Micro and Nano Systems in Biomedicine and Drug Delivery

  • Nesrin Hasirci


Micro and nano sytems sysnthesized from organic and inorganic materials are gaining great attention in biomedical applications such as design of biosensors, construction of imaging systems, synthesis of drug carrying and drug targeting devices, etc. Emulsions, suspensions, micelles, liposomes, dendrimers, polymeric and responsive systems are some examples for drug carrier devices. They have lots of advantages over conventional systems since they enhance the delivery, extend the bioactivity of the drug by protecting them from environmental effects in biological media, show minimal side effects, demonstrate high performance characteristics, and are more economical since minimum amount of expensive drugs are used. This chapter provides brief information about micro and nano systems used in biomedicine, nanobiotechnology and drug delivery


micelles liposomes dendrimers drug carriers responsive polymers 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Akin H and Hasirci N, Preparation and characterization of crosslinked gelatin microspheres, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 58, 95–100, 1995.Google Scholar
  2. Akin H and Hasirci N, Thermal properties of crosslinked gelatin microspheres, Polymer Preprints, 36, 384–385, 1995.Google Scholar
  3. Akin H and Hasirci N, Effect of loading on the release of 2,4-D from polymeric microspheres, Polymer Preprints, 35, 765–766, 1994.Google Scholar
  4. Akin H, Hasirci V N and Hasirci N, Permeability properties of charged hydrogel carrying membranes, Polymer, 31, 270–276, 1990.Google Scholar
  5. Aliabadi H M, Brocks D R and Lavasanifar A, Polymeric micelles for the solubilization and delivery of cyclosporine A: pharmacokinetics and biodistribution, Biomaterials, 26, 7251–7259, 2005a.Google Scholar
  6. Aliabadi H M, Mahmud A, Sharifabadi D A and Lavasanifar A, Micelles of methoxy poly (ethylene oxide)-b-poly (ε-caprolactone) as vehicles for the solubilization and controlled delivery of cyclosporine A, Journal of Controlled Release, 104, 301–311, 2005b.Google Scholar
  7. Alonso M J, Nanomedicines for overcoming biological barriers, Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy, 58, 168–172, 2004.Google Scholar
  8. Alonso B, Armada P G, Losada J, Cuadrado I, Gonzalez B and Casado C M, Amperometric enzyme electrodes for aerobic and anaerobic glucose monitoring prepared by glucose oxidase immobilized in mixed ferrocene–cobaltocenium dendrimers, Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 19, 1617–1625, 2004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Amaral M, Lopes M A, Santos J D and Silva R F, Wettability and surface charge of Si3N4–bioglass composites in contact with simulated physiological liquids, Biomaterials, 23, 4123–4129, 2002.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Arcon I, Kodre A, Abra R M, Huang A, Vallner J J and Lasic D D, EXAFS study of liposome-encapsulated cisplatin, Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 33, 199–204, 2004.Google Scholar
  11. Boguslavsky L, Baruch S and Margel S, Synthesis and characterization of polyacrylonitrile nanoparticles by dispersion/emulsion polymerization process, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 289, 71–85, 2005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Burke A, Yilmaz E and Hasirci N, Evaluation of chitosan as a potential medical iron (III) ion adsorbant, Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 30, 341–348, 2000.Google Scholar
  13. Burke A, Yilmaz E and Hasirci N, Iron (III)-ion removal from solution through adsorption on chitosan, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 84, 1185–1192, 2002.Google Scholar
  14. Cammas S, Suzuki K, Sone C, Sakurai Y, Kataoka K and Okano T, Thermo-responsive polymer nanoparticles with a core-shell micelle structure as site-specific drug carriers, Journal of Controlled Release, 48, 157–164, 1997.Google Scholar
  15. Carrara S, Bavastrello V, Ricci D, Stura E and Nicolini C, Improved nanocomposite materials for biosensor applications investigated by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 109, 221–226, 2005.Google Scholar
  16. Carrillo A and Kane R S, Block copolymer nanoparticles of controlled size via ring opening-metathesis polymerization, Journal of Polymer Science Part A-Polymer Chemistry, 13, 3352–3359, 2004.Google Scholar
  17. Chen C W, Takezako T, Yamamoto K, Serizawa T and Akashi M, Poly (N-vinylisobutyramide)-stabilized platinum nanoparticles: synthesis and temperature-responsive behavior in aqueous solution, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 169, 107–116, 2000.Google Scholar
  18. Chen L and Subirade M, Chitosan/I-lactoglobulin core-shell nanoparticles as nutraceutical carriers, Biomaterials, 26, 6041–6053, 2005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Chilkoti A, Dreher M R and Meyer D E, Design of thermally responsive, recombinant polypeptide carriers for targeted drug delivery, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 54, 1093–1111, 2002.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Choi Y, Thomas T, Kotlyar A, Islam M T and Baker J R, Synthesis and functional evaluation of DNA-assembled polyamidoamine dendrimer clusters for cancer cell-specific targeting, Chemistry and Biology, 12, 35–43, 2005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Christel P A, Klein T, Abe Y, Hosono H and Groot K, Different calcium phosphate bioglass ceramics implanted in rabbit cortical bone, Biomaterials, 5, 362–364, 1984.Google Scholar
  22. Ciardelli G and Cioni B, Acrylic polymeric nanospheres for the release and recognition of molecules of clinical interest, Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 20, 1083–1090, 2004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Cirli O O and Hasirci V, UV-induced drug release from photoactive REV sensitized by suprofen, Journal of Controlled Release, 96, 85–96, 2004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Determan M D, Cox J P, Seifert S, Thiyagarajan P and Mallapragada S K, Synthesis and characterization of temperature and pH-responsive pentablock copolymers, Polymer, 46, 6933–6946, 2005.Google Scholar
  25. Devarakonda B, Hill R A and Villiers M M, The effect of PAMAM dendrimer generation size and surface functional group on the aqueous solubility of nifedipine, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 284, 133–140, 2004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Dinauer N, Balthasar S, Weber C, Kreuter J, Langer K and von Briesen H, Selective targeting of antibody-conjugated nanoparticles to leukemic cells and primary T-lymphocytes, Biomaterials, 26, 5898–5906, 2005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Dinauer N, Lochmann D, Demirhan I, Bouazzaoui A, Zimmer A, Chandra A, Kreuter J and Briesen H, Intracellular tracking of protamine/antisense oligonucleotide nanoparticles and their inhibitory effect on HIV-1 transactivation, Journal of Controlled Release, 96, 497–507, 2004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Domanski D M, Klajnert B and Bryszewska M, Influence of PAMAM dendrimers on human red blood cells, Bioelectrochemistry, 63, 189–191, 2004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Dong L C and Hoffman A S, Synthesis and application of thermally reversible heterogels for drug delivery, Journal of Controlled Release, 13, 21–31, 1990.Google Scholar
  30. Dong Y and Feng S S, Poly (d,l-lactide-co-glycolide)/montmorillonite nanoparticles for oral delivery of anticancer drugs, Biomaterials, 26, 6068–6076, 2005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Du D, Liu S, Chen J, Ju H, Lian H and Li J, Colloidal gold nanoparticle modified carbon paste interface for studies of tumor cell adhesion and viability, Biomaterials, 26, 6487–6495, 2005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. El Maghraby G M M, Williams A C and Barry B W, Interactions of surfactants (edge activators) and skin penetration enhancers with liposomes, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 276, 143–161, 2004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Florence A T, Sakthivel T and Toth I, Oral uptake and translocation of a polylysine dendrimer with a lipid surface, Journal of Controlled Release, 65, 253–259, 2000.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Foco A, Gasperlin M and Kristl J, Investigation of liposomes as carriers of sodium ascorbyl phosphate for cutaneous photoprotection, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 291, 21–29, 2005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Fuentes P, Cooper P D, Barnadas R, Sabes M, Osterhoff C and Martinez P, Use of γ-inulin/ liposomes/Vitamin E adjuvant combination in contraceptive vaccines, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 257, 85–95, 2003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Goldraich M and Kost J, Glucose-sensitive polymeric matrices for controlled drug delivery, Clinical Materials, 13, 135–142, 1993.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Gomez-Lopera S A, Plaza R C and Delgado A V, Synthesis and Characterization of Spherical Magnetite/Biodegradable Polymer Composite Particles, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 240, 40–47, 2001.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Guler F, Bingol-Kologlu M, Yagmurlu A, Guven C, Hasirci N, Kucuk O, Aytac S and Dindar H, The effects of local and sustained release of fibroblast growth factor on testicular blood flow and morphology in spermatic artery and vein-ligated rats, Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 39, 709–716, 2004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. He Y, Interfacial synthesis and characterization of polyaniline nanofibers, Materials Science and Engineering B, 122, 76–79, 2005.Google Scholar
  40. He Y, A novel emulsion route to sub-micrometer polyaniline/nano-ZnO composite fibers, Applied Surface Science, 249, 1–6, 2005.Google Scholar
  41. Ito A, Hibino E, Honda H, Hata K, Kagami H, Ueda M and Kobayashi T, A new methodology of mesenchymal stem cell expansion using magnetic nanoparticles, Biochemical Engineering Journal, 20, 119–125, 2004.Google Scholar
  42. Ito A, Ino K, Kobayashi T and Honda H, The effect of RGD peptide-conjugated magnetite cationic liposomes on cell growth and cell sheet harvesting, Biomaterials, 26, 6185–6193, 2005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Jevprasesphant R, Penny J, Attwood D and D’Emanuele A, Transport of dendrimer nanocarriers through epithelial cells via the transcellular route, Journal of Controlled Release, 97, 259–267, 2004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Jo Y S, Kim M C and Kim D K, Mathematical modelling on the controlled release of indomethacin “encapsulated poly(lactic acid-co-etylene oxide) nanospheres”, Nanotechnology, 15, 1186–1194, 2004.Google Scholar
  45. Kabra B G, Akhtar M K and Gehrke S H, Volume change kinetics of temperature-sensitive poly (vinyl methyl ether) gel, Polymer, 33, 990–995, 1992.Google Scholar
  46. Kang N and Leroux J C, Triblock and star-block copolymers of N-(2-hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide or N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone and D,L-lactide: synthesis and self-assembling properties in water, Polymer, 45, 8967–8980, 2004.Google Scholar
  47. Kataoka K, Matsumoto T, Yokoyama M, Okano T, Sakurai Y, Fukushima S, Okamoto K and Kwon G S, Doxorubicin-loaded poly(ethylene glycol)- poly(beta-benzyl-L-aspartate) copolymer micelles: their pharmaceutical characteristics and biological significance, Journal of Controlled Release, 64, 143–153, 2000.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Kim S Y, Ha J C and Lee Y M, Poly(ethylene oxide) -poly(propylene oxide)- poly(ethylene oxide)/poly (-caprolactone) (PCL) amphiphilic block copolymeric nanospheres II. Thermo-responsive drug release behaviors, Journal of Controlled Release, 65, 345–358, 2000.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Kolhe P, Misra E, Kannan R M, Kannan S and Lieh-Lai M, Drug complexation, in vitro release and cellular entry of dendrimers and hyperbranched polymers, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 259, 143–160, 2003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Konno T, Kurita K, Iwasaki Y, Nakabayashi N and Ishihara K, Preparation of nanoparticles composed with bioinspired 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine polymer, Biomaterials, 22, 1883–1889, 2001.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Koo O M, Rubinstein I and Onyuksel H, Camptothecin in sterically stabilized phospholipid micelles: A novel nanomedicine, Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine, 1, 77–84, 2005.Google Scholar
  52. Kovacs J R, Zheng Y, Shen H and Meng W S, Polymeric microspheres as stabilizing anchors for oligonucleotide delivery to dendritic cells, Biomaterials, 26, 6754–6761, 2005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Koynova R and MacDonald R C, Lipid transfer between cationic vesicles and lipid–DNA lipoplexes: Effect of serum, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) – Biomembranes, 1714, 63–70, 2005.Google Scholar
  54. Kunisawa J, Masuda T, Katayama K, Yoshikawa T, Tsutsumi Y, Akashi M, Mayumi T and Nakagawa S, Fusogenic liposome delivers encapsulated nanoparticles for cytosolic controlled gene release, Journal of Controlled Release, 105, 344–353, 2005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Lee H K, Jeong E H, Baek C K and Youk J H, One-step preparation of ultrafine poly(acrylonitrile) fibers containing silver nanoparticles, Materials Letters, 59, 2977–2980, 2005.Google Scholar
  56. Leibiger B, Leibiger I, Sarrach D and Zuhlke H, Expression of exogenous DNA in rat liver cells after liposome-mediated transfection in vivo, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 174, 1223–1231, 1991.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Leroux J C, Roux E, Garrec D L, Hong K and Drummond D C, N-isopropylacrylamide copolymers for the preparation of pH-sensitive liposomes and polymeric micelles, Journal of Controlled Release, 72, 71–84, 2001.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Lin F H, Yao C H, Huang C W, Liu H C, Sun J S and Wang C Y, The bonding behavior of DP-bioglass and bone tissue, Materials Chemistry and Physics, 46, 36–42, 1996.Google Scholar
  59. Liu X M, Yang Y Y and Leong K W, Thermally responsive polymeric micellar nanoparticles self-assembled from cholesteryl end-capped random poly(N-isopropyl acrylamide-co-N,N-dimethylacrylamide): synthesis, temperature-sensitivity, and morphologies, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 266, 295–303, 2003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Lopes L B, Scarpa M V, Silva G V J, Rodrigues D C, Santilli C V and Oliveira A G, Studies on the encapsulation of diclofenac in small unilamellar liposomes of soya phosphatidylcholine, Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 39, 151–158, 2004.Google Scholar
  61. Lopez-Pinto J M, Gonzalez-Rodriguez M L and Rabasco A M, Effect of cholesterol and ethanol on dermal delivery from DPPC liposomes, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 298, 1–12, 2005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Low L M, Seetharaman S, He K Q and Madou M J, Microactuators toward microvalves for responsive controlled drug delivery, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 67, 149–16 2000.Google Scholar
  63. Mamede M, Saga T, Ishimori T, Higashi T, Sato N, Kobayashi H, Brechbiel M W and Konishi J, Hepatocyte targeting of 111In-labeled oligo-DNA with avidin or avidin–dendrimer complex, Journal of Controlled Release, 95, 133–141, 2004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Marano R J, Wimmer N, Kearns P S, Thomas B G, Toth I, Brankov M and Rakoczy P E, Inhibition of in vitro VEGF expression and choroidal neovascularization by synthetic dendrimer peptide mediated delivery of a sense oligonucleotide, Experimental Eye Research, 79, 525–535, 2004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. McQuire R G, Green D, Walsh D, Hall S, Chane-Ching J Y, Oreffo R O C and Mann S, Fabrication of hydroxyapatite sponges by dextran sulphate/amino acid templating, Biomaterials, 26, 6652–6656, 2005.Google Scholar
  66. Monsigny M, Roche A C, Midoux P and Mayer R, Glycoconjugates as carriers for specific delivery of therapeutic drugs and genes, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 14, 1–24, 1994.Google Scholar
  67. Morishita N, Nakagami H, Morishita R, Takeda S, Mishima F, Terazono B, Nishijima S, Kaneda Y and Tanaka N, Magnetic nanoparticles with surface modification enhanced gene delivery of HVJ-E vector, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 334, 1121–1126, 2005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Mozafari M R, Baran E T, Yurdugul S and Omri A, Liposome-based carrier systems. In: Nanoliposomes: From Fundamentals to Recent Developments. Mozafari M R & Mortazavi S M (Eds.), Trafford Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK, pp 79–87, 2005.Google Scholar
  69. Mozafari M R and Sahin N O, Manufacturing methods and mechanism of formation of lipid vesicles. In: Nanoliposomes: From Fundamentals to Recent Developments. Mozafari M R & Mortazavi S M (Eds.), Trafford Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK, pp 39–48, 2005.Google Scholar
  70. Muvaffak A, Deliloglu G I, Gunduz U and Hasirci N, Preparation and characterization of a biodegradable drug targeting system for anticancer delivery: Microsphere-antibody conjugate, Journal of Drug Targeting, 13, 151–159, 2005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Muvaffak A, Deliloglu G I and Hasirci N, Cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil entrapped in gelatin microspheres, Journal of Microencapsulation, 21, 293–306, 2004a.Google Scholar
  72. Muvaffak A, Deliloglu I G and Hasirci N, Prolong cytotoxic effect colchicines released from biodegradable microspheres, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research PartB: Applied Biomaterials, 71, 295–304, 2004b.Google Scholar
  73. Muvaffak A and Hasirci N, Controlled release from glutaraldehyde crosslinked gelatin microspheres, Technology and Health Care, 10, 347–350, 2002.Google Scholar
  74. Namazi H and Adeli M, Dendrimers of citric acid and poly (ethylene glycol) as the new drug-delivery agents, Biomaterials, 26, 1175–1183, 2005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Nishiyama N, Bae Y, Miyata K, Fukushima S and Kataoka K, Smart polymeric micelles for gene and drug delivery, Drug Discovery Today: Technologies, 2, 21–26, 2005.Google Scholar
  76. Nostrum C F V, Polymeric micelles to deliver photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 56, 9–16, 2004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Okuda T, Sugiyama A, Niidome T and Aoyagi H, Characters of dendritic poly(L-lysine) analogues with the terminal lysines replaced with arginines and histidines as gene carriers in vitro, Biomaterials, 25, 537–544, 2004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Ooya T, Lee J and Park K, Effects of ethylene glycol-based graft, star-shaped, and dendritic polymers on solubilization and controlled release of paclitaxel, Journal of Controlled Release, 93, 121–127, 2003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Ozden M Y and Hasirci V N, Preparation and characterization of polymer coated small unilamellar vesicles, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) – General Subjects, 1075, 102–108, 1991.Google Scholar
  80. Pal A, Esumi K and Pal T, Preparation of nanosized gold particles in a biopolymer using UV photoactivation, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 288, 396–401, 2005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Pan B, Gao F and Gu H, Dendrimer modified magnetite nanoparticles for protein immobilization, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 284, 1–6, 2005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Prompruk K, Govender T, Zhang S, Xiong C D and Stolnik S, Synthesis of a novel PEG-block-poly(aspartic acid-stat-phenylalanine) copolymer shows potential for formation of a micellar drug carrier, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 297, 242–253, 2005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Raju N, Ranganathan R S, Tweedle M F and Swenson R E, A new dendrimer scaffold for preparing dimers or tetramers of biologically active molecules, Tetrahedron Letters, 46, 1463–1465, 2005.Google Scholar
  84. Rapoport N, Stabilization and activation of Pluronic micelles for tumor-targeted drug delivery, Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 16, 93–111, 1999.Google Scholar
  85. Rittner K, Benavente A, Bompard-Sorlet A, Heitz F, Divita G, Brasseur R and Jacobs E, New basic membrane-destabilizing peptides for plasmid-based gene delivery in vitro and in vivo, Molecular Therapy, 5, 104–114, 2002.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Rusu V M, Ng C H, Wilke M, Tiersch B, Fratzl P and Peter M G, Size-controlled hydroxyapatite nanoparticles as self-organized organic-inorganic composite materials, Biomaterials, 26, 5414–5426, 2005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Sagidullin A, Fritzinger B, Scheler U and Skirda V D, Self-diffusion of low-generation PAMAM dendrimers with hydroxyl surface groups in solutions: a general regularity, Polymer, 45, 165–170, 2004.Google Scholar
  88. Sahoo S K and Labhasetwar V, Nanotech approaches to drug delivery and imaging, Drug Discovery Today, 8, 1112–1120, 2003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Sakallioglu A E, Yagmurlu A, Dindar H, Hasirci N, Renda N and Deveci M S, Sustained local application of low-dose epidermal growth factor on steroid-inhibited colonic would healing, Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 39, 591–595, 2004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Sakallioglu A E, Yagmurlu A, Dindar H, Hasirci N, Renda N and Gokcora I H, Effects of low-dose epidermal growth factor loaded gelatin microspheres in colonic anastomosis, Technology and Health Care, 10, 328–331, 2002.Google Scholar
  91. Salvage J P, Rose S F, Phillips G J, Hanlon G W, Lloyd A W, Ma I Y, Armes S P, Billingham N C and Lewis A L, Novel biocompatible phosphorylcholine-based self-assembled nanoparticles for drug delivery, Journal of Controlled Release, 104, 259–270, 2005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Sampathkumar S G and Yarema K J, Targeting cancer cells with dendrimers, Chemistry and Biology, 12, 5–6, 2005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Sapra P and Allen T M, Ligand-targeted liposomal anticancer drugs, Progress in Lipid Research, 42, 439–462, 2003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Sashiwa H and Aiba S, Chemically modified chitin and chitosan as biomaterials, Progress in Polymer Science, 887–908, 2004.Google Scholar
  95. Schatzlein A G, Zinselmeyer B H, Elouzi A, Dufes C, Chim Y T, Roberts C J, Davies M C, Munro A, Gray A I and Uchegbu I F, Preferential liver gene expression with polypropylenimine dendrimers, Journal of Controlled Release, 101, 247–258, 2005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Serbetci K, Korkusuz F and Hasirci N, Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Hydroxyapatite Impregnated Bone Cement, Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 30, 543–549, 2000.Google Scholar
  97. Serbetci K, Korkusuz F and Hasirci N, Thermal and Mechanical Properties of Hydroxyapatite Impregnated Acrylic Bone cements, Polymer Testing, 23, 145–155, 2004.Google Scholar
  98. Serbetci K, Orhun S, Korkusuz F and Hasirci N, In vivo testing of hydroxyapatite impregnated acrylic bone cement, Technology and Health Care, 10, 285–288, 2002.Google Scholar
  99. Shantha K L and Harding D R K, Preparation and in-vitro evaluation of poly [N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone-polyethylene glycol diacrylate]-chitosan interpolymeric pH-responsive hydrogels for oral drug delivery, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 207, 65–70, 2000.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Shieh D B, Cheng F Y, Su C H, Yeh C S, Wu M T, Wu Y N, Tsai C Y, Wu C L, Chen D H and Chou C H, Aqueous dispersions of magnetite nanoparticles with NH3 + surfaces for magnetic manipulations of biomolecules and MRI contrast agents, Biomaterials, 26, 7183–7191, 2005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Simard P, Hoarau D, Khalid M N, Roux E and Leroux J-C, Preparation and in vivo evaluation of PEGylated spherulite formulations, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) – Biomembranes, 1715, 37–48, 2005.Google Scholar
  102. Singh B and Florence A T, Hydrophobic dendrimer -derived nanoparticles, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 298, 348–353, 2005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Sinico C, Manconi M, Peppi M, Lai F, Valenti D and Fadda A M, Liposomes as carriers for dermal delivery of tretinoin: in vitro evaluation of drug permeation and vesicle–skin interaction, Journal of Controlled Release, 103, 123–136, 2005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. Sinha V R, Bansal K, Kaushik R, Kumria R and Trehan A, Poly-epsilon-caprolactone microspheres and nanospheres: an overview, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 278, 1–23, 2004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Smith D K, Hirst A R, Love C S, Hardy J G, Brignell S V and Huang B, Self-assembly using dendritic building blocks-towards controllable nanomaterials, Progress in Polymer Science, 30, 220–293, 2005.Google Scholar
  106. Sot J, Aranda F J, Collado M I, Goni FM and Alonso A, Different effects of long- and short-chain ceramides on the gel-fluid and lamellar-hexagonal transitions of phospholipids: a calorimetric, NMR, and x-ray diffraction study. Biophysical Journal, 88, 3368–3380, 2005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Taniguchi T, Duracher D, Delair T, Elaissari A and Pichot C, Adsorption/desorption behavior and covalent grafting of an antibody onto cationic amino- functionalized poly (styrene-N-isopropylacrylamide) core-shell latex particles, Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 29, 53–65, 2003.Google Scholar
  108. Tripathi P K, Khopade A J, Nagaich S, Shrivastava S, Jain S and Jain N K, Dendrimer grafts for delivery of 5-flurouracil, Pharmazie, 57, 261–264, 2002.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Twaites B R, Alarcon C H, Cunliffe D, Lavigne M, Pennadam S, Smith J R, Gorecki D C and Alexander C, Thermo and pH responsive polymers as gene delivery vectors: effect of polymer architecture on DNA complexation in vitro, Journal of Controlled Release, 97, 551–566, 2004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Uguralp S, Karabulut A B, Mizrak B, Kaymaz F, Kiziltay A and Hasirci N, The effect of sustained and local administration of epidermal growth factor on improving bilateral testicular tissue after torsion, Urological Research, 32, 323–331, 2004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Ulubayram K, Eroglu I and Hasirci N, Gelatin microspheres and sponges for delivery of macromolecules, Journal of Biomaterials Applications, 16, 227–241, 2002.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Ulubayram K, Korkusuz P, Ertan C, Cakar N and Hasirci N, EGF containing gelatin based wound dressings, Biomaterials, 22, 1345–1356, 2001.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. Venkatesan N, Yoshimitsu J, Ito Y, Shibata N and Takada K, Liquid filled nanoparticles as a drug delivery tool for protein therapeutics, Biomaterials, 26, 7154–7163, 2005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. Vierling P, Santaella C and Greiner J, Highly fluorinated amphiphiles as drug and gene carrier and delivery systems, Journal of Fluorine Chemistry, 107, 337–354, 2001.Google Scholar
  115. Vihola H, Laukkanen A, Hirvonen J and Tenhu H, Binding and release of drugs into and from thermosensitive poly(N-vinyl caprolactam) nanoparticles, European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 16, 69–74, 2002.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. Visser C C, Stevanovic S, Voorwinden L H, Bloois L V, Gaillard P J, Danhof M, Crommelin D J A and Boer A G, Targeting liposomes with protein drugs to the blood-brain barrier in vitro, European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 25, 299–305, 2005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. Vogel M, Voigt C, Gross U M and Muller-Mai C M, In vivo comparison of bioactive glass particles in rabbits, Biomaterials, 22, 357–362, 2001.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. Wada K, Arima H, Tsutsumi T, Chihara Y, Hattori K, Hirayama F and Uekama K, Improvement of gene delivery mediated by mannosylated dendrimer/ α-cyclodextrin conjugates, Journal of Controlled Release, 104, 397–413, 2005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. Wang J, Mongayt D A, Lukyanov A N, Levchenko T S and Torchilin V P, Preparation and in vitro synergistic anticancer effect of Vitamin K3 and 1,8-diazabicyclo[5,4,0]undec-7-ene in poly(ethylene glycol)-diacyllipid micelles, International Journal of Pharmaceutics , 272, 129–135, 2004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. Wang Y, Boros P, Liu J, Qin L, Bai Y, Bielinska A U, Kukowska-Latallo J F, Baker J R and Bromberg J S, DNA/dendrimer complexes mediate gene transfer into murine cardiac transplants ex vivo, Molecular Therapy, 2, 602–608, 2000.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. Wasylewska E L and Iciek M, Positive cooperativity in substrate binding of human prostatic acid phosphatase entrapped in AOT–isooctane–water reverse micelles, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 273, 632–637, 2004.Google Scholar
  122. Wiwattanapatapee R, Carreno-Gomez B, Malik N and Duncan R, Anionic PAMAM dendrimers rapidly cross adult rat intestine in vitro: a potential oral delivery system, Pharmaceutical Research, 17, 991–998, 2000.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. Xin R, Leng Y, Chen J and Zhang Q, A comparative study of calcium phosphate formation on bioceramics in vitro and in vivo, Biomaterials, 26, 6477–6486, 2005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. Xiong X Y, Tam K C and Gan L H, Synthesis and thermal responsive properties of P(LA-b-EO-b-PO-b-EO-b-LA) block copolymers with short hydrophobic poly(lactic acid) (PLA) segments, Polymer, 46, 1841–1850, 2005.Google Scholar
  125. Yilmaz E, Burke A, Hasirci N and Yilmaz O, Chelating capacity of chitosan for complexed iron (III), In: Chitosan in Pharmacy and Chemistry, Ed. Muzzarelli R A A and Muzzarelli C, Atec, Italy, 225–229, 2002.Google Scholar
  126. Yoshida M, Asano M and Kumakura M, A new temperature-sensitive hydrogel with a-amino acid group as side chain of polymer, European Polymer Journal, 25, 1197–1202, 1989.Google Scholar
  127. Yoo H, and Juliano R L, Enhanced delivery of antisense oligonucleotides with fluorophore-conjugated PAMAM dendrimers, Nucleic Acids Research, 28, 4225–4231, 2000.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. Zeng Y P, Jiang D L, Werner J P and Greil P, Fabrication of Al2O3–A/W bioglass bioactivity tapes by tape casting, Materials Letters, 57, 463–468, 2002.Google Scholar
  129. Zhang K and X Y Xiao Yu Wu, Temperature and pH-responsive polymeric composite membranes for controlled delivery of proteins and peptides, Biomaterials, 25, 5281–5291, 2004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. Zhang Y and Zhuo R, Synthesis and in vitro drug release behavior of amphiphilic triblock copolymer nanoparticles based on poly (ethylene glycol) and polycaprolactone, Biomaterials, 26, 6736–6742, 2005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. Zweers M L T and Grijpma D W, The preparation of monodisperse biodegradable polyester nanoparticles with a controlled size, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research part B Applied Biomaterials, 2, 559–566, 2003.Google Scholar
  132. Zweers M L T, Engbers G H M, Grijpma D W and Feijen J, In vitro degradation of nanoparticles prepared from polymers based on DL-lactide, glycolide and poly (ethylene oxide), Journal of Controlled Release, 100, 347–356, 2004.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nesrin Hasirci
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryMiddle East Technical, UniversityFaculty of Arts and SciencesTurkey

Personalised recommendations