Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Measurement of Giftedness

  • Chapter
International Handbook on Giftedness

Abstract

Instruments with the richest loadings on general intelligence (g) are the most useful for locating gifted children. Spearman’s g represents giftedness. Raven’s Progressive Matrices, Stanford-Binet scales, and Wechsler scales are the most widely used IQ tests in selecting gifted children worldwide. All were founded on the conception of intelligence as abstract reasoning (g), but each may locate a different group of gifted children. If index scores vary significantly, Full Scale IQ scores should not be derived. The new General Ability Index (GAI) of the WISC-IV, based on only six subtests, is recommended by the NAGC Task Force for selection of students for gifted programs. The Verbal Comprehension Index and Perceptual Reasoning Index can also be used independently, as can the Verbal and Nonverbal IQ scores of the SB5. Ratio IQ methods and supplementary testing are recommended for locating exceptionally gifted children and for determining degree of acceleration needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 669.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anastasi, A. (1988). Psychological testing (6th ed.). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannatyne, A. (1974). Diagnosis: A note on recategorization of the WISC scaled scores. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 7, 272–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayley, N. (1970). Development of mental abilities. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael’s manual of child psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 1). New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benbow, C. P., & Lubinski, D. (2006). Julian C. Stanley, Jr. (1918–2005). American Psychologist, 61, 251–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binet, A. (1909). Les idees modernes sur les enfants. Paris: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binet, A. (1911). Nouvelles recherches sur la mesure du niveau intellectual chez les enfants d’ecole. L’Annee Psychologique, 17, 145–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binet, A., & Simon, Th. (1905). Application des methods nouvelle au diagnostic du niveau intellectual chez des enfants normaux et anormaux d’hospice et d’ecole primaire. L’Annee Psychologique, 11, 191–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binet, A., & Simon, Th. (1908). Le developpement de l’intelligence chez les enfants. L’Annee Psychologique, 14, 1–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, C. (1949). The structure of the mind: A review of the results of factor analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 19, 100–111; 176–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canter, A. (1990). A new Binet, an old premise: A mismatch between technology and evolving practice. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 8, 443–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, D. & Roid, G. (2004). Acceptable use of the Stanford-Binet Form L-M: Guidelines for the professional use of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, Third Edition (Form L-M). Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, J. M. (1890). Mental tests and measurements. Mind, 15, 373–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, J. M. (1915). Families of American men of science. Popular Science Monthly, 86, 504–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. (1963). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. (1971). Abilities: Their structure, growth, and action. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1970). Essentials of psychological testing (3rd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuBois, P. H. (1970). A history of psychological testing. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, R. F., Silverman, L K., & Moran, D. (2004, November). Using two WISC-IV indices to identify the gifted. Paper presented at the 51st Annual Convention of the National Association for Gifted Children, Salt Lake City, UT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, D. P., & Kaufman, A. S. (2004). Essentials of WISC-IV assessment. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, J. R. (1984). The mean IQ of Americans: Massive gains 1932 to 1978. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 29–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, J. R. (1999). Searching for justice: The discovery of IQ gains over time. American Psychologist, 54, 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, J. R. (2006). Tethering the elephant: Capital cases, IQ, and the Flynn effect. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 12, 170–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its causes and consequences. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, F. (1883). Inquiries into human faculty and its development. London: J. M. Dent & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. G. (1983). Frames of mind: A theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilman, B. (2008). Challenging highly gifted learners. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilman, B. J., & Falk, R. F. (2005, August). Research-based guidelines for use of the WISC-IV in gifted assessment. Paper presented at the 16th Biennial Conference of the World Council for Gifted and Talented Children, New Orlean, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilman, B. J., & Kearney, K. (2004, November). From conceptual to practical: Making gifted testing relevant. Paper presented at the 51st annual convention of the National Association for Gifted Children, Salt Lake City, UT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, H. H. (1910). A measuring scale of intelligence. Training School, 6, 146–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, U. M. (2004). Exceptionally gifted children. (2nd ed.). London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 267–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1988). Some changes in the structure-of intellect model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildreth, G. H. (1966). Introduction to the gifted. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, J. L. (1988). Thinking about human abilities. In J. R. Nesselroade & R. B. Cattell (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (2nd ed., pp. 645–685). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, J. L., & Cattell, R. B. (1966). Refinement and test of the theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 57, 253–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, A. S. (1992). Evaluation of the WISC-III and WPPSI-R for gifted children. Roeper Review, 14, 154–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, A. S. (1993). King WISC the third assumes the throne. Journal of School Psychology, 31, 345–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, A. S. (1994). Intelligent testing with the WISC-III. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, K., & LeBlanc, J. (1993). Forgotten pioneers in the study of gifted African-Americans. Roeper Review, 15, 192–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovecky, D. V., Kearney, K., Falk, R. F., & Gilman, B. J. (2005, August). A comparison of the Stanford-Binet 5 and the Stanford-Binet Form L-M in the assessment of gifted children. Paper presented at the 16th Biennial Conference of the World Council for Gifted and Talented Children, New Orleans, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubin, B., Wallis, R. R., & Paine, C. (1971). Patterns of psychological test usage in the United States: 1935 – 1969. Professional Psychology, 2, 70–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matarazzo, J. D. (1981). David Wechsler (1896–1981). American Psychologist, 36, 1542–1543.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrew, K. S. (1997). Analysis of the major intelligence batteries according to a proposed comprehensive Gf-Gc framework. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 151–179). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrew, K. S. (2007). Cattell-Horn-Carroll CHC (Gf-Gc) theory: Past, present & future. 6.1 A. Conclusions and caveats. Institute for Applied Psychometrics. (Retrieved from http://www.iapsych.com/CHCPP/A.ConclusionsandCaveats.html on January 25, 2007)

  • National Association for Gifted Children (Jan. 2008). Use of the WISC-IV for gifted identification. Retrieved January 23, 2008, from http://www.nagc.org/index.aspx?id=375

  • Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, J. C. (1938). Progressive Matrices. London: H. K. Lewis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, J. C. (1958). Standard Progressive Matrices (Revised): Sets A, B, C, D, & E. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, J. C. (1959). A note on Burt’s “The distribution of intelligence.” British Journal of Psychology, 47, 95–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, J. C. (1965). Guide to using The Coloured Progressive Matrices: Sets A, Ab, B. London: H. K. Lewis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, J. (1981). The 1979 British standardization of the Standard Progressive Matrices and Mill Hill Vocabulary Scale. Research Supplement No. 1 to the manual for Raven’s Progressive Matrices and vocabulary scales. London: H. K. Lewis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, J. (1983a). The Progressive Matrices and Mill Hill Vocabulary Scale in Western societies. In S. H. Irvine & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Human assessment and cultural factors (pp. 107–114). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, J. (1983b). Raven Coloured Progressive Matrices Intelligence Test in Thailand and in Denmark: A response. School Psychology International, 4, 173–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (1998). Manual for Raven’s Advanced Progressive Matrices (1998 edition). Oxford, England: Oxford Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, J., & Summers, B. (1986). Manual for Raven’s Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales—Research supplement no. 3. London: H. K. Lewis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reams, R., Chamrad, D., & Robinson, N. M. (1990). The race is not necessarily to the swift: Validity of the WISC-R bonus points for speed. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34, 108–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, C. C., & Anderson, R. P. (1965). A tactual form of the Progressive Matrices for use with blind children. Personnel & Guidance Journal, 43, 912–929.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimm, S. (2006, November). Breaking the ceiling scores for profoundly gifted children using the WISC-IV. Paper presented at the 53rd annual convention of the National Association of Gifted Children, Charlotte, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimm, S., Gilman, B. J., & Silverman, L. K. (2008). Non-traditional applications of traditional testing. In J. VanTassel-Baska (Ed.), Alternative assessments with gifted and talented students (pp. 175–202). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, H. B. (1981). The uncommonly bright child. In M. Lewis & L. A. Rosenblum (Eds.), The uncommon child (pp. 57–81). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roid, G. H. (2003a). Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, Fifth Edition, Technical Manual. Itasca, IL: Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roid, G. H. (2003b). Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales interpretive manual: Expanded guide to the interpretation of SB5 test results. Itasca, IL: Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roid, G. H., & Barram, R. A. (2004). Essentials of Stanford-Binet (SB5) assessment. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roid, G. H., & Carson, A. (2003). Special composite scores for the SB5. Assessment Service Bulletin No. 4. Itasca, IL: Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruf, D. L. (2003). Use of the SB5 in the assessment of high abilities. Assessment Service Bulletin No. 3. Itasca, IL: Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seagoe, M. V. (1975). Terman and the gifted. Los Altos, CA: William Kaufman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, S. E. (1899). Individual psychology: A study in psychological method, American Journal of Psychology, 10, 329–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shouksmith, G. (1970). Intelligence, creativity and cognitive style. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, L. K. (1986). An interview with Elizabeth Hagen: Giftedness, intelligence and the new Stanford-Binet. Roeper Review, 8, 168–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, L. K. (1993a). A developmental model for counseling the gifted. In L. K. Silverman (Ed.), Counseling the gifted & talented (pp. 51–78). Denver: Love.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, L. K. (1993b). The gifted individual. In L. K. Silverman (Ed.), Counseling the gifted & talented (pp. 3–28). Denver: Love.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, L. K. (1995). Highly gifted children. In J. Genshaft, M. Bireley, & C. L. Hollinger (Eds.), Serving gifted and talented students: A resource for school personnel (pp. 217–240). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, L. K. (1998). Through the lens of giftedness. Roeper Review, 20, 204–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, L. K. (2000). The two-edged sword of compensation: How the gifted cope with learning disabilities. In K. Kay (Ed.). Uniquely gifted: Identifying and meeting the needs of twice exceptional learners (pp. 153–159). Gilsum, NH: Avocus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, L. K. (2001). Diagnosing and treating visual perceptual issues in gifted children. Journal of Optometric Vision Development, 32(3), 153–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, L. K. (2002). Upside-down brilliance: The visual-spatial learner. Denver: DeLeon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, L. K. (2003). Gifted children with learning disabilities. In N. Colangelo & G. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 553 – 543). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, L. K., Gilman, B. J., & Falk, R. F. (2004, November). Who are the gifted using the new WISC-IV? Paper presented at the 51st annual convention of the National Association for Gifted Children, Salt Lake City, UT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, L. K. & Kearney, K. (1992). Don’t throw away the old Binet, Understanding Our Gifted, 4(4), 1, 8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, L. K., & Kearney, K. (1989). Parents of the extraordinarily gifted. Advanced Development, 1, 41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyderman, M., & Rothman, S. (1988). The IQ controversy, the media and public policy. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, C. E. (1904). “General intelligence”: Objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, C. E. (1923). The nature of intelligence and the principles of cognition. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, C. E. (1927). The abilities of man. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, J. C. (1990). Leta Hollingworth’s contributions to above-level testing of the gifted. Roeper Review, 12(3), 166–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, W. (1910). Das ubernormal kind. Der Saemann, 67–72. [Translated and reprinted in 1911 as The supernormal child. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2, 143–148, 181–190.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Teasdale, T. W., & Owen. D. R. (2005). A long-term rise and recent decline in intelligence test performance: The Flynn Effect in reverse. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 837 – 843.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L. M. (1916a). The measurement of intelligence. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L. M., (1916b). The Stanford revision of the Binet-Simon tests. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L. M. (1917). The intelligence quotient of Francis Galton in childhood. American Journal of Psychology, 28, 209–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L. M. (1921). In E. L. Thorndike, et al. Intelligence and its measurement: A symposium. Journal of Educational Psychology, 12, 127–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L. M. (1925). Genetic studies of genius, Vol. 1: Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L. M., & Merrill, M. A. (1937). Measuring intelligence: A guide to the administration of the new revised Stanford-Binet tests of intelligence. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L. M., & Merrill, M. A. (1960). Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Manual for the third revision. Form L-M. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L. M., & Merrill, M. A. (1973). The Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: 1973 norms edition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terrassier, J-C. (1985). Dyssynchrony-uneven development. In J. Freeman (Ed.). The psychology of gifted children (pp. 265–274). New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E. L. (1941). Mental abilities. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society Symposium on Recent Advances in Psychology, 84, 503–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, R. L. (1975). Mr. Binet’s test 70 years later. Educational Researcher, 4, 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, R. L. (1986). Historical and theoretical perspectives. In R. L. Thorndike, E. P. Hagen, & J. M. Sattler (1986). The Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth edition. Technical manual (pp. 1–7). Itasca, IL: Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, R. L., & Hagen, E. P. (1971). Cognitive Abilities Test. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, R. L., Hagen, E. P., & Sattler, J. M. (1986). The Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth edition. Technical manual. Itasca, IL: Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Psychometric Monographs, No. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, P. E. (1951). The structure of human abilities. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, P. E. (1987). The demise of the Stanford-Binet scale. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 28(3), 251–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, J. D. (2003). Assessment of intellectual functioning. In J. R. Graham & J. A. Naglieri (Eds.), Handbook of psychology, Volume 10: Assessment psychology (pp. 417–442). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, J. D. (2005, November). Utility of nonverbal measures with the gifted. Paper presented at the 16th Biennial Conference of the World Council for Gifted and Talented Children, New Orleans, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, J. D. (2006). Tips for parents: Intellectual assessment of exceptionally and profoundly gifted children. Unpublished manuscript available online at http://www.gt-cybersource.org/Record.aspx?NavID=2_0&rid=14107

  • Wasserman, J. D. (2007a). The Flynn effect in gifted samples: Status as of 2007. Unpublished manuscript available online at http://www.gifteddevelopment.com/Whats_New/flynn.htm

  • Wasserman, J. D. (2007b). Intellectual assessment of exceptionally and profoundly gifted children. In K. Kay, D. Robson, & J. F. Brenneman (Eds.), High IQ kids: Collected insights, information and personal stories from the experts (pp. 48–65). Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt, D. C. (1998, January). Lionel Penrose, F. R. S. (1898–1972) and eugenics: Part One. Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London, 52(1), 137–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, R. M., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2007). Spatial ability: A neglected dimension in talent searches for intellectually precocious youth. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 397–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1939). The measurement of adult intelligence. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1949). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children Manual. New York: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1955). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Manual. New York: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1958). The measurement and appraisal of adult intelligence (4th ed.). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1967). Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence. New York: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1974). Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—revised. New York: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1981). WAIS-R manual: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Revised. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1989). Manual for the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence–Revised. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1991). Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Third Edition. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1999). Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (2003). The WISC-IV technical and interpretive manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, L. G., Saklofske, D. H., Prifitera, A., & Holdnack, J. A. (2006). WISC-IV Advanced clinical interpretation. Burlington, MA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. M. (1992). The Stanford-Binet Fourth Edition and Form L-M in assessment of young children with mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 30(2), 81–84.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Advanced Development, Denver, CO, USA

    Linda Kreger Silverman

Authors
  1. Linda Kreger Silverman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda Kreger Silverman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Département des sciences administratives Pavillon Lucien-Brault, Université du Québec en Outaouais, 101, rue Saint-Jean-Bosco, Case postale 1250, succursale Hull, J8X 3X7, Gatineau, Québec, Canada

    Larisa V. Shavinina

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Silverman, L.K. (2009). The Measurement of Giftedness. In: Shavinina, L.V. (eds) International Handbook on Giftedness. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6162-2_48

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation