Skip to main content

On Individual Differences in Giftedness

  • Chapter
International Handbook on Giftedness

Abstract

Psychologists have long attached great importance to the issue of individual differences, investigating, among others, abilities, intelligence, creativity, temperament, and personality. The present chapter is devoted to individual differences primarily as manifested in the effectiveness of performed actions, i.e., related to intelligence and abilities. The first part shows the positioning of the issue of giftedness in the psychology of individual differences. The second part is devoted to methodological issues and discusses the leading theories and research methods. The third part concerns the levels of individual differences, from the physiological mechanisms of the phenomenon (e.g., the use of mismatch negativity in the study of interindividual differences regarding intelligence) to manifestations of individual differences in particular fields of human activity (e.g., styles of learning or temperament). The fourth part presents an analysis of the social consequences of individual differences (i.e., identification, selection, and education). The concluding section presents trends in the development of research on individual differences in giftedness.

One of the most important ways in which psychology differs from the natural sciences arises from the existence of individual differences. Two liters of hydrogen that are treated identically respond identically, but any two human beings, even identical twins, may respond quite differently to the same stimulus. This is because people differ from one another not only in appearance (that is, physically) but also in their behavior (that is, psychologically). Hampson, S. E., Colman, A. M. (2000)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 669.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in Context. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amelang, M., & Bartussek, D. (1994). Differentielle Psychologie und Persönlichkeitsforschung. Stutgart Berlin Köln: Verlag W. Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain, S. K., Bourgeois, S. J., & Pappas, D. N. (2006). Linking theoretical models to actual practices: A survey of teachers in gifted education. Roeper Review, 4, 166–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldeweg, T., Richardson, A., Watkins, S., Foale, C., & Gruzelier, J. (1999). Impaired auditory frequency discrimination in dyslexia detected with mismatch evoked potentials. Annals of Neurology, 4, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1991). Self-regulation of motivation through anticipatory and self-reactive mechanisms. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 1991, vol. 38. Lincoln-London: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begin, J., & Gagne, F. (1994). Predictors of attitudes toward giftedness education: A review of the literature and a blueprint for future research. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 17, 161–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolig, E. E., Day, J. D. (1993). Dynamic assessment and giftedness: The promise of assessing training responsiveness. Roeper Review, 16(2), 110–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borkowski, J. G., & Peck, V. A. (1986). Causes and consequences of metamemory in gifted children. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of Giftedness, 182–222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, N. T., & Nettelbeck, T. (2003). Inspection time in the structure of cognitive ability. Intelligence, 31(3), 237–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, N. T., Nettelbeck, T., & Cooper, C. J. (2000). Event-related potential correlates of some human cognitive ability constructs. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 157–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busato, V. V., Prins, F. J., Elshout, J. J., & Hamak, C. (2000). Intellectual ability, learning style, personality, achievement motivation and academic success of psychology students in higher education. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 1057–1068.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler-Por, N. (1993). Underachieving gifted students. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International Handbook of Giftedness and Talent, 573–585. Oxford. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, M., Alexander, J., & Schwanenflugel, P. (1996). Where gifted children do and do not excel on metacognitive tasks. Directions for future research. Roeper Review, 18, 212–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, P. (1993). Metacognition and giftedness: The state of the relationship. Gifted child Quarterly, 37, 105–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheour, M., Ceponiene, R., Lehtokoski, A., Luuk, A., Allik, J., Alho, K., et al. (1998). Development of language-specific phoneme representations in the infant brain. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 351–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheour-Luhtanem, M., Alho, K., Kujala, T., Sainio, K., Reinikainen, K., Renlund, M., et al. (1995). Mismatch negativity indicates vowel discrimination in newborns. Hearing Research, 82(1), 53–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. (1997). Using action research to foster a creative response to teaching more able pupils. High Ability Studies, 8(1), 95–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, Jr., P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO-PI-R, Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, Jr., P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1998). NEO 4. Style Graph Booklet. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, C. (1926). The early mental traits of the three hundred geniuses. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyle, T. R., & Read, L. E. (1998). Giftedness and variability in strategic processing on a multitrial memory task: Evidence for stability in gifted cognition. Learning and Individual Differences, 10(4), 273–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Przeplyw: psychologia optymalnego doswiadczenia [Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Studio EMKA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Robinson, R. E. (1986). Culture, time and the development of Talent. In R. J. Sternberg, & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of Giftedness, 285–306. Cambridge- London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, J. D., & Cordon, L. A. (1993). Static and dynamic measures of ability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(1), 75–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Raad, B., & Schouwenburg, H. C. (1996). Personality in learning and education: A review. European Journal of Personality, 10, 303–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deary, I. J. (2000). Simple information and processing and intelligence: In W: R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 267–284). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delisle, J. R. (2003). The survival guide for teachers of gifted kids: How to plan, manage, and evaluate programs for gifted youth K-12. Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J., & Barrett, P. T. (1993). Brain research related to giftedness. In K. A. Haller, F. J. Mönks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 133–148). Oxford: Pergamon Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, M. W. (2004). Individual differences. normal and abnormal. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldhusen, J. F. (1986). A conception of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg, & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 112–127). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldhusen, J. F. (1992). Talent identification and development in education (TIDE). Sarasota, FL: Center for Creative Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J. (2000). Families: The essential context for gifts and talents. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 573–585). Oxford. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulkerson, J. L. (1995). A talent approach to district programming for gifted and talented youth K-12. Roeper Review, 18, 117–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., Forde, L., & Cotter, T. (1998). Personality and intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 24(2), 187–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadzella, B. M. (2003). Reliability of the inventory of learning process. Psychological Reports, 92, 1029–1030.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné F. (1993). Constructs and models pertaining to exceptional human abilities. In: K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 69–87). Oxford - New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galas, B., & Lewowicki, T. (1991). Osobowosc a aspiracje [Personality and Aspirations]. Warszawa: UW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, J. J., & Courtright, R. D. (1986). The educational definition of giftedness and its policy implications. In R. J. Sternberg, & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of Giftedness (pp. 93–111). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, F. (1892). Hereditary Genius. London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1982). Art, mind and brain. A cognitive approach to creativity. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1998). Niepospolite umysly [Extraordinary Minds]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo WAB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, R. D. (1995). Temperament and giftedness; American and European perspectives. In M. W. Katzko, & F. J.Mönks (Eds.), Nurturing talent. individual needs and social ability (pp. 139–147). Assen: Van Gorcum & Comp. B.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, M. L. (1986). Issues in the education of gifted and talented children. Part I. Roeper Review, 8, 226–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, K. M., & Blackman, S. (1978). Cognitive style: Five approaches and relevant research. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes, H., Molholm, S., Ritter, W., Kurtzberg, D., Cowan, N., & Vaughan, H. G. (2000). Mismatch negativity in children and adults, and effects of an attended task. Psychophysiology, 37, 807–816.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1978). Natura inteligencji czlowieka [The Nature of Human Intelligence]. Warszawa: PWN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampson, S. E., Colman, A. M. (2000) (Eds.). Psychologia roznic indywidualnych [Individual Differences and Personality], 7. Poznan: Wydawnictwo Zysk i S-ka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R. (2000). Acts of living. Science, 289, 1303–1304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, J. R. (1985). Three problems in teaching general skills. In S. F. Chapman, J. W. Segal, R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and Learning Skills, vol. 2: Research and Open Questions. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, K. A. (1993). Structural Tendencies and Issues of Research on Giftedness and Talent. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, A. H. Passow (Eds.), International Handbook of Research and Development of Giftedness and Talent, 49–67. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, K.A., Feldhusen, J. F. (1986). Identifying and Nurturing the Gifted. An International Perspective. Toronto. Lewiston N. Y. Bern. Stuttgart: Hans Huber Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, L. M., Ebner, F. F. (1997). The biological basis for early intervention with gifted children. Peabody Journal of Education, 77(3–4), 59–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, W. C. (1995). The dialectics of giftedness: Gifted intellect and creativity. Roeper Review 17(3), 201–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunsacker, S. L. (1994). Creativity as a characteristic of giftedness: Teachers see it, then they don’t. Roeper Review,17(1), 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, N. E., Butterfield, E. C. (1986). A conception of giftedness designed to promote research. In R. J. Sternberg, J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of Giftedness, 151–181. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janas-Stawikowska, B. (2004). In A. E. Sekowski (ed.), Psychologia zdolnosci [The Psychology of Giftedness], 125–142. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaušovec, N. (2000). Differences in cognitive processes between gifted, intelligent, creative, and average individuals while solving complex problems: An EEG study. Intelligence, 28(3), 213–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaušovec, N., Jaušovec, K. (2004). Differences in induced brain activity during the performance of learning and working-memory tasks related to intelligence. Brain and Cognition, 54(1), 65–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jellen, H. G., Verduin, Jr. J. R. (1986). Handbook for Differential Education of the Gifted. A Taxonomy of 32 Key Concepts. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledzinska, M (2005). Inteligencja jednostki a sila doznan stresu informacyjnego – perspektywa edukacyjna [Intelligence of an individual and the intensity of experiencing informational stress—an educational perspective]. XXXII Zjazd Naukowy Polskiego Towarzystwa Psychologicznego, 22–25 September, Krakow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledzinska, M. (1996). Przetwarzanie informacji przez uczniow o zroznicowanym poziomie zdolnosci a ich postepy szkolne [Information processing by students of different levels of ability and their progress at school]. Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza Wydzialu Psychologii UW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leppänen, P. H., Lyytinen, H. (1997). Auditory event-related potentials in the study of developmental language-related disorders. Audiology and Neuro-Otology, 2(5), 308–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewowicki, T. (1986). Ksztalcenie uczniow zdolnych [Teaching Gifted Students]. Warszawa: WSiP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidz, C. S., Elliott, J. G. (2006). Use of dynamic assessment with gifted students. Gifted Education International, 21(2/3), 151–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mönks, F. J. (1992). Development of gifted children: The issue of identification and programming. In F. J. Mönks, A. M. Peters (Eds.), Talent for the Future. Social and Personality Development of Gifted Child. Proceeding of the Ninth World Conference on Gifted and Talented Children, 191–203. Assen-Maastricht: Van Gorcum & Company B.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, D. (2003a). The Person Approach: Concepts, Measurement Models, and Research Strategy. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 101, 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, D. (2003b). Refleksje nad zagadnieniami metodologicznymi w zakresie badan rozwojowych: dwa przeciwstawne podejscia do badan indywidualnych [Reflections on methodological issues in developmental research: Two opposing approaches to individual studies]. In M. Marszal-Wisniewska, T. Klonowicz, M. Fajkowska-Stanik (Eds.), Psychologia roznic indywidualnych [The Psychology of Individual Differences], 142–149. Gdansk: GWP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, D., Törestad, B. (1993). A Holistic view of personality: A model revised. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 427–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marland, S. P. (1972). Education of the Gifted and Talented. Report to the Congress of the United States by the U.S. Commissioner of Education. Washington D. C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. P. (1992). Child temperament effects on special education: Process and outcomes. Exceptionality, 3(2), 99–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinsen, Ø. (1997). The construct of cognitive style and its implications for creativity. High Ability Studies, 7(2), 135–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and Personality. Second edition. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matczak, A., Jaworowska, A., Stanczak, J. (2000). Rysunkowy Test Tworczego Myslenia TCT-DP K. K. Urban, H. G. Jellen. Podrecznik [K. K. Urban and, H. G. Jellen’s Test for Creative Thinking-Drawing Production, TCT-DP. A Handbook]. Warszawa PTP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meece, J. L., Blumenfeld, P. C., Hoyle, R. (1988). Students’ goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 514–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, S. (1994). The matter of style: Manifestations of personality in cognition, learning, and teaching. Educational Psychologist, 29, 121–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mönks, F. J. (1995). Creativity; Idiographic versus nomothetic approach. European Journal for High Ability, 6, 137–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mönks, F. J., Mason, E. J. (1993). Development theories and giftedness. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, A. H. Passow (Eds.), International Handbook of the Giftedness and Talent, 89–102. Oxford. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P. K., Alexander, P. A. (2000). A motivated exploration of motivation terminology. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25, 3–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in Personality. New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, R. S., Pace, T. N. (1986). Counseling Gifted and Talented Students: Historical Perspectives and Contemporary Issues. Journal of Counseling and Development, 86, 548–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Näätänen, R. (2003). Percepcja dzwiekow mowy przez ludzki mozg: dane elektrofizjologiczne [Perception of speech sounds by the human brain: Electrophysiological data]. In M. Marszal-Wisniewska, T. Klonowicz, M. Fajkowska-Stanik (Eds.), Psychologia roznic indywidualnych [The Psychology of Individual Differences], 22–36. Gdansk: GWP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Näätänen, R., Jacobsen, T., Winkler, I. (2005). Memory-based or afferent process in mismatch negativity (MMN): A review of the evidence. Psychophysiology, 42, 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Näätänen, R., Schröger, E., Karakas, S., Tervaniemi, M., Paavilainen, P. (1993). Development of a memory trace for a complex sound in the human brain. NeuroReport, 4(5), 503–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naglieri, J. A. (2001). Understanding intelligence, giftedness and creativity using the PASS theory. Roeper Review, 23(3), 151–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Necka, E. (1992a). Tworcze operacje umyslowe [Creative mental operations]. In M. Materska, T. Tyszka (Eds.), Psychologia i poznanie [Psychology and Cognition], 179–196. Warszawa: PWN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Necka, E. (1992b). Poziomy przetwarzania informacji a pojecie inteligencji [Levels of information processing and the concept of intelligence]. In J. Strelau, W. Ciarkowska, E. Necka (Eds.), Roznice indywidualne: mozliwosci i preferencje [Individual Differences: Possibilities and Preferences], 99–111. Wroclaw Warszawa Krakow: Wydawnictwo PAN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Necka, E. (1994a). Gifted people and novel tasks – The intelligence versus creativity distinction revised. In K. A.. Heller, E. A. Hany (Eds.), Competence and Responsibility, 68–80. Seattle-Toronto: Hogrefe & Huber Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Necka, E. (1994b). Inteligencja i procesy poznawcze [Intelligence and Cognitive Processes]. Krakow: Wydawnictwo IMPULS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Necka, E. (2001). Psychologia tworczosci [The Psychology of Creativity]. Gdansk: GWP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Necka, E. (2003). Inteligencja. Geneza – struktura – funkcje [Intelligence. Genesis—Structure—Functions]. Gdansk: Gdanskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nettle, D. (2001). Strong Imagination. Madness, Creativity, and Human Nature. Oxford New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, L. G. (2003). Roznice indywidualne w funkcjach pamieciowych [Individual differences in memory functions]. In M. Marszal-Wisniewska, T. Klonowicz, M. Fajkowska-Stanik (Eds.), Psychologia roznic indywidualnych [The Psychology of Individual Differences], 49–57. Gdansk: GWP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nosal, Cz. (1990). Psychologiczne modele umyslu [Psychological Models of the Mind]. Warszawa: PWN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nosal, Cz., Piskorz, Z. (1992). Preferencje i sytuacje: rola roznic indywidualnych w regulacji poznawczej [Preferences and situations: The role of individual differences in cognitive regulation]. In J. Strelau, W. Ciarkowska, E. Necka (Eds.), Roznice indywidualne: mozliwosci i preferencje [Individual Differences: Possibilities and Preferences], 113–133. Wroclaw Warszawa Krakow: Wydawnictwo PAN.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Boyle, M. W., Gill, H. S. (1998). On the Relevance of Research Findings in Cognitive Neuroscience to Educational Practice. Educational Psychology Review, 10(4), 397–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piirto, J. (2004). Understanding Creativity. Scottsdale, Arizona: Great Potential Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (2000). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 92–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plomin, R. (1997). Current directions in behavioral genetics: Moving into the mainstream. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 6, 85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plomin, R., Spinath, F. (2002). Genetics and general cognitive ability (g). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(4), 169–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In J. Sternberg, J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Concept of Giftedness, 53–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. S. (2002). A message from the guest editor: Looking at giftedness through a wide angle lens. Exceptionality, 10(2), 65–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. S., Reis, S. M. (2000). The schoolwide enrichment model. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, A. H. Passow (Eds.), International Handbook of the Giftedness and Talent, 367–382. Oxford. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. S., Delcourt, M. A. B. (1986). The legacy and logic of research on the identification of gifted persons. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30, 20–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A., Clinkenbeard, P. R. (1998). Giftedness: An exceptionality examined. Annu. Rev. Psychol, 117–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, N. M. (1997). The role of universities and colleges in educating gifted undergraduates. Peabody Journal of Education, 72, 218–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers J. A. (1998). Refocusing the lens: Using observation to assess and identify gifted learners. In B. Wallace (ed.), Gifted Education International, 12 (3), 129–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (1993). Divergent thinking, creativity and giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37(1), 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, H., Thornton, G. C., Frintrup, A., Mueller-Hanson, R. (2004). Achievement Motivation Inventory. Manual. Oxford: Hogrefe & Huber Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekowski, A. E. (2001). Osiagniecia uczniow zdolnych [Achievements of Gifted Students]. Wyd. II. Lublin: TN KUL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekowski, A. E. (ed.) (2004a). Psychologia zdolnosci [The Psychology of Giftedness]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekowski, A. E. (2004b). Kategoria oceny a funkcjonowanie uczniow zdolnych [The category of grade and the functioning of gifted students]. Psychologia, Edukacja i Spoleczenstwo, 1, 37–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siekanska, M. (2004). Koncepcje zdolnosci a identyfikacja uczniow zdolnych [Conceptions of giftedness and identification of gifted students]. In A. E. Sekowski (ed.), Psychologia zdolnosci [The Psychology of Giftedness], 115–124. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siekanska, M., Sekowski, A. (2006). Job satisfaction and temperament structure of gifted people. High Ability Studies, 17(1), 75–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D.K. (2004). Creativity in Science. Chance, Logic, Genius, and Zeitgeist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, J. C., George, W. C., Solano, C. H. (Eds.). (1977). The Gifted and the Creative: A Fifty-Year Perspective. Revised and Expanded Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Hyman Blumberg Symposium on Research in Early Childhood Education. London: The John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. I. (1986). Gifted, Talented, and Creative Young People. A Guide to Theory, Teaching, and Research. New York & London: Garland Publishing, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stelmack, R. M. (2003). Co o inteligencji moga powiedziec nam potencjaly wywolane? [What event-related potentials can tell us about intelligence?] In M. Marszal-Wisniewska, T. Klonowicz, M. Fajkowska-Stanik (Eds.), Psychologia roznic indywidualnych [The Psychology of Individual Differences], 37–48. Gdansk: GWP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, J. R., Davidson, J. E. (2005). Conceptions of Giftedness. Second Edition. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A Triarchic Theory of Human Intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1996). IQ counts, but what really count is. Successful intelligence. http://www.nassp.org.

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1997a). Educating intelligence: Infusing the triarchic theory into school instruction., In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko (Eds.), Intelligence, Heredity, and Environment, 343–362. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1997b). Successful Intelligence. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1997c). Thinking Styles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Patterns of giftedness: A triarchic analysis. Roeper Review, 22(4), 231–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (2006). Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., Davidson J. E (Eds.) (1986). Conceptions of Giftedness. Cambridge-London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., Davidson, J. E. (1986). Conceptions of giftedness: A map of the terrain. In R. J. Sternberg, J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of Giftedness, 3–20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1977). Intelligence, information processing, and analogical reasoning: The componential analysis of human abilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. (2000). Teaching for Successful Intelligence. To Increase Student Learning and Achievement. Illinois: Arlington Heights.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., Lubart, T. I. (1992). Buy low and sell high: An investment approach to creativity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(1), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., Lubart, T. I. (1993). Creative giftedness: A multivariate investment approach. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37(1), 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strelau, J. (1992). Temperament and giftedness in children and adolescents. In F.J.Mönks, W. Peters (Eds.), Talent for the Future. Social and Personality Development of Gifted Children, 73–86. Assen: Van Gorcum & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strelau, J. (1996). The regulative theory of temperament: Current status. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 131–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strelau, J. (1997). Inteligencja czlowieka [Human Intelligence]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo “Zak”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strelau, J. (1998). Psychologia temperamentu [The Psychology of Temperament]. Warszawa: PWN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strelau, J. (2002). Psychologia roznic indywidualnych [The Psychology of Individual Differences]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe SCHOLAR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, A. J. (1986). Giftedness: A psychosocial approach. In R. J. Sternberg, J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of Giftedness, 21–52. Cambridge-London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tassel-Baska, Van J. (1995). Gifted and talented learners in special populations. In T. Husén and T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Education. Second edition, vol. 5, 2486–2491. Oxford, New York, Yushima: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L. M. (1925). Genetic Studies of Genius. Mental and Physical Characteristics of a Thousand Gifted Children, vol. 1. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L. M., Oden, M. H. (1959). Genetic Studies of Genius: The Gifted Group at Midlife, vol. 4. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L. A., Plomin, R. (1993). Genetic influence on cognitive ability. In K. A. Haller, F. J. Mönks, A. H. Passow (Eds.), International Handbook of Research and Development of Giftedness and Talent, 103–114. Oxford: Pergamon Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L. A., Plomin, R. (2000). Genetic tools for exploring individual differences in intelligence. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International Handbook of Giftedness and Talent 2 nd Edition, 157–164. Oxford: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, B., Haskell, H., Libby, L. (2006). A comparison of learning styles between gifted and non-gifted high school students. Individual Differences Research, 4(2), 106–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trost, G. (1993). Prediction of excellence in school, university and work. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, A. H. Passow (Eds.), International Handbook of Research and Development of Giftedness and Talent, 325–337. Oxford: Pergamon Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyszkowa, M. (1990). Zdolnosci, osobowosc i dzialalnosc uczniow [Abilities, Personality, and Learners’ Activity ] Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, K. K. (1994). Recent trends in creativity research and theory. In K. A. Heller, E. A. Hany (Eds.), Competence and Responsibilit, 55–67. Seatle-Toronto: Hogrefe & Huber Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, K. K., Sekowski A. E. (1993). Programs and practices for identifying and nurturing giftedness and talent in Europe. In K. Heller, F. J. Mönks, H. A. Passow (Eds.), International Handbook of Research and Development of Giftedness and Talent, 779–796. Oxford - New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Boxtel H. W., Mönks F. J. (1992). General, social and academic self-concept of gifted adolescents. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 21 (2), 169–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, P. A. (1990). An overview of chronometric measures of intelligence. School Psychology Review, 19, 399–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, V. S. (1986). Foreword. In H. G. Jellen, J. R. Verduin, Jr. (Eds.), Handbook for Differential Education of the Gifted, IX-X. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, R. W. (2006). Creativity. Understanding Innovation in Problem Solving, Science, Invention, and Arts. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wentzel, K. R. (1989). Adolescent classroom goals, standards for performance and academic achievement: An interactionist perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 131–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., Eccles, S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, S. C. (1993). WISC-R profiles of children with superior intellectual ability. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37(2), 84–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, I., Kujala, T., Tiitinen, H., Sivonen, P., Alku, P., Lehtokoski, A., Czigler, I., Csépe, V., Ilmoniemi, R.J., Näätänen, R. (1999). Brain responses reveal the learning of foreign language phonemes. Psychophysiology, 36, 638–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner, E. (1996). Gifted Children: Myths and Realities. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkin, H. (1977). Cognitive styles in the educational setting. New York University Educational Quarterly, 8, 14–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witty, P. (ed.). (1950). The Gifted Child. Lexington, Mass: D. C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yewchuk, C., Lupart, J. L. (1993). Gifted handicapped: A desultory duality. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, A. H. Passow (Eds.), International Handbook of Research and Development of Giftedness and Talent, 709–726. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, A., Raul, T. (2000). Myth and reality: A review of empirical studies on giftedness. High Ability Studies, 11(2), 113–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuk, T. (1986). Uzdolnienia tworcze a osobowosc [Creative Abilities and Personality]. Poznan: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrzej Sekowski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sekowski, A., Siekanska, M., Klinkosz, W. (2009). On Individual Differences in Giftedness. In: Shavinina, L.V. (eds) International Handbook on Giftedness. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6162-2_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics