Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Habitat and landscape factors associated with neotropical waterbird occurrence and richness in wetland fragments

  • Original Paper
  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Vertebrate Conservation and Biodiversity

Part of the book series: Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation ((TOBC,volume 5))

Abstract

Habitat destruction alters the structure and spatial arrangement of remnants and creates a novel matrix, affecting the structure of biological communities. This study evaluated the contribution of patch, class and landscape level attributes of 42 wetland fragments and surrounding landscapes on the richness, abundance and presence of waterbird species. Twelve monthly censuses identified 55 species––ranging from 3 to 40 among fragments, and a total of 84,286 birds––ranging from 15 to 19,322. Wetland areas varied from 0.2 ha to 145.2 ha. The presence of 37 out of 42 species could be predicted from the structure of the fragments and the landscapes. The most important predictors were the wetland area (22 models), the rice field matrix permeability (13 models), the microhabitat richness (7 models), the wetland connectivity (5 models), and the wetland isolation (5 models). Discriminant analysis showed that fragments richer in species than expected from their areas, are found in landscapes with greater connectivity and matrix permeability than the species-poor fragments. The total area of rice fields was not related to the richness, abundance or presence of waterbirds in the wetlands fragments. The results suggest that the maintenance of the connectivity among fragments and the matrix permeability through rice-fields could be managed to foster the waterbird conservation at the landscape scale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Boecklen WJ (1986) Effects of habitat heterogeneity on the species area relationships of forest birds. J Biogeogr 13:59–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brotons L, Monkkonen M, Martin JL (2003) Are fragments islands? Landscape context and density–area relationships in boreal forest birds. Am Nat 162:343–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown M, Dinsmore JJ (1986) Implications of marsh size and isolation for marsh bird management. J Wildl Manage 50:392–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao Y, Williams DD, Larsen DP (2002) Comparison of ecological communities: the problem of sample representativeness. Ecol Monogr 72:41–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celada C, Bogliani G (1993) Breeding bird communities in fragmented wetlands. Boll Zool 60:73–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman BD (1981) On random placement and species–area relations. Math Biosci 54:191–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czech HA, Parsons KC (2002) Agricultural wetlands and waterbirds: a review. Waterbirds 25:56–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day JH, Colwell MA (1998) Waterbird communities in rice fields subjected to different post-harvest treatments. Colonial Waterbirds 21:185–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond JM (1976) Island biogeography and conservation––strategy and limitations. Science 193:1027–1029

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning JB, Danielson BJ, Pulliam HR (1992) Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes. Oikos 65:169–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elphick CS (2000) Functional equivalency between rice fields and seminatural wetland habitats. Conserv Biol 14:181–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erwin RM (2002) Integrated management of waterbirds: beyond the conventional. Waterbirds 25:5–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L (2002) Effect of habitat fragmentation on the extinction threshold: a synthesis. Ecol Appl 12:346–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L, Merriam G (1994) Conservation of fragmented populations. Conserv Biol 8:50–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairbairn SE, Dinsmore JJ (2001) Local and landscape-level influences on wetland bird communities of the prairie pothole region of Iowa, USA. Wetlands 21:41–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer J, Fazey I, Briese R, Lindenmayer DB (2005) Making the matrix matter: challenges in Australian grazing landscapes. Biodivers Conserv 14:561–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes AdS, Magalhães Júnior AMd (2004) Arroz irrigado no Sul do Brasil. Embrapa, Pelotas

    Google Scholar 

  • Guadagnin DL, Peter AS, Perello LFC, Maltchik L (2005) Spatial and temporal patterns of waterbird assemblages in fragmented wetlands of Southern Brazil. Waterbirds 28:261–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson EJ Parker GR (1992) Relationships between landcover proportion and indexes of landscape spatial pattern. Landsc Ecol 7:101–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haig SM, Mehlman DW, Oring LW (1998) Avian movements and wetland connectivity in landscape conservation. Conserv Biol 12:749–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • INPE (2002) Tutorial de introdução ao SPRING (Sistema de Processamento de Informações Georreferenciadas) Version Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais, São José dos Campos, São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson AR, Wiens JA, Milne BT, Crist TO (1992) Animal movements and population-dynamics in heterogeneous landscapes. Landsc Ecol 7:63–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson CR, Boeriijst MC (2002) Selection at the level of the community: the importance of spatial structure. Trends Ecol Evol 17:83–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King EN, Ryan TP (2002) A preliminary investigation of maximum likelihood logistic regression versus exact logistic regression. Am Stat 56:163–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler SP (2001) Rice fields as temporary wetlands: a review. Isr J Zool 47:513–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomolino MV (2000) Ecology’s most general, yet protean pattern: the species–area relationship. J Biogeogr 27:17–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Maeda T (2001) Patterns of bird abundance and habitat use in rice fields of the Kanto Plain, central Japan. Ecol Res 16:569–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maltchik L, Schneider E, Becker G, Escobar A (2003) Inventory of wetlands of Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil). Pesquisas Botânica 53: 89–100

    Google Scholar 

  • McAlpine CA, Eyre TJ (2002) Testing landscape metrics as indicators of habitat loss and fragmentation in continuous eucalypt forests (Queensland, Australia). Landsc Ecol 17:711–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcgarigal K, Marks BJ (1995) Fragstats: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. Version U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland. Gen Tech Rep PNW-GTR-351

    Google Scholar 

  • Moilanen A, Hanski I (2001) On the use of connectivity measures in spatial ecology. Oikos 95:147–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton MR, Hannon SJ, Schmiegelow FKA (2000) Fragments are not islands: patch vs landscape perspectives on songbird presence and abundance in a harvested boreal forest. Ecography 23:209–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oertli B, Joye DA, Castella E, Juge R, Cambin D, Lachavanne JB (2002) Does size matter? The relationship between pond area and biodiversity. Biol Conserv 104:59–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ovaskainen O, Hanski I (2002) Transient dynamics in metapopulation response to perturbation. Theor Popul Biol 61:285–295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pillar VDP (2000) Multiv - Multivariate exploratory analysis, randomization testing and bootstrap resampling: User’s Guide. Version 2.0. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre

    Google Scholar 

  • Plissner JH, Haig SM Oring LW (2000) Postbreeding movements of American Avocets and implications for wetland connectivity in the western Great Basin. Auk 117:290–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs RE, Lovette IJ (1999) The roles of island area per se and habitat diversity in the species-area relationships of four Lesser Antillean faunal groups. J Animal Ecol 68:1142–1160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riffell SK, Keas BE, Burton TM (2001) Area and habitat relationships of birds in Great Lakes coastal wet meadows. Wetlands 21:492–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riffell SK, Keas BE, Burton TM (2003) Birds in North American Great Lakes coastal wet meadows: is landscape context important? Landsc Ecol 18:95–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Zapata JA, Anadon JD, Carrete M, Gimenez A, Navarro J, Villacorta C, Botella F (2005) Breeding waterbirds in relation to artificial pond attributes: implications for the design of irrigation facilities. Biodivers Conserv 14:1627–1639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanzenbacher PM Haig SM (2002) Residency and movement patterns of wintering Dunlin in the Willamette Valley of Oregon. Condor 104:271–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc (2003) Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual SAS Users Group International Conference. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ, Margules CR (1991) Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation––A Review. Conserv Biol 5:18–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott D, Carbonell M (1986) Directorio de los Humedales de la Región Neotropical. International Waterfowl and Wetlands Research Bureau and International Union for the Conservation of Nature, Slimbridge and Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe DM, Stearns FW, Burgess RL, Johnson WC (1981) Spatio-temporal patterns of forest ecosystems in man-dominated landscape. In: Tjallingii SP, de Veers AA (eds). Perspectives in landscape ecology. PUDOC, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp 109–116

    Google Scholar 

  • SPSS Inc (2003) SPSS for Windows Release 12.0.1 Standard Version. Version 10.0.1 (27 Oct 1999). SPSS Inc, Chicago IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor PD, Fahrig L., Henein K., Merriam G (1993) Connectivity Is A Vital Element of Landscape Structure. Oikos 68:571–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tews J, Brose U, Grimm V, Tielborger K Wichmann MC, Schwager M, Jeltsch F (2004) Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. J Biogeogr 31:79–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tischendorf L, Fahrig L (2001) On the use of connectivity measures in spatial ecology. A reply. Oikos 95:152–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tourenq C, Bennetts RE, Kowalski H, Vialet E, Lucchesi JL, Kayser Y, Isenmann P (2001) Are ricefields a good alternative to natural marshes for waterbird communities in the Camargue, southern France? Biol Conserv 100:335–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsao M (2000) On the random placement hypothesis. Environ Ecol Stat 7:415–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Rensburg BJ, McGeoch MA, Matthews W, Chown SL, van Jaarsveld AS (2000) Testing generalities in the shape of patch occupancy frequency distributions. Ecology 81:3163–3177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villard MA, Trzcinski MK, Merriam G (1999) Fragmentation effects on forest birds: relative influence of woodland cover and configuration on landscape occupancy. Conserv Biol 13:774–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA (1995) Habitat fragmentation - Island V landscape perspectives on bird Conservation. Ibis 137:S97–S104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • With KA, Cadaret SJ, Davis C (1999) Movement responses to patch structure in experimental fractal landscapes. Ecology 80:1340–1353

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lab of Ecology and Conservation of Aquatic Ecosystems, UNISINOS, Av. Unisinos 950, Sao Leopoldo, RS, 93022-000, Brazil

    Demetrio Luis Guadagnin & Leonardo Maltchik

Authors
  1. Demetrio Luis Guadagnin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Leonardo Maltchik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Demetrio Luis Guadagnin .

Editor information

David L. Hawksworth Alan T. Bull

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Guadagnin, D.L., Maltchik, L. (2006). Habitat and landscape factors associated with neotropical waterbird occurrence and richness in wetland fragments. In: Hawksworth, D.L., Bull, A.T. (eds) Vertebrate Conservation and Biodiversity. Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6320-6_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation