Advertisement

Date Palm Phoenix dactylifera L. Micropropagation

  • J. M. Al-Khayri

Date palm micropropagation began a quarter of a century ago (Reuveni, 1979; Reynolds & Murashige, 1979; Tisserat, 1979) and has progressed relatively slowly due to its inherent slow growth nature and limited research resources available to the developing countries where date palm is mostly grown. Several review articles describing early work on plant regeneration through indirect somatic embryogenesis and indirect adventitious organogenesis (Benbadis, 1992; Omar et al., 1992; Tisserat, 1984). Reports demonstrating the ability to regenerate date palm through direct regeneration, without callus stage, are also available (Sudhersan et al., 1993). Micropropagation through direct regeneration is thought to reduce the potential for undesirable somaclonal variants among regenerants while somatic embryogenesis mediated by callus stage is highly efficient and more popular in research laboratories (Al-Khayri, 2005).

In recent years, several studies have examined various components of the culture medium including sucrose (Veramendi & Navarro, 1996), silver nitrate (Al-Khayri & Al-Bahrany, 2001, 2004a), biotin and thiamine (Al-Khayri, 2001), auxins and salt strength (Al-Khayri, 2003), and other tissue culture factors (Bekheet et al., 2001). Cell suspension cultures have been employed to study aspects related to physiology (Al-Khayri, 2002; Al-Khayri & Al-Bahrany, 2004b), and somatic embryogenesis (Fki et al., 2003; Zouine et al., 2005). Expected to revolutionize date palm propagation, development of synthetic seeds is gaining research interest (Bekheet et al., 2002). In addition to offering an effective propagation means, tissue culture proved applicable in genetic improvement of date palm through induced mutations and in vitro selection (El Hadrami et al., 2005; Jain, 2005).

The micropropagation protocol described herein is based on indirect somatic embryogenesis using apical shoot tip explant for callus induction and subsequent plant regeneration.

Keywords

Somatic Embryo Somatic Embryogenesis Callus Induction Date Palm Leaf Primordia 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Al-Khayri, J.M. (2001) Optimization of biotin and thiamine requirements for somatic embryogenesis of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.). In vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 37, 453-456.Google Scholar
  2. Al-Khayri, J.M. (2002) Growth, proline accumulation, and ion content in NaCl-stressed callus cultures of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.). In vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 38, 79-82.Google Scholar
  3. Al-Khayri, J.M. (2003) In vitro germination of somatic embryos in date palm: effect of auxin concentration and strength of MS salts. Curr. Sci. 84, 101-104.Google Scholar
  4. Al-Khayri, J.M. (2005) Date palm Phoenix dactylifera L. In: Jain, S.M., Gupta, P.K. (Eds), Protocols of Somatic Embryogenesis in Woody Plants, Springer, Berlin, pp. 309-318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Al-Khayri, J.M. & Al-Bahrany, A.M. (2001) Silver nitrate and 2-isopentyladenine promote somatic embryogenesis in date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.). Sci. Horti. 89, 291-298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Al-Khayri, J.M. & Al-Bahrany, A.M. (2004a) Genotype-dependent in vitro response of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cultivars to silver nitrate. Sci. Horti. 99, 153-162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Al-Khayri, J.M. & Al-Bahrany, A.M. (2004b) Growth, water content, and proline accumulation in drought-stressed callus of date palm. Biol. Plant. 48, 105-108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barreveld, W.H. (1993) Date Palm Products. FAO Agricultural Services Bulletin No. 101, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. www.fao.org/docrep/t0681e/t0681e00.htm
  9. Bekheet, S.A., Taha, H.S. & Saker, M.M. (2001) Factors affecting in vitro multiplication of date palm. Biol. Plant. 44, 431-433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bekheet, S.A., Taha, H.S., Saker, M.M. & Moursy, H.A. (2002) A synthetic seed system of date palm through somatic embryogenesis encapsulation. Annals Agric. Sci. 47, 325-337.Google Scholar
  11. Ben Abdallah, A. & Lepoivre, P. (2000) Production of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) fruit and diploid embryos following gibberellic acid treatment of unpollinated female inflorescences. Cahiers Agricultures 9, 467-473.Google Scholar
  12. Benbadis, A.K. (1992) Coconut and date palm. In: Hammerschlag, F.A. & Litz, R.E. (Eds), pp. 383-400, Biotechnology of Perennial Fruit Crops. CAB International, Wallingford.Google Scholar
  13. Bhaskaran, S.H. & Smith, R.H. (1992) Somatic embryogenesis from shoot tip and immature inflorescence of Phoenix dactylifera L. cv. Barhee. Plant Cell Rep. 12, 22-25.Google Scholar
  14. El Hadrami, A., El Idrissi-Tourane, A., El Hassni, M., Daayf, F. & El Hadrami, I. (2005) Toxin-based invitro selection and its potential application to date palm for resistance to the bayoud Fusarium wilt. C. R. Biol. 328, 732-744.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. FAOSTAT (2006) Food and Agriculture Organization Statistical Database. www.apps.fao.org
  16. Fki, L., Masmoudi, R., Drira, N. & Rival, A. (2003) An optimized protocol for plant regeneration from embryogenic suspension cultures of date palm, Phoenix dactylifera L., cv. Deglet Nour. Plant Cell Rep. 21, 517-524.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Jain, S. (2005) Major mutation-assisted plant breeding programs supported by FAO/IAEA. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 82, 113-123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kunert, K.J., Baaziz, M. & Cullis, C.A. (2003) Techniques for determination of true-to-type date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) plants: a literature review. Emirates J. Agri. Sci. 15, 1-16.Google Scholar
  19. Mater, A.A. (1987) Production and cryogenic freezing of date palm germplasm and regeneration of plantlets from frozen material. Iraqi J. Agr. Sci. 5, 35-49.Google Scholar
  20. Murashige, T. & Skoog, F. (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15, 473-497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mycock, D.J., Berjak, P., Pammenter, N.W., Vertucci, C.W., Ellis, R.H., Black, M., Murdoch, A.J. & Hong, T.D. (1997) Cryopreservation of somatic embryoids of Phoenix dactylifera. Curr. Plant Sci. Biotechnol. Agric. 30Google Scholar
  22. Omar, M.S., Hameed, M.K. & Al-Rawi, M.S. (1992) Micropropagation of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.). In Bajaj, Y.P.S. (Ed), Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, Protoplast and Genetic Engineering, Vol. 18, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 471-492.Google Scholar
  23. Reuveni, O. (1979) Embryogenesis and plantlets growth of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) derived from callus tissues. Plant Physiol. 63, 138.Google Scholar
  24. Reynolds, J.F. & Murashige, T. (1979) Asexual embryogenesis in callus cultures of palms. In vitro 15, 383-387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Saker, M., Adawy, S., Mohamed, A. & El-Itriby, H. (2006) Monitoring of cultivar identity in tissue culture-derived date palms using RAPD and AFLP analysis. Biol. Plant. 50, 198-204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Srisawat, T., Kanchanapoom, K., Pattanapanyasat, K., Srikul, S. & Chuthammathat, W. (2005) Flow cytometric analysis of oil palm: a preliminary analysis for cultivars and genomic DNA alteration Songklanakarin. J. Sci. Technol. 27, 645-652.Google Scholar
  27. Sudhersan, C., Abo El-Nil & Al-Baiz, A. (1993) Occurrence of direct somatic embryogenesis on the sword leaf of in vitro plantlets of Phoenix dactylifera L., cultivar Barhee. Curr. Sci. 65, 887-888.Google Scholar
  28. Tisserat, B. (1979) Propagation of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) in vitro. J. Exp. Bot. 30, 1275-1283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tisserat, B. (1984) Date palm. In: Sharp, W.R., Evans, D.A., Ammirato, P.V. & Yamada, Y. (Eds), Handbook of Plant Cell Culture, Vol. 2, Macmillan Publishing Company, NY, pp. 505-545.Google Scholar
  30. Tisserat, B., Gabr, M.F. & Sabour, M.T. (1985) Viability of cryogenically treated date palm pollen. Date Palm J. 4, 25-31.Google Scholar
  31. Veramendi, J. & Navarro, L. (1996) Influence of physical conditions of nutrient medium and sucrose on somatic embryogenesis of date palm. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 45, 159-164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zaid, A. (2002) Date Palm Cultivation. FAO Agricultural Services Bulletin No. 156, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. www.fao.org/docrep/006/y4360e/y4360e00.htm
  33. Zouine, J., El Bellaj, M., Meddich, A., Verdeil, J.-L. & El Hadrami, I. (2005) Proliferation and germination of somatic embryos from embryogenic suspension cultures in Phoenix dactylifera. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 82, 83-92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. M. Al-Khayri
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, College of Agricultural and Food SciencesKing Faisal UniversitySaudi Arabi

Personalised recommendations