta, N., Tikuisis, A.P., Punna, T., Peregrin-Alvarez, J.M., Shales, M., Zhang, X., Davey, M., Robinson, M.D., Paccanaro, A., Bray, J.E., Sheung, A., Beattie, B., Richards, D.P., Canadien, V., Lalev, A., Mena, F., Wong, P., Starostine, A., Canete, M.M., Vlasblom, J., Wu, S., Orsi, C., Collins, S.R., Chandran, S., Haw, R., Rilstone, J.J., Gandi, K., Thompson, N.J., Musso, G., St Onge, P., Ghanny, S., Lam, M.H., Butland, G., Altaf-Ul, A.M., Kanaya, S., Shilatifard, A., O’Shea, E., Weissman, J.S., Ingles, C.J., Hughes, T.R., Parkinson, J., Gerstein, M., Wodak, S.J., Emili, A., Greenblatt, J.F. (2006) Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 440 (7084): 637-43.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  20. Lo Conte, L., Chothia, C., Janin, J. (1999) The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. J. Mol. Biol. 285(5): 2177-98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McLachlan, A. (1982) Rapid Comparison of Protein Structures. Acta Crystallogr. A38: 871-873ADSGoogle Scholar
  22. Mendez, R., Leplae, R., De Maria, L., Wodak, S.J. (2003) Assessment of blind predictions of protein-protein interactions: current status of docking methods. Proteins 52(1): 51-67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mendez, R., Leplae, R., Lensink, M.F., Wodak, S.J. (2005) Assessment of CAPRI predictions in rounds 3-5 shows progress in docking procedures. Proteins 60(2): 150-69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moult, J. (2005) A decade of CASP: progress, bottlenecks and prognosis in protein structure prediction. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 15(3): 285-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ogata, K., Jaramillo, A., Cohen, W., Briand, J.P., Connan, F., Choppin, J., Muller, S., Wodak, S.J. (2003) Automatic sequence design of major histocompatibility complex class I binding peptides impairing CD8+ T cell recognition. J. Biol. Chem. 278(2): 1281-1290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rodier, F., Bahadur, R.P., Chakrabarti, P., Janin, J. (2005) Hydration of protein-protein interfaces. Proteins 60(1): 36-45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rohl, C.A., Strauss, C.E., Chivian, D., Baker, D. (2004) Modeling structurally variable regions in homologous proteins with rosetta. Proteins 55(3): 656-677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rohl, C.A., Strauss, C.E., Misura, K.M., Baker, D. (2004) Protein structure prediction using Rosetta. Methods Enzymol. 383: 66-93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sali, A., Glaeser, R., Earnest, T., Baumeister, W. (2003) From words to literature in structural proteomics. Nature 422(6928): 216-225.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  30. Sundberg, E.J., Li, H., Llera, A.S., McCormick, J.K., Tormo, J., Schlievert, P.M., Karjalainen, K., Mariuzza, R.A. (2002) Structures of Two Streptococcal Superantigens Bound to TCR beta Chains Reveal Diversity in the Architecture of T Cell Signaling. Structure (Camb.) 10: 687-99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Uetz, P., Giot, L., Cagney, G., Mansfield, T.A., Judson, R.S., Knight, J.R., Lockshon, D., Narayan, V., Srinivasan, M., Pochart, P., Qureshi-Emili, A., Li, Y., Godwin, B., Conover, D., Kalbfleisch, T., Vijayadamodar, G., Yang, M., Johnston, M., Fields, S., Rothberg, J.M. (2000) A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 403(6770): 623-627.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  32. Vajda, S. (2005) Classification of protein complexes based on docking difficulty. Proteins 60(2): 176-80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wodak, S.J., Janin, J. (2002) Structural basis of macromolecular recognition. Adv. Protein Chem. 61: 9-73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wodak, S.J., Mendez, R. (2004) Prediction of protein-protein interactions: the CAPRI experiment, its evaluation and implications. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 14(2): 242-249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wodak, S.J., Janin, J. (1978) Computer analysis of protein-protein interaction. J. Mol. Biol. 124: 323-342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shoshana J. Wodak
    • 1
  • Raúl Mendez
    • 2
  • Marc Lensink
    • 2
  1. 1.Structural Biology ProgramHospital for Sick ChildrenCanada
  2. 2.Service de Conformation de Macromolécules Biologiques, et BioinformatiqueCentre de Biologie Structurale et BioinformatiqueBelgium

Personalised recommendations