Skip to main content

Role of Microcracking in Cortical Bones

  • Conference paper
  • 1417 Accesses

Abstract

The influence of the microdefect interactions on the stress intensity factors (SIF’s) at the tip of the macrocracks in cortical bones is considered using one of the linear fracture mechanics models developed by Tamuzs at el[1]A human bone is a living organism governed by quite complex biological processes. However, at any given moment of time a frame of the human body is a mechanical structure of composite materials (of various mechanical properties for the different types of bones). As it is established experimentally [2], microcracks and other microdefects are present in cortical bones at every stage of life of the bone. They play a vital role in the process of remodeling of the bone. With age, the distances between microcracks are decreasing [10], making “bridges” (uncracked ligament) smaller that causes increase of SIF’s and decrease of the critical fracture load. In another words , a bone fracture can occur even without extraordinary external force. The objective of this work is to provide a mechanistic interpretation of interaction of macro-and microcracks in cortical bones. The structural integrity of a composite material of the bone is obviously vital for the work of the human body frame. Traditionally, the bone quality is defined in terms of bone mineral density (BMD), namely, the amount of bone mineral per unit of volume. The fracture of the bone may occur not only as a result of a single impact but may also be caused by the microcrack interactions resulting in so called stress fracture (without a major impact). Therefore, for comprehensive understanding of the bone fracture it is necessary to study the microstructural interactions in bones. As the linear fracture mechanics is considered by most researchers an appropriate tool for investigating failure processes in bones [2], the analysis of the stress intensity factors governing the hierarchy in macro-microcrack propagation and the amplification (“intrinsic”) and shielding (“extrinsic”) effects is conducted using solutions obtained in [1,4].

Keywords

  • Bone Mineral Density
  • Stress Intensity Factor
  • Cortical Bone
  • Critical Load
  • Stress Intensity Factor

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Tamuzs,V., N.Romalis, and V.Petrova (2001), Fracture of Solids with Microdefects, Nova Science Publishers, 238p.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ritchie, R.O., J.N. Kinney, J.J.Kruzic, and R.K.Nalla (2004), A Fracture Mechanics and Mechanistic Approach to the Failure of Cortical Bone, Fatigue Fracture Engineering Material Structure, 28, 345-371

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  3. Petrova, V., V.Tamuzs, and N.Romalis (2000), A Survey of Macro-Microcrack Interaction Problems, Appl. Mech.Rev., Vol 53, No.5, pp. 117-145

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  4. Romalis,N.and V.Tamuzs (1984), Propagation of a Main Crack in a Body with Distributed Microcracks (Russian) Mekh. Komposit Mater., No.1, pp. 42-51 (Engl.Transl: Mech. Composite Materials, pp. 35-43).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ritchie, R.O. (1988), Mechanism of fatigue crack propagation in metals, ceramics and composites: Role of crack-tip shielding. Mater.Sci.Engng 103, 15-28.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vasishth, D., Behiri, J.C. and Bonefield, W. (1997), Crack growth resistance in cortical bone: Concept of microcrack toughening. J.Biomech., 30, 763-769

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  7. Norman, T.L., Vashishth, D.,and Burr, D.B. (1995) Fracture toughness of human bone under tension. J.Biomech., 28, 309-320

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  8. Nalla, R.K., Kruzik, J.J., Kinney, J.H. and Ritchie, R.O.(2005) Mechanistics aspects of fracture and R-curve behaviour in human cortical bone, Biomater. 26, 217-231

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  9. Wu,P.C. and Vashishth, D. (2002) Age related changes in cortical bone toughness. In: 2nd Joint EMBS/BMES Conference, IEEE, Houston, Texas, USA, 425-426

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nalla, R.K., Kruzik, J.J., Kinney,J.H. and Ritchie, R.O.(2004) Effect of aging on the toughness of human cortical bone: Evaluations by R-curves, Bone, 35, , 1240-1246

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Romalis, N.B. (2007). Role of Microcracking in Cortical Bones. In: Sobh, T. (eds) Innovations and Advanced Techniques in Computer and Information Sciences and Engineering. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6268-1_64

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6268-1_64

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6267-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6268-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics