Interest Assessment in an International Context

  • Terence J. G. Tracey
  • Saurabh Gupta

The assessment of interests has served as the cornerstone for the field of vocational psychology, especially in the United States, for the better part of a century. Interests have served as crucial information in helping individuals learn about themselves, the world of work, and making occupational and educational decisions. At least with respect to the United States, the assessment of interests has been very well done and rivals assessment in most any area of psychology (Fouad, 1999). Given this, it is not uncommon for these interest instruments to be used in other cultures. While such applications can be cost effective, such applications can also be invalid (e.g., see chapter 26). Care must be taken to thoroughly evaluate any application. In this chapter the focus will be on interest assessment in cross cultural contexts by reviewing the issues involved in cross cultural assessment generally and then apply this to interest assessment specifically. In the framework of this contribution the terms cross-cultural and international are used interchangeably but it is recognised that cultures can often be more specific than nationalities. Examples are the separate ethnic cultures found within the United States. So the discussion is not limited, nor should it be, by examining only national differences and similarities.


Career Guidance Occupational Choice Basic Interest Vocational Behavior Circular Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Assouline, M., & Meir, E. I. (1987). Meta-analysis of the relationship between congruence and well-being measures. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31, 319–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ben-Porath, Y. S. (1990). Cross-cultural assessment of personality: The case for replicatory factor analysis. In J. N. Butcher & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 8, pp. 27–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Berry, J. W. (1979). A cultural ecology of social behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 177–206). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  4. Berry, J. W. (1989). Imposed etics-emics-derived etics: The operationalization of a compelling idea. International Journal of Psychology, 24, 721–735.Google Scholar
  5. Borgen, F. H. (1986). New approaches to the assessment of interests. In W. B. Walsh & S. H Osipow (Eds.), Advances in vocational psychology: Vol. 1 The assessment of interests (pp. 31–54). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, S. D., & Gore, P. A., Jr. (1994). An evaluation of interest congruence indices: Distribution characteristics and measurement properties. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 310–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buss, A. R., & Royce, J. R. (1975). Detecting cross-cultural commonalities and differences: Intergroup factor analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 128–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Darcy, M. U. A. (2004). Examination of the structure of Irish students’ vocational interests and competence perceptions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 321–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Day, S. X., & Rounds, J. (1997). “A little more than kin, and less than kind”: Basic interests in vocational research and career counseling. Career Development Quarterly, 45, 207–220.Google Scholar
  11. Day, S. X., & Rounds, J. (1998). Universality of vocational interest structure among racial and ethnic minorities. American Psychologist, 53, 728–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fouad, N. A. (1999). Validity evidence for interest inventories. In M. L. Savickas & A. R. Spokane (Eds.), Vocational interests: Meaning, measurement, and counseling use (pp. 193–210). Palo Alto, CA: Davies-Black.Google Scholar
  13. Gati, I. (1979). A hierarchical model for the structure of vocational interests. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 15, 90–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gati, I. (1991). The structure of vocational interests. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 309–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guichard, J., & Lenz, J. (2005). Career theory from an international perspective. Career Development Quarterly, 54, 17–28.Google Scholar
  16. Gupta, S., & Tracey, T. J. G. (2005). Dharma and interest-occupation congruence in Asian Indian college students. Journal of Career Assessment, 3, 320–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hambleton, R. K. (2005). Issues, designs, and technical guidelines for adapting tests into multiple languages and cultures. In R. K. Hambleton, P. F. Merenda, & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Adapting educational and psychological tests to cross-cultural assessment (pp. 3–38). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  18. Harkness, J. (1998). Cross-cultural equivalence. Mannheim, Germany: ZUMA.Google Scholar
  19. Hesketh, B., & Rounds, J. (1995). International cross-cultural approaches to career development. In W. B. Walsh & S. H. Osipow (Eds.), Handbook of vocational psychology: Theory, research and practice (2nd ed., pp. 367–390). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  20. Holland, J. L. (1973). Making vocational choices: A theory of careers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  21. Holland, J. L. (1985). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  22. Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  23. Hubert, L., & Arabie, P. (1987). Evaluating order hypotheses within proximity matrices. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 172–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Irvine, S. H., & Carroll, W. K. (1985). Testing and assessment across cultures: Issues in methodology and theory. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology. Vol. 2: Methodology (pp. 181–244). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  25. Leong, F. T. L., Austin, J. T., Sekaran, U., & Komarraju, M. (1998). An evaluation of the cross-cultural validity of Holland’s theory: Career choices by workers in India. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 52, 441–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Long, L., & Tracey, T. J. G. (2006). Structure of RIASEC scores in China: A structural meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Long, L., Adams, R. S., & Tracey, T. J. G. (2005). Generalizability of interest structure to China: Application of the Personal Globe Inventory. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 66–80.Google Scholar
  28. Long, L., Watanabe, N., & Tracey, T. J. G. (2006). Structure of interests in Japan: Application to the Personal Globe Inventory occupational scales. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 38, 222–235.Google Scholar
  29. McAdams, D. P., & Pals, J. L. (2006). A new big 5: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. American Psychologist, 61, 204–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr., (1999). A five factor theory of personality. In L. Pervin & O. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 139–153). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  31. Prediger, D. J. (1994). Multicultural assessment standards: A compilation for counselors. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 27, 68–73.Google Scholar
  32. Rounds, J. B., & Tracey, T. J. (1990). From trait-and-factor to person-environment fit counseling: Theory and process. In W. B. Walsh & S. H. Osipow (Eds.), Career counseling: Contemporary topics in vocational psychology (pp. 1–44). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  33. Rounds, J., & Tracey, T. J. (1996). Cross-cultural structural equivalence of RIASEC models and measures. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 310–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rounds, J. B., Tracey, T. J., & Hubert, L. (1992). Methods for evaluating vocational interest structural hypotheses. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 40, 239–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Silvia, P. J. (2006). Exploring the psychology of interest. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Spokane. A. R. (1985). A review of research on person-environment congruence in Holland’s theory of careers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 26, 306–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Swanson, J. L., & Gore, P. A., Jr. (2000). Advances in vocational psychology theory and research. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Handbook of counseling psychology (3rd ed., pp. 233–269). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  38. Tinsley, H. E. A. (2000). The congruence myth revisited. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56, 405–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tracey, T. J. G. (1997). The structure of interests and self-efficacy estimations: An expanded examination of the spherical model of interests. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44, 32–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tracey, T. J. G. (2002). Personal globe inventory: Measurement of the spherical model of interests and competence beliefs. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60, 113–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tracey, T. J. G., & Rounds, J. B. (1993). Evaluating Holland’s and Gati’s vocational interest models: A structural meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 229–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tracey, T. J. G., & Rounds, J. (1995). The arbitrary nature of Holland’s RIASEC types: Concentric circles as a structure. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42, 431–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tracey, T. J. G., & Rounds, J. (1996). Spherical representation of vocational interests. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 48, 3–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tracey, T. J. G., Watanabe, N., & Schneider, P. L. (1997). Structural invariance of vocational interests across Japanese and American culture. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44, 346–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tranberg, M., Slane, S., & Ekeberg, S. E. (1993). The relation between interest congruence and satisfaction: A metaanalysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42, 253–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Watson, M., Duarte, M. E., & Glavin, K. (2005). Cross-cultural perspectives on career assessment. Career Development Quarterly, 54, 29–35.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Terence J. G. Tracey
    • 1
  • Saurabh Gupta
    • 1
  1. 1.Arizona State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations