Skip to main content

Human Welfare and the Future of the World Trade Organization: Rethinking the International Institutional Architecture

  • Chapter
  • 2336 Accesses

The 2004 report of the Consultative Board to the Director-General of the World Trade Organization (WTO), entitled The Future of the WTO, was bullish regarding the correlation between trade liberalization and human well-being: It is argued by some that freer trade is being pursued for its own sake and, instead, should be judged in terms of its impact in the quality of human life. In fact, the case for freeing trade is made very definitely in terms of enhancing human welfare – nowhere better than in the preamble to the Marrakesh Agreement that established the WTO.

Keywords

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • B. Bosanquet (1923), The Philosophical Theory of the State (London: MacMillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Carlyle (1971), ‘Chartism’, in T. Carlyle, Selected Writings (ed. A. Shelston) (Harmondsworth: Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • G.D.H. Cole (1920a), Social Theory (London: Methuen).

    Google Scholar 

  • G.D.H. Cole (1920b), Guild Socialism Re-stated (London: Leonard Parsons).

    Google Scholar 

  • Consultative Board (2004), The Future of the WTO: Addressing institutional Challenges in the New Millennium (Geneva: World Trade Organization).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Dworkin (2000), Sovereign Virtue. The theory andPpractice of Equality (London: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • G.W.F. Hegel (1991), Elements of the Philosophy of Right (ed. A. Wood) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Hesse (1965), Steppenwolf (trans. B. Creighton) (Harmondsworth: Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Hirst (1993), ‘Associational Democracy’, in D. Held (ed.), Prospect for Democracy (Cambridge: Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Hirst (1994), Associative Democracy. New Forms of Economic and Social Governance (Cambridge: Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Jackson (1990), Quasi-states: Sovereignty, International Relations and the Third World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Lenter (2004), Power and Politics in Globalization: The Indispensable State (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • A. MacIntyre (1985), After Virtue (London: Duckworth).

    Google Scholar 

  • A. MacIntyre (1999), Dependent Rational Animals. Why Human Beings Need the Virtues (London: Duckworth).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Michels (1959), Political Parties. A Sociological Study of the Oligarchic Tendencies of Modern Democracy (trans. E and C. Paul) (New York: Dover).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Morris (2005), ‘Normative Innovation and the Great Powers’, in A. Bellamy (ed.), International Society and Its Critics (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Ougaard (2004), Political Globalization: State, Power and Social Forces (Houndsmill: Palgrave).

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Parekh (2000), Rethinking Multiculturalism (Houndsmill: MacMillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Rawls (1972), A Theory of Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Rawls (1993), Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Rawls (1999), Law of Peoples and ‘The Idea of Public Reason Revisited’ (London: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Rawls (2001), Justice as Fairness: A restatement (London: Belknap Harvard).

    Google Scholar 

  • J.-J. Rousseau (1984), Discourse on Inequality (trans. M. Cranston) (Harmondsworth: Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Runciman (1997), Pluralism and the Personality of the State (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Saharso (2000), ‘Female Autonomy and Cultural Imperative: Two Hearts beating Together’, in W. Kymlicka and W. Norman (eds.), Citizenship in Diverse Societies (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Sen (1985), ‘Well-being, Agency and Freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984’, Journal of Philosophy, 82, 4, 169–221.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • A. Sen (1993), ‘Capability and Well-being’, in M. Nausbaum and A. Sen (eds.), The Quality of Life (Oxford: Clarendon).

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Sen (1999), Development as Freedom (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Taylor (1994), ‘The Politics of Recognition’, in A. Gutmann (ed.), Multiculturalism: Examining the politics of recognition (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Tully (1995), Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Tyler (2004), ‘Strangers and Compatriots: The Political Theory of Cultural Diversity’, in J. Rex and G. Singh (eds.), Governance in Multicultural Societies (Aldershot: Ashgate).

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Tyler (2006), Idealist Political Philosophy: Pluralism and conflict in the absolute idealist tradition (London & New York, NY: Continuum).

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Tyler (2007a), ‘“History’s Actors”? Insights into the “war on terror” from international relations theory’, in M. Mullard and B. Cole (eds.), Globalisation, Citizenship and War on Terror (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Tyler (2007b), ‘Citizenship, Rights and Tony Blair’s Doctrine of International Community’, in M. Mullard and B. Cole (eds.), Globalisation, Citizenship and War on Terror (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Walzer (1983), Spheres of Justice: A Defence of Pluralism and Equality (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Walzer (1987), Interpretation and Social Criticism (London: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Walzer (1993), ‘Objectivity and Social Meaning’, in M. Nausbaum and A. Sen (eds.), The Quality of Life (Oxford: Clarendon).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tyler, C. (2007). Human Welfare and the Future of the World Trade Organization: Rethinking the International Institutional Architecture. In: Lee, S., Mcbride, S. (eds) Neo-Liberalism, State Power and Global Governance. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6220-9_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics