Advertisement

Varieties of Educational Transformation: The Post-Socialist States of Central/Southeastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union

  • Iveta Silova
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE, volume 22)

The former socialist countries of Central/Southeastern Europe and the Soviet Union share many commonalities, while forming an increasingly diverse region of the world in terms of sociopolitical development. Among the most striking commonalities are the shared socialist past, as well as the sheer scale and significance of the political, economic, and social transformation since the collapse of socialism in 1989. Although all countries of the region have declared their aspiration to embrace the new values of democracy, capitalism, and market economies, the transformation process has been uneven across the region. By 2007, ten countries became new member states of the European Union (EU) — Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, the Slovak Republic, and Slovenia — signaling the emergence of open, liberal societies at least partially rooted in respect for the rule of law, human rights, and economic freedom. In some countries of Southeastern Europe and the former Soviet Union, however, democratic and free-market characteristics have shared the stage with “a high degree of authoritarianism, corporatism, cronyism, and state involvement in economic life” (Freedom House, 2005). This region also includes repressive autocracies, such as Belarus, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan, in which there is “little or no space for opposition political groupings and independent civic activism” (Freedom House, 2005). Approximately one third of all countries have experienced armed conflicts during the transformation period, resulting in devastating effects in all spheres of life.1

Given the diversity of these sociopolitical contexts, it is difficult to talk about the countries of Central/Southeastern Europe and the former Soviet Union as one homogeneous region. Nevertheless, these countries share several educational characteristics, as reflected in a number of educational legacies inherited from the socialist regime and a proclaimed aspiration to embrace Western educational values. Among the positive socialist legacies are solid infrastructures for educational provision and administration, fee-free education for all children, nearly universal general education enrolments, and high literacy rates. For all the concerns about its quality and comprehensiveness, the mass provision of socialist education undeniably helped to create a level of social cohesion (Heyneman, 1997, 2000), as well as very real compensatory legitimacy for the regime. During the socialist period, education also established a widely shared public expectation for the provision of mainstream schooling at little or no cost and on a fundamentally egalitarian basis (Silova et al., 2007). For all these achievements, the education systems of the post-socialist bloc were also rigidly bureaucratized, and narrowly and involuntarily vocational (Johnson, 2004). They were also institutionally fragmented, with different hierarchies of educational provision and training divided between different branch ministries, resulting in severe inefficiencies. The system was also characterized by uniform and exceptionally rigid conceptions of pedagogy and formal “didactic,” authoritarian and teacher-centered learning, overloaded and centrally mandated curricula, and insufficient attention to the quality and nature of individual student learning (Johnson, 2004; Silova, 2002). Finally, the educational systems had acute ideological weaknesses, including an imposition of socialist political indoctrination in schools.

Keywords

European Union Educational Reform Accession Country Bologna Process Central Asian Republic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ammermüler, A., Heijke, H., & Wöβmann, L. (2003). Schooling Quality in Eastern Europe: Education Production During Transition. Maastricht: Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson-Levitt, K. (2003). Local Meanings, Global Schooling. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anweiler, O. (1992). Some historical aspects of educational change in the former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. Oxford Studies in Comparative Education, 2(1), 29–40.Google Scholar
  4. Barkey, K. & von Hagen, M. (Eds.). (1997). After Empire: Multiethnic Societies and Nation-Building. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  5. Belkanov, N. (2000). Pedagogicheskaya sovetologiya kak nauchny fenomen (Pedagogical Sovietology as a scientific phenomenon). Pedagogika, 6(5), 81–87.Google Scholar
  6. Birzea, C. (1994). Educational Policies of the Countries in Transition. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Press.Google Scholar
  7. Birzea, C. (1997). The Dilemmas of the reform of Romanian Education: Shock Therapy, the Infusion of Innovation or Cultural Decommunization? Higher Education in Europe, XXII(3): pp. 71–80.Google Scholar
  8. Cerych, L. (1997). Educational reforms in Central and Eastern Europe: Processes and outcomes. European Journal of Education, 32(1), 75–97.Google Scholar
  9. Cowen, R. (1996). Last past the post: Comparative education, modernity and perhaps post-modernity. Comparative Education, 32(2), 151–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cowen, R. (2000). Comparing futures or comparing pasts? Comparative Education, 36(3), 333–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diamond, L., Plattner, F., & Yun-han Chu, Hung-mao Tien (1997). Consolidating Third-Wave Democracies: Themes and Perspectives. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Emirbayer, M. & Goodwin, J. (1994). Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency. American Journal of Sociology, 99(6), 1411–1454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. EUMAP (2002). Monitoring the EU Accession Process: Minority Protection. Budapest, Hungary: EU Monitoring and Advocacy Program, Open Society Institute.Google Scholar
  14. Freedom House (2005). Nations in Transit 2005. [Online] Available: www.freedomhouse.org
  15. Gerskovits, B. (1998). The Political Economy of Protest and Patience: East European and Latin American Transformations Compared. Budapest, Hungary: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Godon, R., Juceviciene, P., & Kodelja, Z. (2004). Philosophy of education in post-Soviet societies of Eastern Europe: Poland, Lithuania and Slovenia. Comparative Education, 40(4), 560–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hanson, S. E. (1997). The Leninist legacy, institutional change, and post-Soviet Russia. In B. Crawford & A. Lijphart (Eds.), Liberalization and Leninist Legacies: Comparative Perspectives on Democratic Institutions (pp. 228–251). Berkley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. Heyneman, S. (1997). Education and social stability: An essay. Compare, 27(1), 5–18.Google Scholar
  19. Heyneman, S. (2000). From the party/state to multiethnic democracy: Education and social cohesion in Europe and Central Asia. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(2), 171–191.Google Scholar
  20. IEA (2003). Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) 2003. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS and PIRLS International Study Center.Google Scholar
  21. IEA (2004). TIMSS 2003 International Mathematics Report. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS and PIRLS International Study Center.Google Scholar
  22. Interview with Ivan Wilhelm, Rector of Charles University, Prague (August 23, 2004). [Online]. Available: http://www.euractiv.com/en/education/interview-ivan-wilhelm-rector-charles-university-prague/article-128544
  23. Johnson, M. S. (1996). Western Models and Russian Realities in Postcommunist Education. Tertium Comparationis, 2(2), 119–132.Google Scholar
  24. Johnson, M. (2004). Trends in secular educational development in Azerbaijan and Central Asia: Implications for social stability and regional security. National Bureau of Asian Research Analysis, 15(4), 7–58.Google Scholar
  25. Kapustin, B. (2001). The End of ‘Transitology’? POLIS: The Journal of Political Studies, 4. [Online] Available: http://www.politstudies.ru/arch/2001/4/2-e.htm
  26. Karpov, V. & Lisovskaya, E. (2001). Reforms and Mutations in Russian Schooling: Implications for Theory of Educational Transitions. Paper presented at the 45th Annual Conference of Comparative and International Education Society. Washington DC, March 14–17.Google Scholar
  27. Lawn, M. & Lingard, B. (2002). Constructing a European policy space in educational governance: The role of transnational policy actors. European Educational Research Journal, 1(2), 290–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lindblad, S. & Popkewitz, T. (2004). Educational Restructuring: International Perspectives on Traveling Policies. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  29. Lijphart, A. & Waisman, C. (1996). Institutional Design in New Democracies. Eastern, Europe and Latin America. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  30. Luhmann, N. (1981). Politische Theorie im Wohlfahrtsstaat [Political theory in the welfare state] Munich, Germany: Olzog.Google Scholar
  31. Luhmann, N. (1990). Essays on Self-Reference. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  32. McLeish, E. (1998). Processes of educational transition in countries moving from authoritarian rule to democratic government. Oxford Studies in Comparative Education, 8(2), 9–22.Google Scholar
  33. Meyer, J. & Ramirez, F. (2000). The world institutionalization of education — origins and implications. In J. Schriewer (Ed.), Discourse formation in comparative education (pp. 111–132). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  34. Micklewright, J. (2000). Education, inequality, and transition. Innocenti Working Papers, Economic and Social Policy Series, No. 74. [Online]. Available: http://www.unicef-icdc.org.
  35. Ministry of Macroeconomics and Statistics & State Department of Statistics, Republic of Uzbekistan (2002). Women and Men of Uzbekistan: Statistical Volume. Tashkent, Uzbekistan: State Department of Statistics.Google Scholar
  36. Ministry of Public Education of the Republic of Tajikistan (2002). Monitoring of Learning Achievement in elementary schools of Tajikistan and the problem of school non-attendance. Dushanbe: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  37. Ministry of Education, Science and Youth Policy of the Kyrgyz Republic (2005). Monitoring of Learning Achievement. Bishkek: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  38. Mitter, W. (1992). Education in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union in a period of revolutionary change. Oxford Studies in Comparative Education, 2(1), 15–28.Google Scholar
  39. Mitter, W. (2003). A decade of transformation: Education policies in Central and Eastern Europe. In M. Bray (Ed.), Comparative Education: Continuing Traditions, New Challenges, and New Paradigms. London: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  40. OECD (1998). Reviews of National Policies for Education: Russian Federation. Paris, France:OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2001a). Thematic Review of National Policies for Education: Bosnia and Herzegovina. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Available: http://www.see-educoop.net/education_in/pdf/oecd.htm
  42. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2001b). Thematic Review of National Policies for Education: Croatia. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Available: http://www.see-educoop.net/education_in/pdf/oecd.htm
  43. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2004). Learning for Tomorrow's World: First Results from PISA 2003. [Online]. Available: http://www.pisa.oecd.org/document/5/0,2340,en_ 32252351_32236173_33917573_1_1_1_1,00.html (Read Chapter 4, which directly deals with the relationship between student performance & socioeconomic background).
  44. Open Society Institute (2002). Education Development in Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan: Challenges and Ways Forward. Budapest, Hungary: Education Support Program, Open Society Institute. [Online] Available: http://www.osi-edu.net/esp/events/materials/final.doc
  45. Open Society Institute (2007). Monitoring School Dropouts: Albania, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Mongolia, Slovakia, and Tajikistan. New York: Education Support Program of the Open Society Institute.Google Scholar
  46. Phillips, D. (2004). Toward a theory of policy attraction in education. In G. Steiner-Khamsi (Ed.), The Global Politics of Educational Borrowing and Lending. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  47. Phillips, D. & Oancea, A. (2005). 15 Years On: Educational Transitions in Central and Eastern Europe. Directions for Educational Research and Policy in the Post-Communist EU Accession and Candidate Countries. [Scientific Report of the ESF SCSS Exploratory Workshop, Oxford, United Kingdom, 8–10 July 2005.]Google Scholar
  48. PILI (2005). Separate and Unequal: Combating Discrimination Against Roma in Education: A Source Book (Public Interest Law Initiative, Columbia Law School). [Online] Available: http://www.pili.org/2005r/content/view/53/53/
  49. Przeworski, A. (1991). Democracy and Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Rado, P. (2001). Education in Transition. Budapest: Open Society Institute.Google Scholar
  51. RFE/RL (2003. July 11). Central Asia Report, 3(24).Google Scholar
  52. Schriewer, J. (1988). The method of comparison and the need for externalization: Methodological criteria and sociological concepts. In J. Schriewer & B. Holmes (Eds.), Theories and Methods in Comparative Education (pp. 25–86). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  53. Schriewer, J. (2000). World system and interrelationship networks: The internationalization of education and the role of comparative inquiry. In T. Popkewitz (Ed.), Educational Knowledge: Changing Relationships Between The State, Civil Society, and the Educational Community (pp. 305–349). New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  54. Schriewer, J. & Martinez, C. (2004). Constructions of internationality in education. In G. Steiner-Khamsi (ed.), The Global Politics of Educational Borrowing and Lending. New York: TC Press.Google Scholar
  55. Silova, I. (2006). From Sites of Occupation to Symbols of Multiculturalism: Re-conceptualizing Minority Education in Post-Soviet Latvia. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  56. Silova, I. (2005). Traveling policies: Hijacked in Central Asia. European Educational Research Journal, 4(1), 50–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Silova, I. (2004). Adopting the language of the new allies. In G. Steiner-Khamsi (Ed.), The Global Politics of Educational Borrowing (pp. 75–87). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  58. Silova, I. (2002). Returning to Europe: Facts, fiction, and fantasies of post-Soviet education reform. In A. Nóvoa & M. Lawn (Eds.), Fabricating Europe: The Formation of an Educational Space (pp. 87–109). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  59. Silova, I., Budiene, V., & Bray, M. (2006). Education in a Hidden Marketplace: Monitoring of Private Tutoring. New York: Open Society Institute.Google Scholar
  60. Silova, I. & Magno, C. (2004). Gender equity unmasked: Revisiting democracy, gender, and education in post-socialist Central/Southeastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union. Comparative Education Review, 48(4), 417–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Silova, I. & Steiner-Khamsi, F. (2008). How NGOs React: Globalization and Education Reform in the Caucasus, Central Asia, and Mongolia. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
  62. Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2000). Transferring education, displacing reforms. In Jürgen Schriewer (Ed.), Discourse Formations in Comparative Education (pp. 155–187). Frankfurt & New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  63. Steiner-Khamsi, G. (Ed.). (2004). The Global Politics of Educational Borrowing and Lending. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  64. Steiner-Khamsi, G. & Stolpe, I. (2006). Educational Import in Mongolia: Local Encounters with Global Forces. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  65. Silova, I., Johnson, M., & Heyneman, S. (2007). Education and the Crisis of Social Cohesion in Azerbaijan and Central Asia. Comparative Education Review, 51(2), 159–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. State Statistical Agency of the Republic of Tajikistan (1998). Report on Gender Statistics in Republic of Tajikistan. [On-line] Available: www.undp.uz/GID/eng/tajikistan/GENERAL/GGA/tj_stat.html
  67. Tjeldvoll, A. (2006). Guest Editor's introduction: Education in the Balkans—challenged to change. European Education, 38(1), 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tomaševski, K. (2005). Globalizing what: Education as a human right or as a traded service? Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 12(1), 1–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. UNESCO (2005). Education for All Global Monitoring Report 2005: The Quality Imperative. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.Google Scholar
  70. UNICEF (2001). A decade of transition. Florence, Italy: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre.Google Scholar
  71. UNICEF TransMONEE (2005). Database, UNICEF IRC, Florence Transparency International (2005). The 2005 Corruption Perception Index. [Online] Available: http://www.transparency.org/pressreleases_archive/2004/2004.10.20.cpi.en.html
  72. UNICEF (2000). Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS-2). [Online]. Available: http://www.ucw-project.org
  73. Verdery, K. (1996). What was socialism and what comes next? Princeton, NJ: Princeton Academic Press.Google Scholar
  74. Watson, P. (2000). Re-thinking Transition: Globalism, Gender and Class. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 2(2), 185–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zajda, J. (2003). Educational reform and transformation in Russia: Why education reforms fail. European Education, 35(1), 58–88.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Iveta Silova
    • 1
  1. 1.Lehigh UniversityPennsylvaniaUSA

Personalised recommendations