Traditional classifications of control distinguish two types: obligatory control (OC) and non-obligatory control (NOC). Recently, it has been demonstrated that OC should also be divided into two types: exhaustive and partial control (cf. Landau 2000). This more refined view of OC is taken to be evidence against the movement theory of control (MTC – cf. Hornstein 2001), the argument being that partially controlled PRO does not behave like a trace. In this paper, I contribute to advancing our understanding of control by looking at agreement and flotation in control configurations and developing an analysis for partial control that results from movement plus stranding.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rodrigues, C. (2007). Agreement and Flotation in Partial and Inverse Partial Control Configurations. In: Davies, W.D., Dubinsky, S. (eds) New Horizons in the Analysis of Control and Raising. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol 71. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6176-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6176-9_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6175-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6176-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)