Influence of Climate Variability on Wheat Production in Portugal

  • C. Gouveia
  • R. M. Trigo
Part of the Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics book series (QGAG, volume 15)


In this work we describe the temporal evolution of wheat production and yield in Portugal and the spatial context of this production in Alentejo region (Southern Portugal). Then we have identified the geographical extent of this area and related with wheat yield, using remote sensing data. For this purpose, we have used the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), retrieved between 1982 and 1999 from the AVHRR instrument. The year-to-year variations in Portuguese vegetation greenness were estimated and related to national wheat yield. A significant correlation was found over Alentejo region and a validation using Corine2000 land cover map has confirmed the correspondence with arable land code pixels. Finally, we evaluate the relevance of the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) pattern in terms of wheat yield. A significant influence of the NAO, associated to spatial patterns of variation of different climatic fields, namely precipitation and radiation, on wheat yield in Alentejo region was found. The most significant monthly correlations were obtained for the two important stages in vegetative cycle, namely: February/March and April to June (NAO/Yield, Precipitation/Yield and\break Radiation/Yield).


Normalize Difference Vegetation Index North Atlantic Oscillation Wheat Yield Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Atkinson MD, Kettlewell PS, Hollins PD, Stephenson DB, Hardwick NV (2005) Summer climate mediates UK wheat quality response to winter North Atlantic Oscillation. Agric Forest Meteorol 130(2005):27–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnston AG, Livezey RE (1987) Classification, seasonality and persistence of low-frequency atmospheric circulation patterns. Mon Weather Rev 115:1083–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boken VK, Shaykewich CF (2002) Improving an operational wheat yield model using phonological phase-based Normalized Difference Vegetation Index, Int J Remote Sens 23(20): 4155–4168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cantelaube P, Terres J-M, Doblas-Reyes FJ (2004) Influence of climate variability on European agriculture —analysis of winter wheat production, Clim Res 27:135–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Feio M (1991) Clima e Agricultura. Ministério da Agricultura, Pescas e AlimentaçãoGoogle Scholar
  6. Gimeno L, Ribera P, Iglesias R,Torre L,Garcia R, Hernández E (2002) Identification of empirical relationships between indices of ENSO and NAO and agricultural yields in Spain, Clim Res 21:165–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hoogenboom G (2000) Contribution of agrometeorology to the simulation of crop production and its applications. Agric Meteorol 103:137–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hurrell JW (1995) Decadal trends in the north Atlantic oscillation: regional temperatures and precipitation. Science 269:676–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jones PD, Johnson T, Wheeler D (1997) Extension to the North Atlantic Oscillation using instrumental pressure observations from Gibraltar and south-west Iceland. Int J Climatol 17:1433–1450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kaufmann RK, Zhou L, Tucker CJ, Slayback D, Shabanov NV, Myneni RB, (2002) Reply to Comment on ‘Variations in northern vegetation activity inferred from satellite data of vegetation index during 1981–1999’ by Ahlbeck JR, J Geophys Res vol 107. no. D11, 10.1029/200IJD001516Google Scholar
  11. Mitchell,TD, Jones PD (2005) An improved method of constructing a database of monthly climate observations and associated high-resolution grids. Int J Climatol 25:693–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Williams JR, Kiniry KW (2002) Soil and Water Assessment Tool theoretical documentation, TWRI report TR-191, Texas Water Resources Institute College StationGoogle Scholar
  13. Osborn TJ, Briffa KR, Tett SFB, Jones PD, Trigo RM (1999) Evaluation of the North Atlantic Oscillation as simulated by a climate model. Clim Dyn 15:685–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rogers JC, (1984) The association between the North AtlanticOscillation and the Southern Oscillation in the Northern Hemisphere, Mon Weather Rev 112:1999–2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sampaio AJ (1990) A cultura do Trigo, Ministério da Agricultura, Pescas e AlimentaçãoGoogle Scholar
  16. Serreze MC, Carse F, Barry RG, Rogers JC (1997) Icelandic Low cyclone activity: climatological features, linkages with the NAO, and relationships with recent changes in the Northern Hemisphere circulation. J Climatol 10:453–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Trigo RM, Pozo-Vazquez D, Osborn TJ, Castro-Diez Y, Gámis-Fortis S, Esteban-Parra MJ (2004) North Atlantic Oscillation influence on precipitation, river flow and water resources in the Iberian Peninsula, Int J Climatol 24:925–944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tucker CJ, Pinzon JE, Brown ME, Slayback DA, Pak EW, Mahoney R, Vermote EF, El Saleous N (2005) An extended AVHRR 8-km NDVI dataset compatible with MODIS and SPOT vegetation NDVI data. Int J Remote Sens 26(20):4485–4498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Walker GT (1924) Correlations in seasonal variations of weather. IX Mem Ind Meteorol Dept 24:275–332Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Gouveia
  • R. M. Trigo

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations