Ambrose, D. (2006). From the editor’s desk. Roeper Review, 28, 2, 60–61.
Assouline, S. G., Colangelo, N., Lupkowski-Shoplik, A. E., Lipscomb, J., & Forstadt, L. (2003). The Iowa acceleration scale (2nd ed.). Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago, IL: Open Court.
Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York: Ballantine.
Bloomberg, M. (2005, January). 2005 State of the city address. Retrieved August 28, 2006, from http://www.gothamgazette.com/article/searchlight/20050111/203/1243
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Borland, J. H. (2003). Evaluating gifted programs: A broader perspective. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp.293–310). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Bracken, B. A., & Brown, E. F. (2006) Behavioral identification and assessment of gifted andtalented students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 24(2), 112–122.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Brown, E., Avery, L., VanTassel-Baska, J., Worley, B., & Stambaugh, T. (2006). A Five-State analysis of gifted education policy. Roeper Review, 29(1), 11–23.
Callahan, C. M. (2000). Evaluation as a critical component of program development and implementation. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp.537–547). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
Callahan, C. M. (2003). Searching for answers or creating more questions? A response to Robinson. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 26, 274–282.
Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G., & Gross, M. U. M. (2004). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students. Iowa City, IO: The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.
Committee on Education and the Law. (2003, Spring). Ending discrimination in gifted education in the New York City public schools. The Record, 58(2), 174–202.
Council for Exceptional Children. (2003). What every special educator must know: Ethics, standards, and guidelines for special educators (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
Dai, D. Y. (2009). Essential tensions in conceptions of giftedness: A historical-dialectical perspective. In L. Shavinina (Ed.), Handbook of gifted education. Springer.
Dai, D. Y., & Renzulli, J. S. (2008). Snowflakes, living systems, and the mystery of giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly.
Dobbs, D. (2006, September). How to be a genius. New Scientist, 2569, 40–43.
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House.
Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. J., Hoffman, R. J. (2006). The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ford, D. Y. (2003a). Desegregating gifted education: Seeking equity for culturally diverse students. In J. H. Borland (Ed.), Rethinking gifted education (pp.143–158). New York: Teachers College Press.
Ford, D. Y. (2003b). Two other wrongs don’t make a right: Sacrificing the needs of diverse students does not solve gifted education’s unresolved problems. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 26, 283–291.
Fruchter, N., & Siegel, D. (2004, November 28). Point/counterpoint: Are gifted programs good? No. The Daily News, p.46.
Fullan, M. G. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
Goodwin, M. (2006, March 19). Smart kids need not apply. New York Daily News. p.33.
Gottfried, A., Gottfried, A. E., & Guerin, D. W. (in press). Issues in early prediction and identification of intellectual giftedness. In F. D. Horowitz, R. F. Subotnik, & D. J. Matthews (Eds.), The development of giftedness and talent: A life-span perspective. Washington: APA Publications.
Herszenhorn, D. (2005, October 22). Under siege on schools, mayor pledges new programs. New York Times, p. B2.
Horowitz, F. D. (1987). A developmental view of giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31(4), 165–168.
Horowitz, F. D., & O’Brien, M. (Eds.). (1985). The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Horowitz, F. D., Subotnik, R. F., & Matthews, D. J. (in progress). The development of giftedness and talent across the life-span. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Howe, M. J. A. (1990). The origins of exceptional abilities. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
Hughes, C. E., & Murawski, W. A. (2001). Lessons from another field: Applying co-teaching strategies to gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 45(3), 195–204.
Kandel, E. R., Schwartz, J. H., & Jessel, T. M. (2000). Principles of neural science (4th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
Keating, D. P. (1991). Curriculum options for the developmentally advanced. Exceptionality Education Canada, 1, 53–83.
Keating, D. P. (in press). Developmental science and giftedness: An integrated life-span perspective. In F. D. Horowitz, R. F. Subotnik, & D. J. Matthews (Eds.), Developmental approaches to giftedness. Washington: APA.
Kirschenbaum, R. J., Armstrong, D. C., & Landrum, M. S. (1999). Resource consultation model in gifted education to support talent development in today’s inclusive schools. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43, 39–47.
Landrum, M. (2001). Resource consultation and collaboration in gifted education. Psychology in the Schools, 38(5), 457–465.
Levy, J. (2005, February 17). Concern spreads on gifted programs. New York Sun (p.6).
Lichtman, M. (2006). Qualitative research in education: A user’s guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lohman, D. F. (2005). An aptitude perspective on talent: Implications for identification of academically gifted minority students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 333–360.
Lohman, D. F. (2006). Beliefs about differences between ability and accomplishment: From folk theories to cognitive science. Roeper Review, 29, 32–40.
London Gifted and Talented. (2006). London gifted and talented: Realizing our city’s potential. Retrieved August 30, 2006, from http://www.londongt.org/homepages/index.php
Matthews, D. J. (2004, November). Point/counterpoint. Are gifted programs good? Yes. New York Daily News.
Matthews, D. J., & Foster, J. (2005a). A dynamic scaffolding model of teacher development: The gifted education consultant as catalyst for change. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(3), 222–230.
Matthews, D. J., & Foster, J. F. (2005b). Being smart about gifted children: A guidebook for parents and educators. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
Matthews, D. J., & Foster, J. F. (2006). Mystery to mastery: Shifting paradigms in gifted education. Roeper Review, 28(2), 64–69.
Matthews, D. J., Foster, J. F., Gladstone, D., Schieck, J., & Meiners, J. (2007). Supporting professionalism, diversity, and context within a Consultation, collaborative approach to gifted education. Journal of Educational and Psychological, 17, 315–334.
Matthews, D. J., & Keating, D. P. (1995). Domain specificity and habits of mind: An investigation of patterns of high-level development. Journal of Early Adolescence, 15, 319–343.
Matthews, D. J., & Kitchen, J. (2007a). Allowing idiosyncratic learners to thrive: Policy implications of a study of school-within-a-school gifted programs. Journal of School Choice, 1, 4, 27–53.
Matthews, D. J., & Kitchen, J. (2007b). School-within-a-school gifted programs: Perceptions of students and teachers in public secondary schools. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 3, 256–271.
National Association for Gifted Children. (2006). CEC-NAGC Initial knowledge and skill standards for gifted and talented education. Retrieved August 28, 2006, from http://www.nagc.org/uploadedFiles/Information_and_Resources/NCATE_standards/final%20initial%20standards%20(4.14.06).pdf
Nelson, C. A. (1999). Neural plasticity and human development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 42–45.
New York City Department of Education. (2006a). Gifted/talented & enrichment. Retrieved Augus t 19, 2006, from http://schools.nyc.gov/Offices/TeachLearn/OfficeCurriculumProfessionalDevelopment/GiftedTalented/default.htm
New York City Department of Education. (2006b). New York City Department of Education Continuum of Programs/Services for Gifted & Talented. Retrieved August 19, 2006, from http://schools.nyc.gov/Offices/TeachLearn/OfficeCurriculumProfessionalDevelopment/GiftedTalented/Programs/default.htm
New York State Education Department. (2003). New York State teacher certification examinations preparation guide gifted education content specialty test (64). Amherst MA: National Evaluation Systems.
New York State Education Department. (2005). Regulations of the commissioner of education:
Registration of Curricula. Retrieved August 29, 2006, from http://www.highered.nysed.gov/tcert/part52.21.htm
Oreck, B. A., Owen, S. V., & Baum, S. M. (2003). Validity, reliability, and equity issues in an observational talent assessment process in the performing arts. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27(1), 62–94.
Plucker, J. A., & Barab, S. A. (2005). The importance of contexts in theories of giftedness: Learning to embrace the messy joys of subjectivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 201–216). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse And Revival Of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Ragin, C. C., & Becker, H. S. (1992). What is a case? Exploring the foundations of social inquiry. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Reis, S. M. (2005). Feminist perspectives on talent development. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp.217–245). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Renzulli, J. S. (2002). Expanding the conception of giftedness to include co-cognitive traits and to promote social capital. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(1), 33–58.
Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (2003). The schoolwide enrichment model: Developing creative and productive giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp.184–203). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Rothstein, R. (2004). Class and schools: Using social, economic and educational reform to close the black-white achievement gap. New York: Teachers College Press.
Rothstein, R. (2006, January). Review of Equity and excellence in American higher education, by William G. Bowen, Martin A. Kurzweil, & Eugene M. Tobin (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2005). Academe. Retrieved March 24, 2006, from http://www.epi.org/content.cfm/webfeatures_viewpoints_equity_and_excellence
Schwartz, R. (2005, January 13). Mike’s gift for kids: Finally, programs for city’s gifted get a deserved boost. New York Daily News.
Shonkoff, J. P., & Phillips, D. A. (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early childhood development. Washington: National Academy Press.
Simonton, D. K. (1994). Greatness: Who makes history and why. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Splitter, L. (2006). Philosophy in a crowded curriculum. In H. W. Kam (Ed.), Philosophy in schools: Developing a community of inquiry: Report on the proceedings of the conference (pp.56–65). Singapore: Singapore Teachers Union.
Splitter, L. (2007). Delving ever deeper: Gifted students and philosophy. Gifted Education International, 22(2/3), 207–217.
Subotnik, R. F., & Calderon, J. (2008). Developing giftedness and talent. In F. Karnes & K. Stephens (Eds.), Achieving excellence: Educating the gifted and talented (pp.49–61). Columbus, OH: Pearson Education Inc.
Subotnik, R. F., & Jarvin, L. (2005). Beyond expertise: Conceptions of giftedness as great performance. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (3rd ed., 343–357). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Arnold, K. D. (2003). Beyond Bloom: Revisiting environmental factors that enhance or impede talent development. In J. H. Borland (Ed.), Rethinking gifted education (pp.227–238). New York: Teachers College Press.
Subotnik, R. F., Worrell, F. C., & Matthews, D. J. (August, 2006). The development of giftedness and talent across the life-span. Symposium presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, New Orleans.
Tannenbaum, A. J. (1983). Gifted children: Psychological and educational perspectives. New York: Macmillan.
Tannenbaum, A. J. (2003). Nature and nurture of giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp.45–59). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
VanTassel-Baska, J. (2005). Gifted programs and services: What are the non-negotiables? Theory into practice, 44(2), 90–97. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.
VanTassel-Baska, J., & Stambaugh, T. (2006). Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Westberg, K. L., Archambault, F. X., Dobyns, S. M., & Slavin, T. J. (1993). An observational study of instructional and curricular practices used with gifted and talented students. National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
Wolf, A. (2006, August 25). Why we’re losing ground. New York Sun, p.9.
Worrell, F. C. (2003). Why are there so few African Americans in gifted programs? In C. C Yeakey & R. D. Henderson (Eds.), Surmounting the odds: Education, opportunity, and society in the new millennium (pp.423–454). Greenwich, CT: Information Age, Inc.
Worrell, F. C. (in press). What does gifted mean? Personal and social identity perspectives on Giftedness in adolescence. In F. D. Horowitz, R. F. Subotnik, & D. J. Matthews (Eds.), The development of giftedness and talent: A life-span perspective. Washington: American Psychological Association.