Advertisement

Efforts to aid downstream migrating brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) kelts and smolts passing a hydroelectric dam and a spillway

Fish Telemetry
Part of the Developments in Hydrobiology 195 book series (DIHY, volume 195)

Abstract

The autumn and spring descent of 41 brown trout kelts (spent trout) (average total length Lt 75.9 cm) and the spring descent of 27 hatchery-reared smolts (average Lt 26.2 cm) were studied by radiotelemetry in 1993/1994 (kelts) and 1997/1998 (kelts and smolts) at the Hunderfossen dam and power plant, south-east Norway. In 1999 we studied spring descent of 48 untagged kelts by visual observations and video-monitoring at one spillway. In autumn 1993 and 1997, 62.4% and 44.0% of the tagged kelts migrated downstream to the dam at water temperatures between 0.1 and 0.8°C. During release of spillwater, the kelts gathered along the dam with limited movements. Neither smolts nor kelts used the 2 m submerged turbine shafts as a pathway to migrate downstream Hunderfossen dam. Nor did release of large amounts of deep water through spillways provide downstream migration possibilities for kelts and possibly for smolts. The majority of both smolts and kelts migrated downstream at short periods of surface water release through the spillways, indicating high importance of surface water release. The threshold value of descend of kelts at surface release was between 1 and 4 m3 s−1 which correspond to a water column between 12 and 36 cm. These findings are highly relevant regarding hydroelectric development in river systems containing iteroparous salmonid species.

Keywords

Brown trout Kelts Downstream migration Regulated river Spillway Water release 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aarestrup, K., M. C. Lucas & J. A. Hansen, 2003. Efficiency of a nature-like bypass channel for sea trout (Salmo trutta) ascending a small Danish stream studied by PIT telemetry. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 12: 160–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aass, P., P. Sondrup Nielsen & Å. Brabrand, 1989. Effects of river regulation on the structure of a fast-growing brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) population. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 3: 225–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aass, P. & M. Kraabøl, 1999. The exploitation of a migrating brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) population; change of fishing methods due to river regulation. Regulated Rivers; Research & Management 15: 211–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnekleiv, J. V. & M. Kraabøl, 1996. Migratory behaviour of adult fast-growing brown trout (Salmo trutta, L.) in relation to water flow in a regulated Norwegian river. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 12: 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arnekleiv, J. V. & M. Kraabøl, 1999. Upstream and downstream migrations of brown trout at the Hunderfossen power plant. pp. 49–55. In Kamula, R & A. Laine, (eds), Proceedings of the Nordic Conference on Fish Passage. DN-notat1999-1: 169 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Arnekleiv, J. V. & L. Rønning, 2004. Migratory patterns and return to the catch site of adult brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) in a regulated river. River Research and Applications 20: 929–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carlsson, J., K. Aarestrup, F. Nordwall, I. Näslund, T. Eriksson & J. E. L. Carlsson, 2004. Migration of landlocked brown trout in two Scandinavian streams as revealed from trap data. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 13: 161–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coutant, C. C. & R. R. Whitney, 2000. Fish behavior in relation to passage through hydropower turbines: A review. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 129: 351–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eiler, J. H., 1990. Radio transmitters used to study salmon in glacial rivers. American Fisheries Society Symposium 7: 364–369.Google Scholar
  10. Hembre, B., J. V. Arnekleiv & J. H. L’Abée-Lund, (2001). Effect of water discharge and temperature on the seaward migration of anadromous brown trout, Salmo trutta, smolts. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 10: 61–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hvidsten, N. A. & B. O. Johnsen, 1997. Screening of descending Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) smolts from a hydropower intake in the river Orkla, Norway. Nordic Journal of Freshwater Research 73: 44–49.Google Scholar
  12. Jensen, A. J. & P. Aass, 1995. Migration of a fast-growing population of brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) through a fish ladder in relation to water flow and water temperature. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 10: 217–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jepsen, N., K. Aarestrup, G. Rasmussen & F. Økland, 1998. Survival of radio-tagged Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and trout (S. trutta) smolts passing a reservoir during seaward migration. Hydrobiologia 371–372: 347–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jonsson, B., 1985. Life history patterns of freshwater resident and sea-run migrant brown trout in Norway. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 114: 182–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jonsson, N., 1991. Influence of water flow, water temperature and light on fish migration in rivers. Nordic Journal of Freshwater Research 66: 20–35.Google Scholar
  16. Jonsson, B. & N. Jonsson, 2002. Migration of anadromous brown trout Salmo trutta in a Norwegian river. Freshwater Biology 47: 1391–1401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jungwirth, M., 1998. River continuum and fish migration – Going beyond the longitudinal river corridor in understanding ecological integrity. In Jungwirth M., M. S. Schmutz & S. Weiss (eds), Fish migration and fish bypasses. Fishing News Books. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford, 127–145.Google Scholar
  18. Kemp, P. S., M. H. Gessel & J. G. Williams, 2005a. Fine-scale behavioural responses of Pacific salmonid smolts as they encounter divergence and acceleration of flow. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 134: 390–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kemp, P. S., M. H. Gessel & J. G. Williams, 2005b. Seaward migrating subyearling chinook salmon avoid overhead cover. Journal of Fish Biology 67: 1381–1391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Klemetsen, A., P.-A. Amundsen, J. B. Dempson, B. Jonsson, N. Jonsson, M. F. O’Connell & E. Mortensen, 2003. Atlantic salmon Salmo salar L., brown trout Salmo trutta L. and Arctic charr Salvelinus alpinus (L.): a review of aspects of their life histories. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 12: 1–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kraabøl, M. & J. V. Arnekleiv, 1998. Records of spawning locations in fast-growing brown trout populations in the rivers Gudbrandsdalslågen and Gausa. Vitenskapsmuseet Rapp. Zool. Ser. 2: 1–28 (in Norwegian, English summary).Google Scholar
  22. Larinier, M., 1998. Upstream and downstream fish passage experience in France. In Jungwirth M., M. S. Schmutz & S. Weiss (eds), Fish migration and fish bypasses. Fishing News Books. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford: 127–145.Google Scholar
  23. Linlokken, A., 1993. Efficiency of fishways and impact of dams on the migration of grayling and brown trout in the Glomma river system, South-eastern Norway. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 8: 145–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mellas, E. J. & J. M. Haynes, 1985. Swimming performance and behaviour of rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) and white perch (Morone americana): effect of attaching telemetry transmitters. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 42: 488–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Montèn, E., 1985. Fish and turbines; fish injuries during passage through power station turbines. Vattenfall AB, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
  26. Muir, W. D., S. G. Smith & B. P. Sandfjord, 2001. Survival of juvenile salmonids passing through bypass systems, turbines and spillways with and without flow deflectors at Snake river dams. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 21: 135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Northcote, T. G., 1992. Migration and residency in stream salmonids – some ecological considerations and evolutionary consequences. Nordic Journal of Freshwater Research 67: 5–17.Google Scholar
  28. Northcote, T. G., 1998. Migratory behaviour of fish and its significance to movement through riverine fish passage facilities. In Jungwirth M., M. S. Schmutz & S. Weiss (eds), Fish migration and fish bypasses. Fishing News Books. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford, 3–18.Google Scholar
  29. Ovidio, M. & J. C. Philippart, 2002. The impact of small physical obstacles on upstream movements of six species of fish. Hydrobiologia 483: 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rivinoja, P., 2005. Migration problems of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) in flow regulated rivers. Doctoral thesis No. 2005:114. Sweedish University of Agricultural Aciences, Umeå.Google Scholar
  31. Rivinoja, P., S. McKinnell & H. Lundqvist, 2001. Hindrances to upstream migration of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in northern Swedish river caused by a hydroelectric power-station. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 17: 101–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rustadbakken, A., J. H. L’Abée-Lund, J. V. Arnekleiv & M. Kraabøl, 2004. Reproductive migration of brown trout in a small Norwegian river studied by telemetry. Journal of Fish Biology 64: 2–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Scruton, D. A., R. S. McKinley, N. Kuowen, W. Eddy & R. K. Booth, 2003a. Improvement and optimisation of fish guidance efficiency (FGE) at a behavioural fish protection system for downstream migrating Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) smolts. River Research & Applications 19: 605–617.DOI:10.1002/rra.735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Scruton, D. A., C. J. Pennell, M. J. Robertson, E. W. Clarke & R. S. McKinley, 2003b. Telemetry studies of the entrainment and fate of downstream migrating Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) smolts at hydroelectric installations on the Expoits River, Newfoundland, Canada. Proceedings from the Fifth conference on fish telemetry held in Europe 9–13 June 2003, Ustica, Palmero, Italy.Google Scholar
  35. Skalski, J. R., R. Townsend, J. Lady, A. E. Giorgi, J. R. Stevenson & R. D. McDonald, 2002. Estimating route-specific passage and survival probabilities at a hydroelectric project from smolt radiotelemetry studies. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59: 1385–1393. DOI: 10.1139/F02-094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thorstad, E. B., F. Økland & B. Finstad, 2000. Effects of telemetry transmitters on swimming performance of adult Atlantic salmon. Journal of Fish Biology 57: 531--535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jo Vegar Arnekleiv
    • 1
  • Morten Kraabøl
    • 1
  • Jon Museth
    • 2
  1. 1.Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Museum of Natural History and ArchaeologyTrondheimNorway
  2. 2.Norwegian Institute for Nature ResearchLillehammerNorway

Personalised recommendations