Advertisement

The Immune Self Code: From Correspondence to Complexity

  • Yair Neuman
Part of the Biosemiotics book series (BSEM, volume 1)

Codes are conventions of correspondence between realms. These conventions may be considered emergent products of complex microlevel interactions. In this chapter, I illustrate the complexity of coding by discussing the immune self. I argue that our evolving understanding of the immune self bears a striking resemblance to the way our understanding of signs evolved. According to the thesis presented in this chapter, the immune system is a meaning-making system and therefore a biosemiotic analysis of the immune self may shed new light on a variety of unsolved theoretical questions in immunology.

Keywords

Immune System Major Histocompatibility Complex Sperm Cell Identity Marker Contextualist Approach 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson CC, Matzinger P 2000 Danger: the view from the bottom of the cliff. Seminars in Immunology 12:231–238CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Barbieri M 2003 The Organic Codes. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Bersini H 2003 Revising idiotypic immune networks. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2801:164–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buckland J 2002 Sex is good for you! Nature Reviews Immunology 2:148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Choudhury SRC, Knapp L 2000 Human reproductive failure I: immunological factors. Human Reproduction Update 7:113–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen IR 1994 Kadishman’s tree, Escher’s angels, and the immunological homunculus. In: Coutinho A, Kazatchkine MD (eds) Autoimmunity: Physiology and Disease. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp. 7–18Google Scholar
  7. Cohen IR 2000a Discrimination and dialogue in the immune system. Seminar in Immunology 12:21–219Google Scholar
  8. Cohen IR 2000b Tending Adam’s Garden. Academic Press, NewYorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Efroni S, Cohen I 2002 Simplicity belies a complex system: a response to the minimal model of immunity of Langman and Cohn. Cellular Immunology 216:23–30CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Efroni S, Cohen IR 2003 The heuristics of biologic theory: the case of self-noself discrimination. Cellular Immunology 223:87–89CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Howes M 1998 The self of philosophy and the self of immunology. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 42:118–130PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Janeway CA Jr. 1992 The immune system evolved to discriminate infectious nonself from noninfectious self. Immunology Today 13:11–16CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Jerne NK 1974 Toward a network theory of the immune system. Ann. Immunol. (Inst. Pasteur) 125c:373–389Google Scholar
  14. Jerne NK 1984 Idiotypic networks and other preconceived ideas. Immunological Review 79:5–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Klein J 1982 Immunology: The science of self nonself discrimination. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Langman RE, Cohn M 2000 A minimal model for the self-nonself discrimination: a return to the basics. Seminars in Immunology 12:180–195Google Scholar
  17. McLachlan RI 2002 Basis, diagnosis and treatment of immunological infertility in men. Journal of Reproductive Immunology 57:35–45CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Matzinger P 2002 The danger model: A renewed sense of self. Science 296:301–305CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Mellor AL, Munn DH 2000 Immunology at the maternal-fetal interface: lessons for the T cell tolerance and suppression. Annual Review of Immunology 18:367–391CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Merrell F 1997 Peirce, Signs and Meaning. Toronto University Press, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  21. Neuman Y 2004 Meaning making in the immune system. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 47:317–328CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Neuman Y 2005a Meaning making in language and biology. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 48:317–327CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Neuman Y 2005b Why do we need signs in biology? Rivisita di Biologia/Biology Forum 98:497–513Google Scholar
  24. Neuman Y 2006 Cryptobiosis: a new theoretical perspective. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology 92:258–267CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Neuman Y (2007) Immune memory, immune oblivion: a lesson from Funes the memorious. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology (submitted)Google Scholar
  26. Paton R 2002 Process, structure and context in relation to integrative biology. BioSystems 64:63–72CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Rosen SM 2004 What is a radical recursion? S.E.E.D. 4(1):38–57Google Scholar
  28. Saussure F de 1972 Course in General Linguistics. Trans. Harris R Duckworth, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. Schwartz M et al. 1999 Innate and adaptive immune responses can be beneficial for CNS repair. Trends in Neuroscience 22:295–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shukman A (ed.) 1983 Bakhtin School Papers. RPT Publications, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  31. Tauber AI 1996 The Immune Self: Theory or metaphor? Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  32. Tauber AI 1997 Historical and philosophical perspectives concerning immune cognition. Journal of the History of Biology 30:419–440CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Tauber AI 1998 Conceptual shifts in immunology: comments on the “two-way” paradigm. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19:457–473CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Tauber AI 1999 The elusive immune self: a case of category errors. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 42:459–474PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Tauber AI 2002 The biological notion of self and non-self. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/biology-self
  36. Thibault PJ 2005 Saussure and beyond. Lecture one: Speech and writing: two distinct systems of sign. Available at: www.chass.utoronto.ca/epc/srb/cyber/thi1.html
  37. Vaz NM, Varela FJ 1978 Self and non-sense: an organism-centered approach to immunology. Medical Hypotheses 4:231–267CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Volosinov VN 1986 Maximum and the Philosophy of Language. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  39. Abbreviations of Peirce’s writings:Google Scholar
  40. Peirce, C. SGoogle Scholar
  41. MS xxx (number) = Peirce manuscriptsGoogle Scholar
  42. CP x.xxx (volume.paragraph) = Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 8 volumes. Vols 1–6, Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss (ed.), vols. 7–8, Arthur W. Burks (ed.) Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 1931–1958Google Scholar
  43. EP x:xxx (volume:page number) = The Essential Peirce. Selected Philosophical Writings. Vol. 1 (1867–1893), Nathan Houser & Christian Kloesel (eds), 1992, vol. 2 (1893–1913), Peirce Edition Project (ed.), 1998. Indiana University Press, Bloomington/IndianapolisGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yair Neuman
    • 1
  1. 1.Ben-Gurion University of the NegevIsrael

Personalised recommendations