Advertisement

Cognitive Measurement in Career Guidance

  • Jacques Grégoire
  • Frédéric Nils
Chapter

When career guidance began in the early 1900s, the principal aim of the vocational process was job placement within the new industrial economy (Pope, 2000). The counsellors’ clients were mostly young boys ending elementary school and starting work, as well as people migrating from rural to urban industrialised areas. At that time, the person/job matching perspective was focused on the fit between individual aptitudes and those required by the job. In this context, measurement was a key component of the process. Vocational counsellors were considered as assessment experts of physical and mental aptitudes, who had to convince the counselee of the validity of their advice (Guichard & Huteau, 2001; Parsons, 1909). It is important to point out that, during this period, many methods used for these assessments were based on common-sense descriptions of mental activity and job demands. Valid scientific procedures were clearly needed to make career counselling respectable in Western countries (Whiteley, 1984). Within the USA and certain newly industrialised countries, this psycho-technical conception of guidance inspired most of the research and reflection into vocational psychology until the 1950s.

Between World War I and World War II, the scope of vocational psychology was broadened to accommodate new clients. Just after WWI, the guidance process entered the classroom and important methodologies were implemented for elementary and secondary school students, notably in cognitive measurement. Since WWII, college and university students have also become part of the guidance counselees. As a consequence to the promotion and organisation of educational guidance, the assessment of physical abilities almost vanished, while the development and use of cognitive measurement methods increased. Among the tools developed at that time, the well-known GATB may be cited (General Aptitude Test Battery), the ASVAB (Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery), the Wechsler-Bellevue Intelligence Scale and the DAT (Differential Aptitude Tests). It must also be underlined that, between WWI and WWII, another transition in assessment occurred. While the evaluation of cognitive abilities was reaching its apogee, the 1930s marked the beginning of vocational interest assessment (e.g., Strong, 1936).

Keywords

Emotional Intelligence Cognitive Measurement General Intelligence Career Guidance Fluid Intelligence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackerman, P. L., & Beier, M. E. (2003). Intelligence, personality, and interests in the career choice process. Journal of Career Assessment, 11, 205–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackerman, P. L., & Beier, M. E. (2006). Determinants of domain knowledge and independent study learning in an adult sample. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 366–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ackerman, P. L., & Heggestad, E. D. (1997). Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence of overlapping traits. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 219–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ackerman, P. L., Bowen, K. R., Beier, M. E., & Kanfer, R. (2001). Determinants in individual differences and gender differences in knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 797–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amelang, M., & Steinmayr, R. (2006). Is there a validity increment for tests of emotional intelligence in explaining the variance of performance criteria? Intelligence, 34, 459–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aubret, J., & Blanchard, S. (2005). Pratique du bilan personalisé [Tailored assessment into practice]. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar
  7. Bar-On, R. (1997). BarOn Emotional Quotient Inventory. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  8. Baydoun, R. B., & Neuman, G. A. (1992). The future of the General Aptitude Test Battery (GATB) for use in public and private testing. Journal of Business and Psychology, 7, 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bennet, G. K., Seashore, H. G., & Wesman, A. G. (1990). Differential aptitude tests. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt.Google Scholar
  10. Binet, A. (1911). Nouvelles recherches sur la mesure du niveau intellectuel chez les enfants d’école [New researches on the measurement of pupils’ intelligence]. L’Année Psychologique, 17, 145–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Binet, A. (1973). Les idées modernes sur les enfants [Contemporary ideas about children]. Paris: Flammarion. (Original work published in 1909).Google Scholar
  12. Brody, N. (2003). Construct validation of the Sternberg Triarchic Abilities test. Comment and reanalysis. Intelligence, 31, 319–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown, K. G., Le, H., & Schmidt, F. L. (2006). Specific aptitude theory revisited: Is there incremental validity for training performance? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14, 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bruner, J. S. (1974). Beyond the information given. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  15. Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Carroll, J. B. (1997). The three-stratum theory of cognitive abilities. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment (pp. 122–130). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  17. Cattell, R. B. (1941). Some theoretical issues in adult intelligence testing. Psychological Bulletin, 38, 592.Google Scholar
  18. Cattell, R. B. (1963). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cattell, R. B., & Cattell, A. S. K. (1949). Culture free intelligence test, scale 1, handbook. Champaign, IL: IPAT.Google Scholar
  20. Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. (1997). Schooling, intelligence and income. American Psychologist, 52, 1051–1058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chen, J. -Q., & Gardner, H. (1997). Alternative assessment from a multiple intelligences theoretical perspective. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment (pp. 105–121). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  22. Deary, I. J., Whalley, L. J., Lemmon, H., Crawford, J. R., & Starr, J. M. (2000). The stability of individual differences in mental abilities from childhood to old age: Follow-up of the 1932 Scottish mental survey. Intelligence, 28, 49–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fergusson, D. M., Horwood, L. J., & Ridder, E. M. (2005). Show me the child at seven II: Childhood intelligence and later outcomes in adolescence and young adulthood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 850–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  25. Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences. The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  26. Gardner, H. (1999). Are there additional intelligences? The case for naturalist, spiritual and existential intelligences. In J. Cain (Ed.), Education: Information and transformation (pp. 111–132). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  27. Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ? New York: Bantham.Google Scholar
  28. Gottfredson, L. S. (2003). The challenge and promise of cognitive career assessment. Journal of Career Assessment, 20, 1–21.Google Scholar
  29. Grégoire, J. (2006). L’examen clinique de l’intelligence de l’enfant [Clinical assessment of children’s intelligence]. Liège, Belgium: Mardaga.Google Scholar
  30. Guichard, J., & Huteau, M. (2001). Psychologie de l’orientation [Guidance psychology]. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar
  31. Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  32. Guilford, J. P. (1982). Cognitive’s psychology ambiguities: Some suggested remedies. Psychological Review, 89, 48–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Horn, J. L., & Noll, J. (1997). Human cognitive capabilities: Gf-Gc theory. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment (pp. 53–91). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  34. Hunter, J. E., & Hunter, R. F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 72–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Juan-Espinosa, M., Garcia, L. F., Escorial, S., Rebollo, I., Colom, R., & Abad, F. J. (2002). Intelligence dedifferentiation hypothesis: Evidence from the WAIS-III. Intelligence, 30, 395–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Law, K. S., Wong, C.-S., & Song, L. J. (2006). The construct and criterion validity of emotional intelligence and its potential utility for management studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 483–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D. (1997). Emotional IQ test. Needham, MA: Virtual Knowledge.Google Scholar
  38. Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D. (2000). Models of emotional intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Parsons, F. (1909). Choosing a vocation. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  40. Pope, M. (2000). A brief history of career counseling in the United States. Career Development Quaterly, 48, 194–211.Google Scholar
  41. Reeve, C. L., & Heggestad, E. D. (2004). Differential relations between general cognitive ability and interest-vocation fit. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, 77, 385–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Roberts, R., Zeidner, M., & Matthews, G. (2001). Does emotional intelligence meet traditional standards for an intelligence? Some new data and conclusions. Emotion, 1, 196–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Salgado, J. F., Anderson, A., Moscoso, S., Bertua, C., de Fruyt, F., & Rolland, J. -P. (2003a). A meta-analytic study of General Mental Ability validity for different occupations in European Community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 1068–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Salgado, J. F., Anderson, N., Moscoso, S., Bertua, C., & de Fruyt, F. (2003b). International validity of GMA and cognitive abilities: A European Community meta-analysis. Personal Psychology, 56, 573–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personal psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2004). General mental ability in world of work: Occupational attainment and job performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 162–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schooler, C., Mulatu, M. S., & Oates, G. (1999). The continuing effects of substantively complex work on the intellectual functioning of older workers. Psychology and Aging, 14, 483–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shea, D. L., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2001). Importance of assessing spatial ability in intellectually talented young adolescents: A 20-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 604–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shearer, C. B. (2004). Using a multiple intelligences assessment to promote teacher development and student achievement. Teachers College Record, 106, 147–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Spearman, C. (1904). General intelligence, objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Sternberg, R. J., & Detterman, D. K. (1986). What is intelligence? Contemporary viewpoints on its nature and definition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  53. Sternberg, R. J., Castejón, J. L., Prieto, M. D., Hautamäki, J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2001). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Sternberg Triarchic Abilities test in three international samples. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Strong, E. (1936). Interest of men and women. Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 49–67.Google Scholar
  55. Thorndike, E. L. (1920). Intelligence and its uses. Harper’s Magazine, 140, 227–235.Google Scholar
  56. Thurstone, L. L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  57. Thurstone, L. L. (1947). Multiple-factor analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  58. Watts, A. G., Dartois, C., & Plant, P. (1987). Careers guidance services within the European community: Contrasts and common trends. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 10, 179–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wechsler, D. (1944). Measurement of adult intelligence. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wechsler, D. (1950). Cognitive, conative and non-intellective intelligence. American Psychologist, 5, 78–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wechsler, D. (1997). WAIS-III WMS-III technical manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  62. Whiteley, J. (1984). Counseling psychology: A historical perspective. The Counseling Psychologist, 12, 3–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jacques Grégoire
    • 1
  • Frédéric Nils
    • 1
  1. 1.Catholic University of LouvainBelgium

Personalised recommendations