Skip to main content

Multiple Giftedness in Adults: The Case of Polymaths

  • Chapter

Abstract

Creativity researchers often assert that specialization is a requirement for adult success, that skills and knowledge do not transfer across domains, and that the domain dependence of creativity makes general creativity impossible. The supposed absence of individuals who have made major contributions to multiple domains supposedly supports the specialization thesis. This chapter challenges all three legs of the specialization thesis. It describes individuals who have made major contributions to multiple domains; reviews prior literature demonstrating polymathy among creative adults; and presents data from an ongoing study of Nobel laureates in literature, science and economics that confirms this creativity–polymathy connection.

Keywords

  • Polymathy
  • Polymaths
  • Creativity
  • Specialization thesis
  • Domain dependence of creativity
  • General creativity
  • Multiple domains
  • Creative adults

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   629.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  • Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P. (1999). Dr. Minor Myers gives talk on multi-talented personalities. Elm Student Newspaper of Washington College, vol 70 (n.p.). Accessed 28 July 2006 http://elm.washcoll.edu/past/070/22/70_22min.html

  • Anonymous. 120 years of electronic music. Electronic musical instruments 1870–1990. http://www.obsolete.com/120_years. Accessed 9 Sep 2006.

  • Anonymous, (Eds). 1956. Art and the artist. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, J. (1998). The case for domain specificity in creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 173–177.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Basbanes, N. A. (1997). In focus: Preserving the creative wisdom of the past. Nicholas A. Basbanes (web blog) 2(5). Accessed 28 July 2006 http://www.nicholasbasbanes.com/

  • Bell Telephone. 1961. Music from mathematics. Selections of music composed and played by mathematicians – both human and electronic. Princeton NJ: Bell Telephone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, K. H. History of electronic and computer music, including automatic instruments and composition machines. http://eamusic.dartmouth.edu/~wowem/electronmedia/music/eamhistory.html Accessed 9 Sep 2006.

  • Calaprice, A. (Ed.). (2000). The expanded quotable Einstein. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capanna, A. 2002. Iannis Xenakis – Architect of light and sound. Nexus Network Journal, 3(2). Accessed 6 Sept 2006. http://www.nexusjournal.com/Capanna-en.html

  • Carey, S., & Spelke E. (1994). Domain specific knowledge and conceptual change. In L. A. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 169–200). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy, D. (1992). Uncertainty. The life and science of Werner Heisenberg. New York: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, W. S. (1950). Painting as a pastime. New York: Whittlesey House, McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. W. (1985). The life of Ernst Chain. Penicillin and beyond. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. A. (1987). Poet and Painter: The aesthetics of E. E. Cummings’s early work. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. N. (Ed.). (1989). Lewis Carroll: Interviews and recollections. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, C. M. (1926). The early mental traits of three hundred geniuses. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranefield, P. (1966). The philosophical and cultural interests of the biophysics movement of 1847. Journal of the History of Medicine, 21, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity. Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, E. E. (1945). Paintings and drawings of E. E. Cummings. Rochester, NY: Memorial Art Gallery of the University of Rochester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, A. S. (1985) . The art of G. K. Chesterton. Chicago: Loyola University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debye, P. (1966). ‘Peter J. W.Debye’. In: the Way of the Scientist. Interviews from the World of Science and Technology. New York: Simon and Schuster, pp. 77–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Depero, F. (1915). itManifesto of the Futurist Reconstruction of the Universe http://www.unknown.nu/futurism/reconstruction.html . Accessed 4 September 2006.

  • Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Minton, Balch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, H. (1912). Enquete de l’enseignmement mathematique sur la methode de travail des mathematiciens. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feist, G. J. (2005). Domain-specific creativity in the physical sciences. In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse (pp. 123–138). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, D. H., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Gardner H. (1994). Changing the world: A framework for the study of creativity. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabo, N. (1962). Of divers arts. Princeton, NJ: Bollingen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds: An anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham and Gandhi. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, H. E. (1984). Darwin on man: A psychological study of scientific creativity (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, H. E. (1988a) Networks of enterprise in creative scientific work. In B. Gholson, A. Houts, R. A. Neimayer, & W. Shadis (Eds.), Psychology of science and metascience. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, H. E. (1988b). The evolving systems approach to creative work. Creativity Research Journal, 1, 27–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadamard, J. (1945). The psychology of invention in the mathematical field. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, W. G., & Scull, C. (1995). J. R. R. Tolkien artist & illustrator. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handley-Read, C. (1951). The art of Wyndham Lewis. London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedstrom, P., Feuk, D., Hook, E., Lalander, A., & Soderstrom, G. (2001). Strindberg painter and photographer. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg, W. (1972). Physics and beyond. Encounters and conversations. New York: Harper Torchbooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg, W. (1974). Across the Frontiers. P. Heath, trans. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, E. N. (1983). Walther Nernst and the application of physics to chemistry. In R. Aris, H. T. Davis, & R. H. Stuewer (Eds.), Springs of scientific creativity (pp. 203–231). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiller, L. A., Jr. Archives (University at Buffalo – SUNY): http://ublib.buffalo.edu/libraries/units/music/spcoll/hiller

  • Hiller, L. A. Jr., Exhibit Summary (University at Buffalo – SUNY): http://ublib.buffalo.edu/libraries/units/music/exhibits/hillerexhibitsummary.pdf

  • Hiller, L. A., Jr. (1986). Lejaren Hiller: Computer music retrospective, 1957–1985. Mainz, W. Germany: Wergo Schallplatten.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjerter, K. G. (1986). Doubly gifted: The author as visual artist. New York: Abrams.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, R. (1988a, March). How I work as poet and scientist. The Scientist, 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, R. (1988b). The metamict state. Orlando, FL: University of Florida Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, R. (2006). The metaphor unchained. American Scientist, 94(5); 406–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K., & Coates, S. (1999). Nabokov’s blues: The scientific odyssey of a literary genius. Cambridge, MA: Zoland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katterman, L. (1999). Cluade E. Shannon. University of Michigan research. Accessed 1 August 2006. http://www.research.umich.edu/news/michgangreats/shannon.html.

  • Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2004). Hawking’s haiku, Madonna’s math: Why it is hard to be creative in every room of the house. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko, & J. L.Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 3–20). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (Eds.). (2005). Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse (pp. 313–320). Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, R. (1996). The art of George du Maurier. Aldershot, UK: Scolar Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, G. (1970). Drawings of William Blake. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, B. (2000). Derek Walcott: A Caribbean life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koestler, A. (1976). The act of creation. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitin, D. J. (2006). This is your brain on music. New York: Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liukkonen, P. (1999). Biographies prepared by Pietri Liukkonen Pegasos. Retrieved November 30, 2002 from www.kirjasto.sci.fi

  • Marter, J. (1991). Alexander Calder. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M. V. Wikipedia. Accessed 24 August 2006. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Matthews.

  • Matossian, N. 1986. Xenakis. London: Kan & Averil; New York: Taplinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, R., & Hong, E. (1993). Creative thinking and creative performance in adolescents as predictors of creative attainments in adults: A follow-up study after 18 years. In R. Subotnik & K. Arnold (Eds.), Beyond Terman: Longitudinal studies in contemporary gifted education. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, H. (1974). Insomnia or the devil at large. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moebius, P. J. (1900). Ueber die anlage zur mathetmatik. Leipzig: Barth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moszkowski, A. (1973). Conversations with Einstein. New York: Horizon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, R. E. (1967). The science of art. New York: John Day.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, M. (2003). Packing for college. National Consortium of Specialized Schools of Mathematics, Sciences & Technology Journal. Accessed 28 July 2006. http://www.iwu.edu/iwunews/Myers/paking.html

  • Myers, M. (2006) Polymaths (unpublished book manuscript).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, S. A., & Merkert J. (1985). Naum Gabo. Sixty years of constructivism. New York: Neues Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostwald, W. (1905). Kunst und wissenshcaft. Leipzig: Von Veit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostwald, W. (1906). Letters to a painter on the theory and practice of painting (H. W. Morse, Trans.). Boston: Ginn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostwald, W. (1907–1909). Psychographischen studien. Annalen der Naturphilosophie, 6–8, passim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostwald, W. (1909). Grosse maenner. Leipzig: Akademische Verlagsgesselshaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, H. (1950). G. B. S. A postscript. New York: Harper and Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, J. R. (1990). Telstar, a history. SMEC Vintage Electrics. Accessed 1 August 2006. http://www.smecc.org/john_pierce1.htm.

  • Planck, M. (1949). Scientific autobiography and other papers. Trans. Frank Gaynor. New York: Philosophical Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt, W. & Baker, R. A. (1931). The relationship of the scientific ’hunch’ to research. Journal of Chemical Education, 8, 1969–2002.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Poincare, H. (1946). The Foundations of Science, trans. G. B. Halsted. Lancaster, PA: Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pribic, R. (Ed.). (1990). Nobel laureates in literature: A biographical dictionary. New York: Garland Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramon y Cajal, S. (1951). Precepts and counsels on scientific investigation: Stimulants of the Spirit (J. M. Sanchez-Perez, Trans.). Mountain View, CA: Pacific Press Publishing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Root-Bernstein, M. M., & Root-Bernstein, R. S. (2003). Martha Graham and the Polymathic Imagination: A Case of Multiple Intelligences or Universal Tools for Thinking? Journal of Dance Education, 3, 16–27.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Root-Bernstein, R. S. (1987). Harmony and beauty in biomedical research. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, 19, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Root-Bernstein, R. S. (1996). The sciences and arts share a common creative aesthetic. In A. I. Tauber (Ed.), The elusive synthesis: Aesthetics and science (pp. 49–82). Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Root-Bernstein, R. S. (1989). Discovering: Inventing and solving problems at the frontiers of scientific knowledge. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Root-Bernstein, R. S. (2000). Art advances science. Nature, 407, 134.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Root-Bernstein, R. S. (2001a). Music, creativity, and scientific thinking. Leonardo, 34(1), 63–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Root-Bernstein, R. S. (2001b). Van’t Hoff on imagination and genius. In W. J. Hornix & S. H. W. M. Mannaerts (Eds.), Van’t Hoff and the emergence of chemical thermodynamics: Centennial of the first Nobel prize for chemistry 1901–2001. Delft: Delft University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Root-Bernstein, R. S. (2002). Aesthetic cognition. Journal of the Philosophy of Science, 16(1), 61–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Root-Bernstein, R. S. (2003). Sensual chemistry: Aesthetics as a motivation for research. Hyle: The Journal of the Philosophy of Chemistry, 9, 35–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Root-Bernstein, R. S. (2005a). Roger Sperry: ambicerebral man. Leonardo, 38, 224–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Root-Bernstein, R. S. (2005b). Desmond Morris’s two spheres. Leonardo, 38, 318–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Root-Bernstein, R. S. (2006a). Frederick Banting, painter. Leonardo, 39, 154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Root-Bernstein, R. S. (2006b). Albert Michelson, painter of light. Leonardo, 39, 232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Root-Bernstein, R. S. (2006c). Wilhelm Ostwald and the science of art. Leonardo, 39, 417–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Root-Bernstein, R. S., Bernstein, M., & Garnier, H. (1993). Identification of scientists making long-term high-impact contributions, with notes on their methods of working. Creativity Research Journal, 6, 329–343.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Root-Bernstein, R. S., Bernstein, M., & Garnier, H. (1995). Correlations between avocations, scientific style, work habits, and professional impact of scientists. Creativity Research Journal, 8,115–137.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Root-Bernstein, R. S., & Root-Bernstein, M. M. (1999). Sparks of genius: The thirteen thinking tools of the world’s most creative people. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Root-Bernstein, R. S., & Root-Bernstein, M. M. (2004). Artistic scientists and scientific artists: The link between polymathy and creativity. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko E. L., & Singer, J. L. (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 127–152). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rothenberg, A. 1979. The emerging goddess: the creative process in art, science, and other fields. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (2004). Everyone has creative potential. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko, & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 21–30). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sanford, J. (2005). Memorial Resolution: John Robinson Pierce. Standford Report Accessed 1 August 2006. http://news-service.stanford.edu/news/2005/april6/memlpierce-040605.html.

  • Schwarz, P. W. (1969). The hand and eye of the sculptor. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Raymond. (2006). Wikipedia. Accessed 9 September 2006. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raymond-Scott

  • Seagoe, M. (1975). Terman and the gifted. Los Altos, CA: W. Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbeck J., & Ricketts, E. F. (1971). Sea of Cortez. Mamaroneck, NY: Paul P. Appel. (original work published 1941).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J, Grigorenko, E., & Singer J. L. (Eds.). (2004). Creativity: From potential to realization. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szladits, L. L., & Simmonds, H. (1969). Pen & brush: The author as artist. New York: The New York Public Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolkien, C. (1992). Pictures by J. R. R. Tolkien. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdez, S. (2000). George Rickey at Maxwell Davidson. Art in America. Accessed 18 August 2006. http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1248/is_4_88/ai_61755652

  • van’t Hoff, J. H. (1878). De verbeeldingskracht in de wetenschap. Rotterdam: P. M. Bazenkijk. German ed. (1912). Die Phantasie in der Wissenschaft (E. Cohen, Trans.). In Jacobus Henricus van’t Hoff, sein leben und wirken (pp. 150–165). Leipzig: Akademsische Verlagsgesellschaft. English ed. (1967). Imagination in Science (G. F. Springer, Trans.). Molecular Biology, Biochemistry, and Biophysics, 1,1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viereck, G. E. (1929, October 26). What life means to Einstein: An interview by George Sylvester Viereck. The Saturday Evening Post, pp. 46–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walcott, D. (2000). Tiepelo’s hound. New York: Farrar, Straus, Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walcott, D. (2005). Another life: Paintings and watercolours (Exhibition catalogue) New York: NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wamser, C. C., & Wamser, C. A. (2006, May). Lejaren A. Hiller, Jr.: Computer Composition. unpublished talk, American Chemical Society, Atlanta, GA, May 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertheimer, M. (1959). Productive thinking. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. K. (1931). The versatility of genius. Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 482.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wikipedia.. Electronic musical instrument. Accessed 9 Sep 2006. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_musical_instrument

  • Wilton, A. (1990). Painting and poetry. Turner’s verse book and his work of 1804–1812. London: Tate Gallery.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xenakis, I. 1971a. Musique, architecture. Tournai: Casterman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xenakis, I. 1971b. Formalized music: Thought and mathematics in composition. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xenakis, I. 1985. Arts-sciences alloys: The thesis defense of Iannis Xenakis. S. Kanach, transl. New York: Pendragon Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Root-Bernstein .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Root-Bernstein, R. (2009). Multiple Giftedness in Adults: The Case of Polymaths. In: Shavinina, L.V. (eds) International Handbook on Giftedness. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6162-2_42

Download citation