Abstract
Evidence for interpretable neural correlates of giftedness comes from two main lines of enquiry. First, studies comparing the neural functioning of gifted children with age-matched peers not identified as gifted consistently report that gifted subjects display enhanced frontal cortical activation and inter-hemispheric functional connectivity. Second, studies which compare the neural function and structure of high-IQ adults with those of average IQ consistently report that high-IQ subjects display relatively enhanced inferior lateral prefrontal cortical (PFC) activations, together with relatively enhanced activations in a network of other cortical regions including the inferior parietal cortex. The salience of PFC activations is supported by neuroanatomical studies in which the grey matter densities of high-IQ subjects in frontal regions are significantly higher than average. These data can account for enhanced executive capability as one important neuropsychological characteristic of gifted people and a more efficacious working memory as another.
Keywords
Gifted children process information more rapidly and with less attenuation than others. Such individual differences can be attributed to neurophysiological differences that affect neuronal efficiency.
Geake (1997, p. 28)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alexander, J. E., O’Boyle, M. W., & Benbow, C. P. (1996). Developmentally advanced EEG alpha power in gifted male and female adolescents. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 23, 25–31.
Baddeley, A., & Sala, S. D. (1998). Working memory and executive control. In A. C. Roberts, T. W. Robbins, & L. Weiskrantz (Eds.), The prefrontal cortex: Executive and cognitive functions (pp. 9–21). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Birbaumer, N., Lutzenberger, W., Rau, H., Braun, C., & Mayer-Kress, G. (1996). Perception of music and dimensional complexity of brain activity. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 6(2), 267–278.
Carlsson, I., Wendt, P. E., & Risberg, J. (2000). On the neurobiology of creativity. Differences in frontal activity between high and low creative subjects. Neuropsychologia, 38, 873–885.
Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2003). Decreased latent inhibition is associated with high-functioning individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 499–506.
Chen, A. C. N. & Buckley, K. C. (1988). Neural perspectives of cerebral correlates of giftedness. International Journal of Neuroscience, 9(41), 115–125.
Clark, B. (1997). Growing up gifted (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Cowan, N. (2005). Working memory capacity. Psychology Press: New York.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1998). Creativity and genius: A systems perspective. In A. Steptoe (Ed.), Genius and the mind: Studies of creativity and temperament (pp. 39–64). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dehaene, S., Kerszberg, M., & Changeux, J.-P. (1998). A neuronal model of a global workspace in effortful cognitive tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 95, 14529–14534.
Duncan, J. (2001). An adaptive coding model of neural function in prefrontal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(11), 820–829.
Duncan, J., & Owen, A. M. (2000). Common regions of the human frontal lobe recruited by diverse cognitive demands. Trends in Neurosciences, 23, 475–483.
Duncan, J., Seitz, R. J., Kolodny, J., Bor, D., Herzog, H., & Ahmed, A., et al. (2000). A neural basis for intelligence. Science, 289, 457–460.
Fardell, R., & Geake, J. G. (2003). Vertical semester organisation in a rural secondary school as a vehicle for acceleration of gifted students, Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 11(2), 16–30.
Frangou, S., Chitins, X., & Williams, S. C. (2004). Mapping IQ and gray matter density in healthy young people. NeuroImage, 23(3), 800–805.
Fuster, J. M. (2003). Cortex and mind: Unifying cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Pres.
Gagné, F. (1985). Giftedness and talent: Reexamining a reexamination of the definitions. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29(3), 103–112.
Geake, J. G. (1996). Why Mozart? An information processing account of musical abilities. Research Studies in Music Education Journal, 7, 28–45.
Geake, J. G. (1997). Thinking as evolution in the brain: Implications for giftedness. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 6(1), 27–33.
Geake, J. G. (2005a). The neurological basis of intelligence: Implications for education – An abstract. Gifted and Talented, 9(1), 8.
Geake, J. G. (2005b). An fMRI study of fluid analogical reasoning: Towards an understanding mathematical thinking.Symposium on mathematical and scientific education. Copenhagen: Learning Lab Denmark, December.
Geake, J. G. (2006). Mathematical brains. Gifted and Talented, 10(1), 2–7.
Geake, J. G., & Cooper, P. W. (2003). Implications of cognitive neuroscience for education. Westminster Studies in Education, 26(10), 7–20.
Geake, J. G., & Dodson, C. S. (2005). A neuro-psychological model of the creative intelligence of gifted children. Gifted & Talented International, 20(1), 4–16.
Geake, J. G., & Hansen, P. (2005). Neural correlates of intelligence as revealed by fMRI of fluid analogies, NeuroImage, 26(2), 555–564.
Geake, J. G., & Hansen, P. C. (2006). Functional neural correlates of high creative intelligence as determined by abilities at fluid analogising, Society for Neuroscience Annual Meeting, Atlanta, Georgia, October 17.
Geake, J. G., & Hansen, P. C. (submitted). Neural correlates of high creative intelligence as determined by abilities at fluid analogising.
Geake, J. G., & Kringelbach, M. L. (2007). Imaging imagination: Brain scanning of the imagined future. In I. Roth (Ed.), Imaginative minds. London: Proceedings of the British Academy, 147, 307–326.
Geake, J. G., & O’Boyle, M. (2000). On Educating the very able in mathematics: A sampling of current empirical research. Proceedings of Mathematics 2000 Festival, 10–13 January, University of Melbourne, pp. 153–156.
Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155–170.
Giedd, J. N., Blumethal, J., Jeffires, N. O., Castellanos, F. X., Liu, H., & Zijdenbois, A., et al. (1999). Brain development during childhood and adolescence: A longitudinal MRI study. Nature Neuroscience, 2(10), 861–863.
Gleick, J. (1992). Genius: Richard Feynman and modern physics. Abacus.
Gray, J. R., Chabris, C. F., & Braver, T. S. (2003). Neural mechanisms of general fluid intelligence. Nature Neuroscience, 6(3), 316–322.
Gross, M. U. M. (2004). Exceptionally gifted children (2nd ed.). London: Routledge Farmer.
Haier, R. J., & Benbow, C. P. (1995). Sex differences and lateralisation in temporal lobe glucose metabolism during mathematical reasoning. Developmental Neuropsychology, 11(4), 405–414.
Haier, R. J., Jung, R. E., Yeo, R. A., Head, K., & Alkire, M. T. (2004). Structural brain variation and general intelligence. NeuroImage, 23(1), 425–433.
Haier, R. J., White, N. S., & Alkire, M. T. (2003). Individual differences in general intelligence correlate with brain function during nonreasoning tasks. Intelligence, 31(5), 429–441.
Hofstadter, D. (1995). Fluid concepts and creative analogies. Basic Books, New York.
Hofstadter, D. (2001). Analogy as the core of cognition. In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. N. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 499–538). Cambridge MA: MIT Press,.
Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1995). Mental leaps: Analogy in creative thought. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Howard, D. (1997). Language in the human brain. In M. D. Rugg (Ed.), Cognitive neuroscience (pp. 277–304). Hove UK: Psychology Press.
James, W. (1895/1950). The principles of psychology. New York: Henry Holt.
Johnson, J., Im-Bolter, N., & Pascual-Leone, J. (2003). Development of mental attention in gifted and mainstream children: The role of mental capacity, inhibition, and speed of processing. Child Development, 74(6), 1594–1614.
Jung, R. E., & Haier, R. J. (2007). The Parieto-Frontal integration theory (P-FIT) of intelligence: Converging neuroimaging evidence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30, 135–154.
Kalbfleisch, M. L. (2004). Functional neural anatomy of talent. The Anatomical Record Part B: The New Anatomist, 277B(1), 21–36.
Kanevsky, L. S. (1995). Learning potentials of gifted students. Roeper Review, 17, 157–163.
Kolb, B., & Wishaw, I. Q. (1996). Fundamentals of human neuropsychology (4th ed.). New York: W.H. Freeman & Co.
LeDoux, J. (1998). The Emotional Brain. New York: Phoenix.
Lee, K. H., Choi, Y. Y., Gray, J. R., Cho, S. H., Chae, J.-H., & Lee, S., et al. (2006). Neural correlates of superior intelligence: Stronger recruitment of posterior parietal cortex. Neuroimage, 29(2), 578–586.
Lehrl, S., & Fisher, B. (1990). A basic information psychological parameter (BIP) for the reconstruction of concepts of intelligence. European Journal of Personality, 4, 259–286.
Livne, N. L., Livne, O. E., & Milgram, R. M. (1999). Assessing academic and creative abilities in mathematics at four levels of understanding. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 30(2), 227–242.
Luria, A. R. (1973). The working brain. New York: Basic Books.
Mitchell, M. (1993). Analogy-making as perception: A computer model. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Mills, D. L., Plunkett, K., Prat, C., & Schafer, G. (2005). Watching the infant brain learn words: Effects of vocabulary size and experience. Cognitive Development, 20, 19–31.
Mithen, S. (1996). The prehistory of the mind: The cognitive origins of art and science. London: Thames and Hudson.
Mithen, S. (2005). The singing neanderthals. London: Phoenix.
O’Boyle, M. W. (2000). Neuroscientific research findings and their potential application to gifted educational practice. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 9(1), 6–10.
O’Boyle, M. W., Alexander, J. E., & Benbow, C. P. (1991).Enhanced right hemisphere activation in the mathematically precocious: A preliminary EEG investigation. Brain Cognition, 17(2), 138–153.
O’Boyle, M. W., & Benbow, C. P. (1990). Enhanced right hemisphere involvement during cognitive processing may relate to intellectual precocity. Neuropsychologia, 28(2), 211–216.
O’Boyle, M. W., Benbow, C. P., & Alexander, J. E. (1995). Sex differences, hemispheric laterality, and associated brain activity in the intellectually gifted. Developmental Neuropsychology, 11(4), 415–443.
O’Boyle, M. W., Cunnington, R., Silk, T., Vaughan, D., Jackson, G., & Syngeniotis, A., et al. (2005). Mathematically gifted male adolescents activate a unique brain network during mental rotation. Cognitive Brain Research, 25, 583–587.
O’Boyle, M. W., Gill, H. S., Benbow, C. P., & Alexander, J. E.. (1994). Concurrent finger-tapping in mathematically gifted males: Evidence for enhanced right hemisphere involvement during linguistic processing. Cortex, 30(3), 519–526.
Orzhekhovskaia, N. S. (1996). The cytoarchitectonic characteristics of the frontal fields of the brain in gifted people. Morfologiia, 109(3), 7–9.
Porter, L. (1997). A proposed model describing the realisation of gifted potential. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 6(2), 33–43.
Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53–92). Cambridge MA: Cambridge University Press.
Rolls, E. T. (1999). The brain and emotion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ryan, M., & Geake, J. G. (2003). A study of a vertical curriculum in mathematics for gifted primary pupils, Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 11(2), 31–41.
Rypma, B., Prabhakaran, V., Desmond, J. E., Glover, G. H., & Gabrieli, J. D. (1999). Load-dependent roles of frontal brain regions in the maintenance of working memory. NeuroImage, 9, 216–226.
Samco, M. R., Caplovitz, G. P., Hsieh, P.-J., & Tse, P. U. (2005). Neural correlates of human creativity revealed using diffusion tensor imaging [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 5(8), 906.
Shapiro, M. L., & Eichenbaum, H. (1997). Learning and memory: Computational principles and neural mechanisms. In M. D. Rugg (Ed.), Cognitive neuroscience (pp. 77–130). Hove UK: Psychology Press.
Shavinin. (2006). Personal communication. October 2006.
Shaw, P., Greenstein, D., Lerch, J., Clasen, L., Lenroot, R., & Gogtay, N., et al. (2006). Intellectual ability and cortical development in children and adolescents. Nature, 440(7084), 676–679.
Singh, H., & O’Boyle, M. W. (2004). Interhemispheric interaction during global-local processing in mathematically gifted adolescents, average-ability youth, and college students. Neuropsychology, 18(2), 671–677.
Steptoe, A. (Ed.) (1998). Genius and the mind: Studies of creativity and temperament. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vigneau, F., Caissie, A. F., & Bors, D. A. (2006). Eye-movement analysis demonstrates strategic influences on intelligence. Intelligence, 34, 261–272.
Zhang, Q., Shi, J., Luo, Y., Zhao, D., & Yang, J. (2006). Intelligence and information processing during a visual search task in children: An event-related potential study. Neuroreport, 17(7), 747–752.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Geake, J.G. (2009). Neuropsychological Characteristics of Academic and Creative Giftedness. In: Shavinina, L.V. (eds) International Handbook on Giftedness. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6162-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6162-2_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6161-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6162-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)