Exposure of organisms in the environment to ionizing radiation is generally considered to be harmful, regardless of the dose. This assumption derives directly from the basic assumption used for human radiation protection, that harm is directly proportional to dose, without a threshold. The consequence of combined exposures is generally unknown, but is assumed to be either additive or multiplicative. We have examined the in vivo and in vitro responses of a variety of cells and organisms. We show that exposure to one stressor can influence the outcome of a subsequent exposure to the same or another stressor. In many cases, pre-exposure to one stressor appeared to induce an adaptive response that mitigated the harm from a second stressor. These observations challenge the basic assumptions used in environmental protection strategies, suggesting that new approaches are needed. Keywords: combined stressors; radiation; heat; chlorine; non-human biota
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Calabrese, E. J., 2004, Hormesis: from marginalization to mainstream; A case for hormesis as the default dose-response model in risk assessment. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 197: 125–136.
Calabrese, E. J. and Baldwin L. A., 2000, The effects of gamma rays on longevity. Biogerontology 1: 309–319.
Calabrese, E. J. and Baldwin L. A., 2003a, The hormetic dose-response model is more common than the threshold model in toxicology. Toxicol. Sci. 71: 246–250.
Calabrese, E. J. and Baldwin L. A., 2003b, Toxicology rethinks its central belief. Nature 421: 691–692.
Mitchel, R. E. J., 2006, Low doses of radiation are protective in vitro and in vivo: Evolutionary origins. Dose Response 4: 75–90.
Mitchel, R. E. J. and Morrison D. P., 1982, Heat-shock induction of ionizing radiation resistance in saccharomyces cerevisiae. Transient changes in growth cycle distribution and recombinational ability. Radiat. Res. 92: 182–187.
Mitchel, R. E. J., Jackson, J. S., McCann, R. A. and Boreham, D. R., 1999, Adaptive response modification of latency for radiation-induced myeloid leukemia in CBA/H mice. Radiat. Res. 152: 273–279.
Parsons, P. A., 2000, Hormesis: an adaptive expectation with emphasis on ionizing radiation. J. Appl. Toxicol. 20: 103–112.
Parsons, P. A., 2002, Radiation hormesis: challenging LNT theory via ecological and evolutionary considerations. Health Phys. 82: 513–516.
Parsons, P. A., 2003, Metabolic efficiency in response to environmental agents predicts hormesis and invalidates the linear no-threshold premise: ionizing radiation as a case study. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 33: 443–449.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mitchel, R.E.J., Audette-Stuart, M., Yankovich, T. (2007). Effects of Ionizing Radiation Combined with Other Stressors, on Non-Human Biota. In: Mothersill, C., Mosse, I., Seymour, C. (eds) Multiple Stressors: A Challenge for the Future. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6335-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6335-0_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6333-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6335-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)