Advertisement

Comparative Education: Historical Reflections

  • Andreas M. Kazamias
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE, volume 22)

The term comparative education (CE) is not a mono-faceted or monophonic concept/intellectual system. It is an inter- and multidisciplinary ‘human science’, an episteme in Nicholas Hans’ sense of Vergleichende Erziehungwissenschaft (Hans, 1959: 299). Historically, the genealogical roots of CE have been traced to the ‘modernist’ epoch of the European Enlightenment of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. Since that time, comparative studies of educational systems, problems, phenomena or processes have been conceptualised, approached and constructed from a variety of perspectives, through a variety of methodological prisms/lenses, and using a variety of research methods and techniques. Like the Greek mythical demigod Proteus, CE at different historical periods has donned different attire, woven by differently coloured epistemological, methodological and ideological threads. Consequently, it has appeared in a variety of guises refl ecting to a large degree, the intellectual, methodological and cultural strands and fads of the times. Hence, the appellation of CE as a protean episteme (Kazamias, 2001). To put it differently, in refl ecting historically on CE as a ‘human science’, as this chapter purports to do, I shall ‘theorise’ about ‘generations’ and ‘types’ of comparative education discourse.

Keywords

National System Historical Approach Chicago School Human Capital Theory Comparative Discourse 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, R., Broadfoot, P. & Phillips, D. (Eds.) (1999). Learning from Comparing: New directions in comparative educational research, Vol. 1. Contents, classrooms and outcomes. Oxford: Symposium Books.Google Scholar
  2. Altbach, P. G. (1991). Trends in comparative education. Comparative Education Review, 35, 491–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnove, R. & Torres, C.A. (Eds.) (1999). Comparative Education: The Dialectic of the Global and the Local. Lahman, MD: Rowan and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  4. Barber, B. R. (1972). Science, salience and social scientific inquiry. Comparative Education Review, 16, 424–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Broadfoot, P. (1999). Stones from other hills may serve to polish the jade of this one: towards a neo-comparative ‘learnology’ of education. Compare, 29, 217–231.Google Scholar
  6. Carnoy, M. & Samoff, J. (1990). Education and social transformation in the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Carnoy, M. (1974). Education as cultural imperialism. New York: David McKay.Google Scholar
  8. Carnoy, M. (1983). The state and political theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Coleman, J. S. (1965). Education and Political Development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Eckstein, M. (1977). Comparative study of educational achievement. Comparative Education Review, 21(2/3), 345–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fraser, S. (1964). Jullien's plan for comparative education 1816—1817. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  12. Halsey, A.J., Floud, J. & Anderson, C.A. (Eds.) (1961). Education, economy and society. London: Collier-MacMillan.Google Scholar
  13. Hans, N. (1949). Comparative Education: a study of educational factors and traditions. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  14. Hans, N. (1959). The historical approach to comparative education, International Review of Education, V(3), 299–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Holmes, B. (1958).The problem approach in comparative education: Some methodological considerations. Comparative Education Review, 2(1).Google Scholar
  16. Holmes, B. (1965). Problems in education: A comparative approach. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  17. Holmes, B. (1981). Comparative education: Some consideration of method. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  18. Hufner, K., Meyer, J. W. & Nauman, J. (1987). Comparative education policy research: a world society perspective. In M. Dierkew, H. N. Weiler & A. B. Antal (Eds.), Comparative policy research learning from experience. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hurn, Ch. J. (1978). The limits and possibilities of schooling: An introduction to the sociology of education. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  20. Jones, P. E. (1971). Comparative education: Purpose and method. Queensland: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
  21. Kandel, I. L. (1933). Comparative education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  22. Kandel, I. L. (1955). The new era in education: a comparative study. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  23. Karabel, J. & Halsey, A. H. (1977). Power and ideology in education. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Kazamias, A. M. & Massialas, B. (1965). Tradition and change in education: A comparative study. Englewood-Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  25. Kazamias, A. M. & Massialas, B. (1982). Comparative education. In Encyclopedia of Educational Research. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  26. Kazamias, A. M. & Schwartz, K. (1977). Intellectual and ideological perspectives in comparative education: an interpretation. Comparative Education Review, 21, 153–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kazamias, A. M. (1963). History, science and comparative education: a study in methodology. International Review of Education, 8, 383–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kazamias, A. M. (1991) Pangosmia Krisi stin Ekpaideusi — ennoiologikes diasafiniseis kai provlimatismoi [World crisis in education — conceptual clarifications and problematics]. In Y. Pyrgiotakis & Y. Kanakis (Eds.), Pangosmia Krisi stin Ekpaideusi [World crisis in education]. Athens: Grigoris.Google Scholar
  29. Kazamias, A. M. (2001). Re-inventing the historical in comparative education: reflections on a protean episteme by a contemporary player. Comparative Education. 37(4), 439–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Larsen, M. (2001). Reinventing the historical in comparative education: Bridging the gap through Foucault. Paper presented at the Comparative and International Conference in San Antonio.Google Scholar
  31. Marshall, P. (1973). Comments on Noah and Eckstein's “Model Hypothesis I”. Comparative Education Review, 17(1), 91–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Masemann, V. & Welch, A. (Eds.) (1997). Tradition, Modernity and Post-modernity in Comparative Education. International Review of Education, 43(5&6).Google Scholar
  33. Noah, H. & Eckstein, M. (1969). Toward a Science of Comparative Education. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  34. Paulston, R. (1977). Social and educational change. Comparative Education Review, 21, 371–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Psacharopoulos, G. (Ed.) (1987). Economics of Education: Research and Studies. Amsterdam: Elsevier, San Francisco; Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  36. Sadler, M. (1964). How far can we learn anything of practical value from the study of foreign systems of education?. Comparative Education Review, 7(3), 307–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Toulmin, S. (1963). Foresight and understanding: An enquiry into the aims of science. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  38. Tretheway, A. R. (1976). Introducing comparative education. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas M. Kazamias

    There are no affiliations available

    Personalised recommendations