Preventing Genetic Pollution and the Establishment of Feral Populations: A Molecular Solution
Aquaculture animals that escape from farms have the potential to create major environmental problems. These include establishment of potentially destructive feral populations (e.g., Pacific oysters [Crassostrea gigas] in Australia, Atlantic salmon [Salmo salar] in British Columbia) and genetic contamination of wild stocks. The latter includes introgression of foreign genes into natural populations from both hatchery-reared fish and genetically modified fish and invertebrates. Concern about these environmental and genetic effects has already led to restrictions on aquaculture industry development and is likely to grow as demand for genetically improved stocks escalates to fulfill production objectives. To circumvent these problems, we have developed a genetic construct that, when properly integrated into production-line fish or invertebrates, should render individuals functionally sterile outside of hatchery conditions. In the hatchery, however, provision of a simple repressor compound at a particular life-history stage allows the animals to be bred and reared as normal. We are developing this “Sterile Feral” technology for both invertebrate and fish species, and we anticipate practical commercial application within a few years.
KeywordsAtlantic Salmon Pacific Oyster Blocker Sequence Blocker Gene Feral Population
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Davis, P.R. 1996. Parliamentary Investigation into the Farming of Pacific Oysters in Victorian Coastal Waters. Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Victoria, Australia. 84 pp.Google Scholar
- Guo, X., and S.K. Allen, Jr. 1994a. Viable tetraploids in the Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas Thunberg) produced by inhibiting polar body 1 in eggs from triploids. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology 3: 42–50.Google Scholar
- Hindar, K. 1999. Introductions at the level of genes and populations. In: O.T. Sandlund, P.J. Schei, and A. Viken (eds.), Invasive Species and Biodiversity Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Pp. 149–161.Google Scholar
- Holliday, J.E., and J.A. Nell. 1987. The Pacific oyster in New South Wales. AGFACT F2.1.3, Department of Agriculture, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 4 pp.Google Scholar
- Medcof, J.C., and P.H. Wolf. 1975. Spread of Pacific oyster worries NSW culturists. Australian Fisheries 34: 32–38.Google Scholar
- Meinez, A. 1999. Killer Algae. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA. 360 pp.Google Scholar
- Meinez, A., J.-M. Cottalorda, D. Chiaverini, N. Cassar, and J. de Vaugelas. 1998. Suivi de L'invasion de L'algue Tropicale Caulerpa taxifolia en Méditerranée: Situation au 31 Décembre 1997. Laboratoire Environnement Marin Littoral, University of Nice-Sophia, Antipolis, France. 238 pp.Google Scholar
- Oliver, M.J., J.E. Quisenberry, N.L.G. Trolinder, D.L. Keim. 1998. Control of plant gene expression. United States Patents 5: 723–765.Google Scholar
- Saegrov, H., K. Hindar, S. Kalas, and H. Lura. 1997. Escaped farmed Atlantic salmon replace the original salmon stocks in the River Vosso, western Norway. ICES Journal of Marine Science 54: 1166–1172.Google Scholar
- Sumner, C.E. 1974. Oysters and Tasmania, Part 2. Tasmanian Fisheries Research 3: 1–12.Google Scholar
- van Gelder, T. 1998. Oysters un-natural. The Weekend Australian, August 1–2, 1998.Google Scholar