Skip to main content

A New-Growth Perspective on Non-Renewable Resources

  • Chapter
Sustainable Resource Use and Economic Dynamics

Part of the book series: The Economics Of Non-Market Goods And Resources ((ENGO,volume 10))

Key words: Endogenous growth, innovation, non-renewable resources, knife-edge conditions, robustness, limits to growth. The aim of this article is to review issues related to the incorporation of scarce natural resources in the theory of economic growth and development. More specifically, we shall concentrate on the role of non-renewable resources. A nonrenewable resource is a natural resource the amount of which on earth is finite and which has no natural regeneration process (at least not within a relevant time scale). Hence, the stock of a non-renewable resource is depletable. Fossil fuels as well as many non-energy minerals are examples. A renewable resource is also available only in limited supply, but its stock is replenished by a natural regeneration process. Hence, if the stock of a renewable resource is not over-exploited, it can be sustained in a more or less constant amount. Fertile soil, fish in the sea, and environmental qualities (clean air etc.) would be examples. In this article the focus is on the specific features of non-renewable resources in relation to the feasibility of sustained economic growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Acemoglu, D. (2003), ‘Labour- and Capital-augmenting Technical Change, Journal of the European Economic Association 1, 1-37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aghion, P. and R. Griffith (2005), Competition and Growth. Reconciling Theory and Evidence, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aghion, P. and P. Howitt (1992), ‘A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction’, Econometrica 60,323-351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aghion, P. and P. Howitt (1998), Endogenous Growth Theory, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcalá , F. and A. Ciccone (2004), ‘Trade and Productivity’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 119, 613-646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • André , F.J. and S.Smulders (2004), ‘Energy Use, Endogenous Technical Change and Economic Growth’, Working paper, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antweiler, W. and D. Trefler (2002), ‘Increasing Returns and All That: A View from Trade’, American Economic Review 92, 93-119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1962a), ‘Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention’, in The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, ed. by R. R. Nelson, Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1962b), ‘The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing’, Review of Economic Studies, 29, 153-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attanasio, O. and G. Weber (1995), ‘Is Consumption Growth Consistent with Intertemporal Opti-mization?’ Journal of Political Economy 103, 1121-1157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J. and X. Sala-i-Martin (2004), Economic Growth, 2nd edn. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretschger, L. and S. Smulders (2006), ‘Sustainability and Substitution of Exhaustible Natural Resources. How Resource Prices Affect Long-term R&D-investments, Economics Working Paper Series 03/26, rev. version May 2006, ETH Z ürich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, W. A. and M. S. Taylor (2005), ‘Economic Growth and the Environment: A Review of Theory and Empirics’, in Handbook of Economic Growth, Vol. 1B, P. Aghion and S. N. Durlauf, eds. pp.1749-1821. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caballero, R. J. and R. K. Lyons (1992), The Case of External Economies, in Political Economy, Growth, and Business Cycles, A. Cukierman, Z. Hercowitz and L. Leiderman eds. pp. 117-139, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cass, D. and T. Mitra (1991), ‘Indefinitely Sustained Consumption Despite Exhaustible Resources, Economic Theory 1 (2), 119-146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiarella, C. (1980), ‘Optimal Depletion of a Nonrenewable Resource when Technological Progress is Endogenous’, in Exhaustible Resources, Optimality, and Trade, M. C. Kemp and N. V. Long, eds., North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chichilnisky, G., G. M. Heal, and A. Vercelli, eds., (1998), Sustainability: Dynamics and Uncer-tainty. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cozzi, G. (1997), ‘Exploring Growth Trajectories’, Journal of Economic Growth 2, 385-398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. (1993), Natural Resources in an Age of Substitutability’, in A. V. Kneese and J. L. Sweeney, eds., Handbook of Natural Resource and Energy Economics, Vol. 3, pp. 1111-1130. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. and G. M. Heal (1974), ‘The Optimal Depletion of Exhaustible Resources’, Review of Economic Studies 41, Symposium, 3-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P., and G. M. Heal (1979), Economic Theory and Exhaustible Resources. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P., G. M. Heal, and M. K. Majumdar (1977), ‘Resource Depletion and Research and Development’, in M. D. Intrilligator ed., Frontiers of Quantitative Economics, Vol. IIIB, 483-505, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P., G. M. Heal, and A. K. Pand (1980), Funding Research and Development, Applied Mathematical Modeling 4, 87-94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Maria, C. and S. Valente (2006), ‘The Direction of Technical Change in Capital-resource Economies, Economics Working Paper Series 06/50, ETH Z ürich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinopoulos, E. and P. Thompson (1998), ‘Schumpeterian Growth without Scale Effects’, Journal of Economic Growth 3, 313-335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. K. (1976), The Theory of Equilibrium Growth, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, P. (1996), Using Cross-country Variances to Evaluate Growth Theories’, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 20, 1027-1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farzin, Y. H. and O. Tahvonen (1996), ‘Global Carbon Cycle and the Optimal Time Path of a Carbon Tax, Oxford Economic Papers 48, 515-536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton, D. and S.-R. Kim (2006), ‘Environmental Investment and Policy with Distortionary Taxes and Endogenous Growth’, NBER WP 12070.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimaud, A. and L. Rougé (2003), ‘Non-renewable Resources and Growth with Vertical Innova-tions: Optimum, Equilibrium and Economic Policies, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45, 433-453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G. M. and E. Helpman (1991), Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groth, C.(2004),‘Strictly Endogenous Growth with Non-renewable Resources Implies an Unbounded Growth Rate, Topics in Macroeconomics 4 (1), 1-13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groth, C. (2005), ‘Growth and Non-renewable Resources Revisited, Working paper, University of Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groth, C. (2006), ‘Capital and Resource Taxation in a Romer-style Growth Model with Non-renewable Resources, Working paper, University of Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groth, C. and P. Schou (2002), ‘Can Nonrenewable Resources Alleviate the Knife-edge Character of Endogenous Growth?”, Oxford Economic Papers 54, 386-411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groth, C., and P. Schou (2006), ‘Growth and Non-renewable Resources: The Different Roles of Cap-ital and Resource Taxes, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groth, C., K.-J. Koch, and T. Steger (2006), ‘Rethinking the Concept of Long-run Economic Growth’, CESifo Working Paper no. 1701, Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. E.(1990),‘Invariance Properties of Solow’s Residual’, in P. Diamond, ed., Growth/Productivity/Un-employment. Essays to Celebrate Bob Solow’s Birthday, pp. 71-112. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartwick, J. M. (1977), Intergenerational Equity and the Investing of Rents from Exhaustible Resources, American Economic Review 67, 972-974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heal, G. M. (1998), Valuing the Future. Economic Theory and Sustainability. New York. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling, H. (1931), ‘The Economics of Exhaustible Resources’, Journal of Political Economy 39, 137-175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howitt, P. (1999), ‘Steady Endogenous Growth with Population and R&D Inputs Growing’, Journal of Political Economy 107, 715-730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. I. (1995a), ‘Time-series Tests of Endogenous Growth Models’, Quarterly Journal of Eco-nomics 110, 495-525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. I. (1995b), ‘R&D-based Models of Economic Growth’, Journal of Political Economy 103, 759-784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. I. (1999), ‘Growth: With or without scale effects?’, American Economic Review 89, May, 139-144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. I. (2002a), ‘Sources of U.S. Economic Growth in a World of Ideas’, American Economic Review 92, 220-239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. I. (2002b), Introduction to Economic Growth, 2nd edn. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. I. (2003), ‘Population and Ideas: A theory of Endogenous Growth, in P. Aghion, R. Frydman, J. Stiglitz, and M. Woodford, Knowledge, Information, and Expectations in Modern Macroeconomics: In Honor of Edmund S. Phelps, pp. 498-521, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. I. (2005), ‘The Shape of Production Functions and the Direction of Technical Change’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 120 (2), 517-549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. I. and D. Scrimgeour (2005), ‘The Steady-state Growth Theorem: Understanding Uzawa (1961)’, working paper, Berkeley, University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L. E. and R. E. Manuelli (1997), ‘The Sources of Growth’, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 21, 75-114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jovanovic, B. (1997), ‘Learning and Growth’, in D. M. Kreps and K. F. Wallis, eds., Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications, Vol. II, pp.318-339, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Just, R. E., S. Netanyahu, and L. J. Olsen (2005), ‘Depletion of Natural Resources, Technological Uncertainty, and the Adoption of Technological Substitutes’, Resource and Energy Economics 27,91-108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamien, M. I. and N. L. Schwartz (1978), ‘Optimal Exhaustible Resource Depletion with Endoge-nous Technical Change’, Review of Economic Studies 45 (1), 179-196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kortum, S. (1997), ‘Research, Patenting, and Technological Change’, Econometrica 65, 1389-1419. Krautkraemer, J. (1985), ‘Optimal Growth, Resource Amenities and the Preservation of Natural Environments’, Review of Economic Studies 52, 153-170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krautkraemer, J. (1998), ‘Nonrenewable Resource Scarcity’, Journal of Economic Literature 36 (4), 2065-2107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremer, M. (1993), Population Growth and Technological Change: One million B.C. to 1990, Quar-terly Journal of Economics 108, 681-716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, C.-W. (2000), ‘Endogenous vs. Semi-endogenous Growth in a Two-sector Model’, Economic Journal 110, C109-C122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, C.-W. (2002a), ‘Growth and Scale Effects: The Role of Knowledge Spillovers’, Economics Letters 74, 177-185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, D. (2002b), ‘Is the AK Model Still Alive? The Long-run Relation Between Growth and Invest-ment Re-examined, Canadian Journal of Economics 35 (1), 92-114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E., Jr. (1988), ‘On the Mechanics of Economic Development, Journal of Monetary Eco-nomics 22, 3-42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw, N. G. (1995), ‘The Growth of Nations’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, (1), 275-326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, D. H. et al. (1972), The Limits to Growth. New York: Universe Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, D. H., D. L. Meadows, and J. Randers (1992), Beyond the Limits. Post Mills: Chelsea Green Publ. Com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer, E. (2000), ‘Scarce or Abundant? The Economics of Natural Resource Availability’, Jour-nal of Economic Surveys 14 (3), 307-335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W. (1969), ‘An Economic Theory of Technological Change’, American Economic Review 59(2),18-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W. (1992), ‘Lethal Model 2: The Limits to Growth Revisited’, Brookings Papers on Eco-nomic Activities, (2), 1-43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W. and J. Tobin (1972), ‘Is growth obsolete?’ in: Economic Growth: Fiftieth Anniver-sary Colloquium V. New York: Columbia University Press. Reprinted in J. Tobin, Essays in Economics. Theory and Policy 1985, pp.360-450. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peretto, P. (1998), ‘Technological Change and Population Growth’, Journal of Economic Growth 3 (4),283-311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peretto, P. and S. Smulders (2002), Technological Distance, Growth and Scale Effects, Economic Journal 112, 603-624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popp, D. (2002), Induced Innovation and Energy Prices, American Economic Review 92 (1), 160-180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F. (1928), ‘A Mathematical Theory of Saving’, Economic Journal 38, 543-559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebelo, S. (1991), ‘Long-run Policy Analysis and Long-run Growth’, Journal of Political Economy 99,500-521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robson, A. J. (1980), ‘Costly Innovation and Natural Resources’, International Economic Review 21,17-30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. M. (1986), ‘Increasing Returns and Long-run Growth’, Journal of Political Economy 94, 1002-1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. M. (1987), ‘Growth Based on Increasing Returns due to Specialization’, American Eco-nomic Review 77, May, 56-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. M. (1990), ‘Endogenous Technical Change’, Journal of Political Economy 98 (Suppl.), 71-102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. M. (1995), ‘Comment to Srinivasan’, in T. Ito and A. O.Krueger eds., Growth Theories in the Light of the East Asian Experience, pp. 66-70, Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero-Avila, D. (2006), ‘Can the AK Model be Rescued? New Evidence from Unit Root Tests with Good Size and Power’, Topics in Macroeconomics 6 (1), 0-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, C. M. and G. Ziemes (1999) ‘Exhaustible Resources, Monopolistic Competition, and Endogenous Growth’, Environmental and Resource Economics 13, 169-185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schou, P. (2000), ‘Polluting Nonrenewable Resources and Growth’, Environmental and Resource Economics 16, 211-27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schou, P. (2002), ‘When Environmental Policy is Superfluous: Growth and Polluting Resources’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics 104, 605-620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segerstrom, P. (1998), ‘Endogenous Growth Without Scale Effects’, American Economic Review 88,1290-1310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seierstad, A. and K. Sydsaeter (1987), Optimal Control Theory with Economic Applications, Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shell, K.(1973),‘Inventive Activity, Industrial Organization and Economic Growth’, in J. A. Mirrlees and N. H. Stern, eds., Models of Economic Growth. pp. 77-96, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, P. (1994), On the Optimum Trend of Fossil Fuel Taxation, Oxford Economic Papers 46, 869-877.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smil, V. (1994), Energy in World History. Boulder Co: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smil, V. (2003), Energy at the Crossroads. Global Perspectives and Uncertainties. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smulders, S. and M. de Nooij (2003), ‘The Impact of Energy Conservation on Technology and Economic Growth’, Resource and Energy Economics 25, 59-79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R. M. (1974a), ‘Intergenerational Equity and Exhaustible Resources’, Review of Economic Studies 41, Symposium Issue, 29-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R. M. (1974b), ‘The Economics of Resources or the Resources of Economics’, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 64, 1-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R. M. (1994), ‘Perspectives on Growth Theory’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 8, 45-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. (1974a), Growth with Exhaustible Natural Resources: Efficient and Optimal Growth paths, Review of Economic Studies Symposium Issue, 41, 123-137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. (1974b), ‘Growth with Exhaustible Natural Resources: The Competitive Economy’, Review of Economic Studies Symposium Issue, 41, 139-152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, H. (1976), On the Possibility of Steadily Growing Per Capita Consumption in an Economy With a Wasting and Non-replenishable Resource’, Review of Economic Studies 43, 527-535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tahvonen, O. and S. Salo (2001), ‘Economic Growth and Transitions between Renewable and Non-renewable Energy Resources’, European Economic Review 45, 1379-1398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takayama, A. (1980), ‘Optimal Technical Progress with Exhaustible Resources’, in M. C. Kemp and N.V.Long eds., Exhaustible Resources, Optimality, and Trade, pp.95-110, Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2005), World Population Prospects. The 2004 Revision, Population Division, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzawa, H. (1961), ‘Neutral Inventions and the Stability of Growth Equilibrium’, Review of Eco-nomic Studies 28 (2), 117-124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, A. (1998), ‘Growth Without Scale Effects’, American Economic Review 88, 41-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, M. L. (1998a), ‘Recombinant Growth’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 113, 331-360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, M. L. (1998b), ‘Why the Far-distant Future Should be Discounted at its Lowest Possible Rate’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36, 201-208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, M. L. (2001), ‘Gamma Discounting’, American Economic Review 91 (1), 260-271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Withagen, C. (1990), ‘Topics in Resource Economics’, in F. van der Ploeg, ed., Advanced Lectures in Quantitative Economics, pp. 381-419. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Groth, C. (2007). A New-Growth Perspective on Non-Renewable Resources. In: Bretschger, L., Smulders, S. (eds) Sustainable Resource Use and Economic Dynamics. The Economics Of Non-Market Goods And Resources, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6293-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics