Advertisement

Influence of Coriolis forces on turbidity currents and sediment deposition

  • M. G. Wells
Part of the ERCOFTAC Series book series (ERCO, volume 11)

Abstract

Using laboratory analogue experiments I show how the Earth’s rotation can influence the deposition patterns of large-scale turbidity currents. While it has been previously recognized that the EarthÕs rotation can influence the trajectories of turbidity currents (Middleton 1993; Huppert 1998; Kneller & Buckee, 2000) the experiments discussed in this paper represent the first systematic laboratory study of the Coriolis forces acting upon turbidity currents. The scale at which Coriolis forces become important is best expressed using the Rossby number, defined as Ro = U/fL, where U is a depth averaged velocity, L the length scale and the Coriolis frequency, f, is defined by f = 2Ω sin θ, where Ω is the Earth’s rotation rate and θ is the latitude. Coriolis forces will dominate a current when Ro < 1 (Nof 1996). For example a large turbidity current with a velocity of U = 10m s−1 at a latitude of 45° North where f = 1 × 10− 4 s −1, has Ro < 1 for length scales greater than 100 km.

In this paper I discuss two effects of the Coriolis forces upon large-scale turbidity currents. The first series of experiments document how an increase in the Coriolis parameter resulted in a decrease in the rate of turbulent entrainment of overlying sea-water into a density current. The second set of experiments look at the maximum radius of deposition of a turbidity current on a flat plane, and we find that the resulting radius is inversely proportional to the Coriolis parameter. This result implies that there may be a latitudinal dependence upon the radius of turbidite deposition on the flat oceanic abyssal plane. I compare the scaling developed from these idealized laboratory models to field observations of the 300–500 km spatial extent of the turbidites arising during the 1929 Grand Banks earthquake. By making estimates of the velocity we find that this turbidity current had Ro ∼ 1, so that Coriolis forces may have limited the spatial extent of the resulting turbidite.

Keywords

Froude Number Coriolis Force Gravity Current Turbidity Current Coriolis Parameter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Alavian, V. (1986) Behavior of density currents on an incline. J. Hydraulic Eng. 112:27–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Cenedese, C., Whitehead, J.A., Ascarelli, T.A. & Ohiwa, M. (2004) A dense current flowing down a sloping bottom in a rotating fluid. J. Phys. Oceanog. 34:188–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Dallimore, C.J., Imberger J., & Ishikawa, T. (2001) Entrainment and turbulence in saline underflow in Lake Ogawara. J. Hydraul. Eng. 127:937–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Davies, P.A., Wahlin, A.K. & Guo, Y. (2006) Laboratory and analytical model studies of the Faroe Bank Channel deep-water outflow. J. Phys. Ocean. 36:1348–1364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Ellison, T.H. & Turner, J.S. (1959) Turbulent entrainment in stratified flows. J. Fluid Mech. 6:423–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Emms, P.W. (1999) On the ignition of geostrophically rotating turbidity currents. Sedimentology 46:1049–1063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Etling, D., Gelhardt, F., Schrader, U., Brennecke, F., Kuhn, G., Chabert d’Hieres, G. & Didelle, H. (2000) Experiments with density currents on a sloping bottom in a rotating fluid. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans. 31:139–164Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Griffths, R.A. (1986) Gravity currents in rotating systems. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 18:59–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Hallworth, M.A., Huppert, H.E. & Ungarsish, M. (2001) Axisymmetric gravity currents in a rotating system: experimental and numerical investigations. J. Fluid Mech. 447:1–29Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Heezen, B.C. & Ewing, M. (1952) Turbidity currents and submarine slumps, and the 1929 Grand Banks earthquake. Am. J. Sci. 12:849–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Hogg, A.J., Ungarish, M. & Huppert, H.E. (2001) Effects of particle sedimentation and rotation on axisymmetric gravity currents. Phys. Fluids 13:3687–3698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Horner-Devine, A.R., Fong, D.A., Monismith, S.G. & Maxworthy, T. (2006) Laboratory experiments simulating a coastal river inflow. J. Fluid Mech. 555:203–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Huppert, H.E. (1998) Quantitative modelling of granular suspension flows. Proc. Royal Soc. 356:2471–2496Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Jacobs, P. & Ivey, G.N. (1998) The influence of rotation on shelf convection. J. Fluid Mech. 369:23–48Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Kneller, B. & Buckee, C. (2000) The structure and fluid mechanics of turbidity currents: a review of some recent studies and their geological implications. Sedimentology 47:62–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Middleton, G.V. (1993) Sediment deposition from turbidity currents. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 21:89–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Nof, D. (1996) Rotational turbidity flows and the 1929 Grand Banks earthquake. Deep Sea Res. 43:1143–1163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Parker, G., Fukushima, Y. & Pantin, H.M. (1986) Self-accelerating turbidity currents. J. Fluid Mech. 171:145–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Piper, D.J.W., Shor, A.N., Far’re, J.A., O’Connell, S. & Jacobi, R. (1985) Sediment slides and turbidity currents on the Laurentian Fan; sidescan sonar investigations near the epicentre of the 1929 Grand Banks earthquake. Geology 13:538–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Price, J.F. & Baringer, M.O. (1993) Outflows and deep water production by marginal seas. Prog. Ocean. 33:161–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Princevac, M., Fernando, H.J.H. & Whiteman, C.D. (2005) Turbulent entrainment into natural gravity driven flows. J. Fluid. Mech. 533:259–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Shapiro, G.I. & Zatsepin, A.G. (1997) Gravity current down a steeply inclined slope in a rotating fluid. Ann. Geophysicae 15:366–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Turner, J.S. (1986) Turbulent entrainment—the developement of the entrainment assumption and its application to geophysical flows. J. Fluid. Mech. 173:431–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Ungarish, M. & Huppert, H.E. (1999) Simple models of Coriolisin influenced axisymmetric particle-driven gravity currents. Int. J. Multi. Flow 25:715–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Wells, M.G. & Wettlaufer, J.S. (2005) Two-dimensional density currents in a confined basin. Geophys. Astro. Fluid Dyn. 99:199–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Wells, M.G. & Wettlaufer, J.S. (2006) The long-term circulation driven by density currents in a two-layer stratified basin. J. Fluid. Mech. (accepted)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. G. Wells
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physical and Environmental SciencesUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations