Vegetation and soil properties in restored wetlands near Lake Taihu, China

  • Jinwei Lu
  • Hongjun Wang
  • Weidong Wang
  • Chengqing YinEmail author
Part of the Developments in Hydrobiology book series (DIHY, volume 194)


Riparian wetlands are important components of the lake ecosystem, and they play essential roles in maintaining system health. Remediation of degraded lakeshore wetlands is an essential component of lake restoration. A study was conducted to investigate the restoration of lakeshore wetlands, which were converted to rice fields and then abandoned for 2, 5, 10 and 15 years, near Lake Taihu. Soil samples (0–20 cm and 20–40 cm) were taken and plant species were investigated. The carbon content in the soil had increased significantly, rising from 0.71% to 1.85% between 2 and 15 years. Organic matter accumulation improved soil texture, and water stable aggregate content (>0.25 mm) and soil porosity increased. Total nitrogen in the soil increased from 0.06% to 0.13%, and total Kjeldahl nitrogen increased from 124.4 mg kg−1 to 351.5 mg kg−1. Total phosphorus in the soil increased from 0.045% to 0.071%, and the Olsen-P value increased from 5.13 mg kg−1 to 16.0 mg kg−1. Results showed that phosphorous did not increase as much as nitrogen. In the vegetation restoration process, plant species composition moved towards a natural wetland community, and spatial heterogeneity and landscape diversity increased. The richness of plant biodiversity increased rapidly in the first 2 years, then more slowly in later restoration stages. The wetlands recovery process may be complicated by interactions of biota and soil and hydrological conditions.


Lakeshore Wetlands Restoration Dynamics Process Vegetation Soil nutrients Lake Taihu 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andrew, E. C. & H. Baldwin, 2002. Responses of wetland plants to ammonia and water level. Ecological Engineering 18: 257–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aronson, J., C. Floret, E. Le Floc’h, C. Ovalle & R. Pontanier, 1993. Restoration and rehabilitation of degraded ecosystems in arid and semiarid lands. I. A view from the south. Restoration Ecology 1: 8–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Browman, R. A., J. D. Reeder & R. W. Lober, 1990. Changes in soil properties in Central Plain rangeland soil after 3, 20, and 60 years of cultivation. Soil Science 150: 851–857.Google Scholar
  4. Bruland, G. L. & C. J. Richardson, 2004. A spatially explicit investigation of phosphorus sorption and related soil properties in two riparian wetlands. Journal of Environmental Quality 33: 785–794.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruland, G. L. & C. J. Richardson, 2005. Spatial variability of soil properties in created, restored, and paired natural wetlands. Soil Science Society of America Journal 69: 273–284.Google Scholar
  6. Castelli, R. M., J. C. Chambers & R. J. Tausch, 2000. Soil-water relations along a soil-water gradient in Great Basin riparian meadows. Wetlands 20: 251–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen, H. S., 2001. Restoration project of the ecosystem in Lake Taihu. Resources and Environment in the Changjiang River Basin 10(2): 173–178 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  8. Chen, J. Y. & S. L. Chen, 2002. Challenges to estuary and shoreline in China. Marine Geology 18(1): 1–5 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  9. Comin, F. A., J. A. Romero, H. Oliver & M. Menéndez, 2001. Restoration of wetlands from abandoned paddy fields for nutrient removal, and biological community and landscape diversity. Restoration Ecology 9(2): 201–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coveney, M. F., D. L. Stites & E. F. Lowe, 2002. Nutrient removal from eutrophic lake water by wetland filtration. Ecological Engineering 19: 141–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooper, J. R., J. W. Gilliam & R. B. Daniels, 1987. Riparian areas as filters for agricultural sediment. Soil Science Society of American Journal 51(2): 416–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Craft, C., 2000. Co-development of wetland soil and benthic invertabrate communities following salt marsh creation. Wetland Ecology and Management 8(2): 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grantz, D. A., D. L. Vaughn, R. J. Farber, B. Kim, L. Ashbaugh, T. VanCuren, R. Campbell, D. Bainbridge & T. Zink, 1998. Transplanting native plants to revegetate abandoned farmlands in the western Mojave Desert. Journal of Environmental Quality 27: 960–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hu, Y. & L. G. Jiang, 2004. Returning farmland to lakerestoration of the kidney of Yangtse River. Chinese National Geography 11: 138–146.Google Scholar
  15. Jin, X. S., H. Liu & Q. Y. Tu, 1990. Lake eutrophication in China. Environmental Sciences Press of China (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  16. Kosmas, C., S. T. Gerontidis & M. Marathianou, 2000. The effect of land use change on soil and vegetation over various lithological formations on Lesvos (Greece). Catena 40: 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lee, C. S., Y. H. You & G. R. Robinson, 2002. Secondary succession and natural habit restoration in abandoned fields of central Korea. Restoration Ecology 10: 306–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li, Y. Q., 2003. Vegetation dynamics and soil characteristics during grassland succession process in abandoned land. MS degree dissertation thesis, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 36 pp.Google Scholar
  19. Naiman, R. J. & H. Décamps, 1997. The ecology of interfaces: riparian zones. Annual Review Ecological Systematics 28: 621–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Naiman, R. J., H. Décamps & F. Fournier (eds), 1994. The role of land/inland water ecotones in landscape management and restoration: a proposal for collaborative research. MAB digest 4, UNESCO.Google Scholar
  21. National Bureau of Statistics of China, 2001. Development Report of China in 2001: the ninth five-year plan. Chinese Statistics Press, Beijing, 352 pp (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  22. Peng, S. L., 1995. The restoration and rehabilitation of the degraded ecosystems in the southern part of subtropical China. In Chen, L. Z. & W. L. Chen (eds), Studies on Degraded Ecosystems in China. China’s Science and Technology Publishing House, Beijing, 94–113.Google Scholar
  23. Singh, K. P., T. N. Mandal & S. K. Tripathi, 2001. Patterns of restoration of soil physicochemical properties and microbial biomass in different landslide sites in the hilly forest ecosystem of Nepal Himalaya. Ecological Engineering 17: 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Soil Science Society of America and American Society of Agronomy, 1996. Methods of Soil Analysis: Chemical Methods. SSSA Incorporation and ASA Incorporation, Madison, NJ, USA.Google Scholar
  25. Song, Y. C., 2001. The Species Composition of Vegetation Communities. Vegetation Ecology. East China Normal University Press, 62–89.Google Scholar
  26. Tabacchi, E., D. L. Correll, R. Hauer, G. Pinay, A.-M. Planty-Tabacchi & R. C. Wissmar, 1998. Development, maintenance and role of riparian vegetation in the river landscape. Freshwater Biology 40: 497–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Vollenweider, R. A., 1992. Coastal marine eutrophication: principles and control. In Vollenweider, R. A., R. Marchetti & R. Viviani (eds), Marine Coastal Eutrophication, Elsevier Science Publications, 1–20.Google Scholar
  28. Xiong, Z. P., 2004. The analysis for the causes of floods in China and the counter measures for reducing the damage. China Water Resources, 16 pp.Google Scholar
  29. Yin, C. Q. & Z. W. Lan, 1995. The nutrient retention by ecotone wetlands and their modification for Baiyangdian Lake restoration. Water Science and Technology 32(3): 159–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jinwei Lu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Hongjun Wang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Weidong Wang
    • 1
  • Chengqing Yin
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.SKLEAC, the Research Center for Eco-Environmental SciencesChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.Graduate School of the Chinese Academy SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.Northeast Institute of Geography and Agricultural Ecology, CASJinlin Province, ChangchunChina

Personalised recommendations