Advertisement

Methodological Considerations in Developing the Timber Assessment Projection System

  • Darius M. Adams
  • Richard W. Haynes
Chapter
Part of the Managing Forest Ecosystems book series (MAFE, volume 14)

This chapter considers the major modeling issues that arise in development of a resource and market projection system. It reviews recent evolution in policy and scenario planning and forest sector market modeling. It presents a basic outline of the Timber Assessment Projection System and compares its structure to that of other contemporary modeling approaches.

Keywords

Assessment System Forest Sector Scenario Planning Timber Price Timber Supply 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abt RC, Cubbage FW, Pacheco G (2000) Southern forest resource assessment using the subregional timber supply (SRTS) model. Forest Prod J 50(4):25-33Google Scholar
  2. Adams DM, Alig RJ, Callaway JM, McCarl BA, Winnett SM (1996a) The forest and agriculture sector optimization model (FASOM): model structure and policy applications. Res Pap PNW-RP-495. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, ORGoogle Scholar
  3. Adams DM, Alig RJ, Callaway JM, McCarl BA, Winnett SM (1996b) An analysis of the impacts of public timber harvest policies on private forest management in the U.S. Forest Sci 42(3):343-358Google Scholar
  4. Adams DM, Alig RJ, McCarl BA, Callaway JM, Winnett SM (1999) Minimum cost strategies for sequestering carbon in forests. Land Econ 75(3):360-374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Adams DM, Alig RJ, McCarl BA, Winnett SM, Callaway JM (1998) The effects of factor supply assumptions on intertemporal timber supply behavior: the cases of investable funds and land. Can J Forest Res 28:239-247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Adams DM, Haynes RW (1987) Interregional modeling. In: Kallio M, Dykstra DP, Binkley CS (eds) The global forest sector: an analytical perspective. Wiley, New York, pp391-413Google Scholar
  7. Adams DM, Haynes RW (1996) The 1993 timber assessment market model: structure, projections and policy simulations. Gen Tech Rep PNW-GTR-368. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, ORGoogle Scholar
  8. Adams DM, Haynes RW (1999) Forest sector modeling: current state and promise for the future. In: Yoshimoto A, Yukutake K (eds) Global concerns for forest resource utilization, sustainable use and management. Selected papers from the international symposium of the FORESEA MIYAZAKI 1998, Forestry Sciences, vol. 62. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  9. Adams DM, Haynes RW, Dutrow GF, Barber RL, Vasievich JM (1982) Private investment in forest management and the long-term supply of timber. Am J Agr Econ 64(2):232-241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Adams DM, Latta GS (2005) Costs and regional impacts of restoration thinning programs on the national forests in Eastern Oregon. Can J Forest Res 35 (6):1319-1330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Adams DM, Latta GS (2007) Timber trends on private lands in Western Oregon and Washington: a new look. West J Appl For 22(1):8-14Google Scholar
  12. Adams DM, Mills JR, Alig RJ, Haynes RW (2005) SOFRA and RPA: two views of the future of Southern timber supply. South J Appl For 29(3):123-134Google Scholar
  13. Alig RJ, Adams DM, Haynes RW (1983) Long-range projections of forest area change: new approaches are needed. J Forest 81(11):723-727 as T (2005) A model for regional analysis of carbon sequestration and timber production. Forest Ecol Manag 216(2005):28-40Google Scholar
  14. Beach R, Pattanayak S, Yang J-C, Murray B, Abt R (2005) Econometric studies of non-industrial private forest management a review and synthesis. Forest Policy Econ 7(2005):261-281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Berck P (1979) The economics of timber: a renewable resource in the long run. Bell J Econ 10:447-462 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bernard J-T, Bouthillier L, Catimel J, Gelinas N (1997) An integrated model of Quebec-Ontario-U.S. northeast softwood lumber markets. Am J Agr Econ 79 (8):987-1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Binkley CS, Cardellichio PA (1983) Modeling the hardwood sector: issues and prospects. In: Seppälä R, Row C, Morgan A (eds) Forest sector models. AB Academic Press, Berkhamsted, UKGoogle Scholar
  18. Bolkesjø T, Trombørg E, Solberg B (2005) Increasing forest conservation in Norway: consequences for timber and forest products markets. Environ Resour Econ 31:95-115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Buongiorno J, Zhu S, Zhang D, Turner J, Tomberlin D (2003) The global forest products model: structure, estimation, and applications. Academic Press, San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
  20. Cardellichio PA, Youn Y-C, Adams DM, Joo R-W, Chmelik J (1989) A preliminary analysis of timber and timber products production, consumption, trade, and prices in the Pacific Rim until 2000. Work Pap WP-22. CINTRAFOR, University of Washington, College of Forest Resources, Seattle, WAGoogle Scholar
  21. Chambers RG (1988) Applied production analysis: a dual approach. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Day RH (1973) Recursive programming models: a brief introduction. In: Judge GG, Takayama T (eds) Studies in economic planning over space and time: contribution to economic analysis. Elsevier, New York, pp329-344Google Scholar
  23. Gallopin GC (2002) Planning for resilience: scenarios, surprises, and branch points. In: Gunderson LH, Holling CS (eds) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington DC, pp316-392Google Scholar
  24. Haynes RW, Adams DM (1979) Impacts of RARE II withdrawals on softwood prices, consumption, and production. J Forest 78(4):230-233Google Scholar
  25. Haynes RW, Adams DM (1983) Changing perceptions of the U.S. forest sector: implications for the RPA Timber Assessment. Am J Agr Econ 63(5):1002-1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haynes RW, Graham RT, Quiqley TM (1996) A framework for ecosystem management in the interior Columbia Basin. Gen Tech Rep PNW-GTR-374. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, ORGoogle Scholar
  27. Johansen PO, Löfgren KG (1985) The economics of forestry and natural resources. Basil Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnson KN, Scheurman HL (1977) Techniques for prescribing optimal timber harvests and investment under different objectives. Forest Sci Mono 18Google Scholar
  29. Kallio AMI, Moiseyev A, Solberg B (2004) The global forest sector model EFIGTM—the model structure. Internal Rep No. 15. European Forest Institute, Joensuu, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  30. Kallio M, Dykstra DP, Binkley CS (1987) The global forest sector: an analytical perspective. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Labys WC (1973) Dynamic commodity models: specification, estimation, and simulation. Lexington Books, DC Health, Lexington, MAGoogle Scholar
  32. Lönnstedt L (1986) A dynamic forest sector model with a Swedish case. Forest Sci 32(2):377-397Google Scholar
  33. Manurung E, Buongiorno J (1997) Effects of the ban on tropical log exports on the forestry sector of Indonesia. J World Forest Resour Manag 8:21-49Google Scholar
  34. McKillop WL, Adams DM, Haynes RW (1981) National impacts of softwood product price increases. J Forest 79(12):807-810 Google Scholar
  35. Mills JR, Kincaid JC (1992) The aggregate timberland assessment system— ATLAS: a comprehensive timber projection model. Gen Tech Rep PNW-GTR281. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, ORGoogle Scholar
  36. Montgomery C, Brown G Jr, Adams DM (1994) The marginal cost of species preservation: the northern spotted owl. J Environ Econ Manag 26:111-128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Naylor TH (ed) (1969) The design of computer simulation experiments. Duke University Press, Durham, NCGoogle Scholar
  38. Naylor TH (1972) Policy simulation experiments with macro-econometric models: the state of the art. Am J Agr Econ 52:263-271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Önal H, McCarl BA, Griffin WL, Matlock G, Clark J (1991) A bioeconomic analy- sis of the Texas shrimp fishery and its optimal management. Am J Agr Econ 73(4):1161-1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Prestemon JP, Abt RC (2002) Timber products supply and demand. In: Wear DN, Greis JG (eds) Southern forest resource assessment. Gen Tech Rep SRS-GTR- 53. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station. Asheville, NC, pp299-325Google Scholar
  41. Schwarzbauer P (1992) Potential impacts of forest decline on the Austrian forest products markets—an analysis using a forest sector simulation model. In: Adams DM, Haynes RW, Lippke B, Perez-Garcia J (compilers) Forest sector, trade and environmental impact models: theory and applications; proceedings of an international symposium 30 April-1 May 1992. CINTRAFOR, University of Washington, College of Forest Resources, Seattle, WA, pp205-211Google Scholar
  42. Sedjo R, Lyon K (1990) The long-term adequacy of world timber supply. Resources for the Future, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  43. Sohngen B, Mendelsohn R (1998) Valuing the impact of large sale ecological change in a market: the effect of climate change on US timber. Am Econ Rev 88(4): 686-710Google Scholar
  44. Sohngen B, Mendelsohn R, Sedjo R (1999) Forest management, conservation, and global timber markets. Am J Agr Econ 81(1):1-13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sohngen B, Sedjo R (1998) A comparison of timber market models: static simulation and optimal control approaches. Forest Sci 44(1):24-26Google Scholar
  46. Spelter H (1984) Price elasticities for softwood plywood and structural particleboard in the United States. Can J Forest Res 14:528-535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Spelter H (1985) A product diffusion approach to modeling softwood lumber demand. Forest Sci 31(3):685-700Google Scholar
  48. Spelter H (1992) Technology-driven substitution in the forest sector: the variable price elasticity model revisited. In: Lönnstedt L (ed) Forest sector analysis, proceeding of P06.02 FORESEA, IUFRO Centennial 30, Berlin, August-4 September 1992. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SIMS (ForestIndustry-Market Studies), Uppsala, Sweden, pp24-29Google Scholar
  49. Stavins RN (1999) The costs of carbon sequestration: a revealed-preference approach. Am Econ Rev 89(4):994-1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tachibana S (2000) Impacts of the environmental conservation movements in North America on the Japanese softwood timber markets: an econometric analysis. Studies for Regional Policy 3(2):35-50Google Scholar
  51. Tachibana S, Nagata S (1999) Impacts of South-East Asian log export ban policies on Japanese plywood market. In: Yoshimoto A, Yukutake K (eds) Global concerns for forest resource utilization sustainable use and management, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp275-286Google Scholar
  52. Thomas JW, Forsman Ed, Lint JB, Meslow EC, Noon BR, Verner J (1990) A Conservation strategy for the northern spotted owl. Interagency Scientific Committee to Address the Conservation of the Northern Spotted Owl. Committee established by interagency agreement between USDA Forest Service, USDI Bureau of Land Management, USDI Fish and Wildlife Service, and USDI National Park ServiceGoogle Scholar
  53. Vaux HJ, Zivnuska JA (1952) Forest production goals: a critical analysis. Land Econ 28(4):318-327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wack P (1985) Scenarios: uncharted waters ahead. Harvard Bus Rev 63(5):72-89Google Scholar
  55. Wear DN (2002) Land use. In: Wear DN, Greis JG (eds) Southern forest resource assessment. Gen Tech Rep SRS-GTR-53. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC, pp153-173Google Scholar
  56. Wear DN, Greis JG (eds) (2002) Southern forest resource assessment. Gen Tech Rep SRS-GTR-53. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, NCGoogle Scholar
  57. Wear DN, Murray BC (2003) Federal timber restrictions, interregional spillovers, and the impact on US softwood markets. J Environ Econ Manag 47(2):307-330Google Scholar
  58. Yoshimoto A, Yukutake K (2002) Japanese forest sector modeling through a partial equilibrium market model. J For Res-Jpn 7:41-48Google Scholar
  59. Zhang D, Buongiorno J, Ince P (1993) PELPS III: a microcomputer price endogenous liner programming system for economic modeling, version 1.0. Res Pap RP-FPL-526. USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WIGoogle Scholar
  60. Zhang D, Buongiorno J, Ince P (1996) A recursive linear programming analysis of the future of the pulp and paper industry in the United States: changes in supplies and demands, and the effects of recycling. Ann Oper Res 68:109-139CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Darius M. Adams
    • 1
  • Richard W. Haynes
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Forest ResourcesOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  2. 2.USDA Forest ServicePacific Northwest Research StationPortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations